<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, No, No, You&#8217;re Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/</link>
	<description>I go many places</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the one eyed man</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-59117</link>
		<dc:creator>the one eyed man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/#comment-59117</guid>
		<description>One could also make the case that &quot;I Feel Fine&quot; was even more revolutionary, as it is the first rock song to use feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could also make the case that &#8220;I Feel Fine&#8221; was even more revolutionary, as it is the first rock song to use feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeZ</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-58916</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/#comment-58916</guid>
		<description>I had not actually planned to listen to all of Rubber Soul, Revolver and Sgt Pepper&#039;s after my comment last night.   But, they went well with the recommended reading material.  :-)   I still think I favor Rubber Soul.  I can see your point, however.

- M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had not actually planned to listen to all of Rubber Soul, Revolver and Sgt Pepper&#8217;s after my comment last night.   But, they went well with the recommended reading material.  :-)   I still think I favor Rubber Soul.  I can see your point, however.</p>
<p>- M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-58881</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/#comment-58881</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

&lt;em&gt;Rubber Soul&lt;/em&gt; is a splendid album, and the song &lt;em&gt;In My Life&lt;/em&gt; is a perennial contender in &quot;best song of all time&quot; polls, but while &lt;em&gt;RS&lt;/em&gt; was an important step in the Beatles&#039; musical journey, it was still embedded an earlier musical and technological tradition. It was not until Revolver that the full, disruptive extent of the band&#039;s creativity (and that of the visionaries George Martin and Geoff Emerick, whose input was, I think, as important as the band&#039;s) became apparent. There were innovations, to be sure, on &lt;em&gt;Rubber Soul&lt;/em&gt;, but the world had simply never heard anything, for example, like &lt;em&gt;Tomorrow Never Knows&lt;/em&gt;, which was an abrupt break with everything that had ever happened in a recording studio before.

I do love &lt;em&gt;Rubber Soul&lt;/em&gt;, though. What a great record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p><em>Rubber Soul</em> is a splendid album, and the song <em>In My Life</em> is a perennial contender in &#8220;best song of all time&#8221; polls, but while <em>RS</em> was an important step in the Beatles&#8217; musical journey, it was still embedded an earlier musical and technological tradition. It was not until Revolver that the full, disruptive extent of the band&#8217;s creativity (and that of the visionaries George Martin and Geoff Emerick, whose input was, I think, as important as the band&#8217;s) became apparent. There were innovations, to be sure, on <em>Rubber Soul</em>, but the world had simply never heard anything, for example, like <em>Tomorrow Never Knows</em>, which was an abrupt break with everything that had ever happened in a recording studio before.</p>
<p>I do love <em>Rubber Soul</em>, though. What a great record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeZ</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-58843</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2007/08/19/no-no-no-youre-wrong/#comment-58843</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great find, but  Rubber Soul is better than Revolver.

My 2 cents.

- M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great find, but  Rubber Soul is better than Revolver.</p>
<p>My 2 cents.</p>
<p>- M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

