Here’s another interesting item about climate change, sent our way by Mike Zaharee. It appears that some of the data about which of the past hundred years or so have been the warmest may have been a bit off. See this post as well.
Related content from Sphere- View a Random Post
-
Contents
-
Categories
- Alison
- Apophthegmata
- Books
- Cape Cod
- Chess
- Darwin and Biology
- Dualism vs. Materialism
- Foreign Affairs
- Free Will
- General
- Global Warming
- Haiku
- Inner Work
- Jihad
- Language
- Marginalia
- Martial Arts
- Mind and Brain
- Music and Recording
- Politics
- Pretty Good Posts
- Reason and Philosophy
- Religion
- Rubbish
- Science
- Shameless Filler
- Society and Culture
- Sport
- Technology
- Tomfoolery
- Uncategorized
-
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
3 Comments
Take a look here for some more perspective:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/08/1934-and-all-that/
Thanks, Andrew. How difficult it is to sort out fact from fiction on this topic, where there is so much hysteria, and so much reactionary prejudice.
Even worse, read this:
http://www.informath.org/WCWF07a.pdf
Also, as an American you should be aware that the US authorities claim that all weather station data is adjusted to allow for local conditions – but they refuse to disclose the statistical codes used to make these adjustments!
Personally I do not at this moment accept the claims of the HAFs (Hot Air Fanatics) but I am wholly in favour of honest science being applied to what *might* be a serious problem.