<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sticky Situation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/</link>
	<description>I go many places</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-71995</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/#comment-71995</guid>
		<description>Stupid you ain&#039;t, amigo. And lunch will be on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid you ain&#8217;t, amigo. And lunch will be on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-71988</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/#comment-71988</guid>
		<description>Indeed. Next time I am in town I will definitely drop you a line and take you up on that offer (maybe followed by lunch?).

I seem to be still logged in, so it appears to have been the checkbox. Boy do I feel stupid now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. Next time I am in town I will definitely drop you a line and take you up on that offer (maybe followed by lunch?).</p>
<p>I seem to be still logged in, so it appears to have been the checkbox. Boy do I feel stupid now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-71913</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/#comment-71913</guid>
		<description>Next time you&#039;re in Gotham, Charles, I&#039;ll be glad to demonstrate.

Glad to hear about the checkbox; I think that was probably your problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next time you&#8217;re in Gotham, Charles, I&#8217;ll be glad to demonstrate.</p>
<p>Glad to hear about the checkbox; I think that was probably your problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-71874</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/#comment-71874</guid>
		<description>I do get the idea, but not having ever trained in this style there is a limit to my comprehension. I would like to see it in action (by that I mean experience it for myself), but unfortunately that&#039;s probably not going to happen any time soon.

(On the login front, I&#039;ve logged in again, and I noticed that the &quot;remember me&quot; checkbox was not checked in the login form. Perhaps this has something to do with it? I checked it, so hopefully I&#039;ll stay logged in. If not, though, at least I can log in again easily.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do get the idea, but not having ever trained in this style there is a limit to my comprehension. I would like to see it in action (by that I mean experience it for myself), but unfortunately that&#8217;s probably not going to happen any time soon.</p>
<p>(On the login front, I&#8217;ve logged in again, and I noticed that the &#8220;remember me&#8221; checkbox was not checked in the login form. Perhaps this has something to do with it? I checked it, so hopefully I&#8217;ll stay logged in. If not, though, at least I can log in again easily.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-71786</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/#comment-71786</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles,

That&#039;s a good question. I&#039;ll point out for starters that for either opponent to strike the other, the two fighters have to be within arm&#039;s reach of one another, however briefly.

It&#039;s true that some (generally more &quot;northern&quot;) styles feature &quot;longer-range&quot; techniques - primarily kicking, as in tae kwon do, but also various hand techniques as well. The southern fighter&#039;s wish is to force matters to operate at close range. If, as they say, the &quot;mountain won&#039;t come to Mohammed&quot;, then it&#039;s necessary for the southern stylist to take charge. The simplest approach is to close rapidly with some technique that must be blocked, for example a strike to the head or upper torso. Once the opponent raises his &quot;bridge&quot; to block, the connection is made. An important skill for the southern fighter is to be able then to close the range quickly behind his bridging hand. For example: one throws a strike to the opponent&#039;s head at fairly long range, which is blocked by a raised forearm. One then brings one&#039;s stance and lower body forward, closing the arms inward to maintain the sticking contact as the range narrows  --  after which one uses one&#039;s &quot;short power&quot; to control and attack the opponent inside his preferred range. One needs to be both mobile and rooted in one&#039;s stance.

It would be much easier to show you this than convey it with words, but I hope you get the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good question. I&#8217;ll point out for starters that for either opponent to strike the other, the two fighters have to be within arm&#8217;s reach of one another, however briefly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that some (generally more &#8220;northern&#8221;) styles feature &#8220;longer-range&#8221; techniques &#8211; primarily kicking, as in tae kwon do, but also various hand techniques as well. The southern fighter&#8217;s wish is to force matters to operate at close range. If, as they say, the &#8220;mountain won&#8217;t come to Mohammed&#8221;, then it&#8217;s necessary for the southern stylist to take charge. The simplest approach is to close rapidly with some technique that must be blocked, for example a strike to the head or upper torso. Once the opponent raises his &#8220;bridge&#8221; to block, the connection is made. An important skill for the southern fighter is to be able then to close the range quickly behind his bridging hand. For example: one throws a strike to the opponent&#8217;s head at fairly long range, which is blocked by a raised forearm. One then brings one&#8217;s stance and lower body forward, closing the arms inward to maintain the sticking contact as the range narrows  &#8212;  after which one uses one&#8217;s &#8220;short power&#8221; to control and attack the opponent inside his preferred range. One needs to be both mobile and rooted in one&#8217;s stance.</p>
<p>It would be much easier to show you this than convey it with words, but I hope you get the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/comment-page-1/#comment-71751</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2008/01/13/sticky-situation/#comment-71751</guid>
		<description>It has been so many years since I&#039;ve trained that I wouldn&#039;t even really call myself an enthusiast, let alone a practitioner. So if the following question is a bit foolish, forgive me: how does chi sao work against an opponent who doesn&#039;t maintain close quarters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been so many years since I&#8217;ve trained that I wouldn&#8217;t even really call myself an enthusiast, let alone a practitioner. So if the following question is a bit foolish, forgive me: how does chi sao work against an opponent who doesn&#8217;t maintain close quarters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

