It’s Been Fun

Reader JK, who has his ear to the ground at all times, alerts us to some worrisome news. Apparently the prevalence in the environment of certain chemical pollutants has reached such high levels that a broad assortment of vertebrate species are producing increasingly “feminized” males.

This from an item in the British paper The Independent:

Wildlife and people have been exposed to more than 100,000 new chemicals in recent years, and the European Commission has admitted that 99 per cent of them are not adequately regulated. There is not even proper safety information on 85 per cent of them.

Many have been identified as “endocrine disrupters” – or gender-benders – because they interfere with hormones. These include phthalates, used in food wrapping, cosmetics and baby powders among other applications; flame retardants in furniture and electrical goods; PCBs, a now banned group of substances still widespread in food and the environment; and many pesticides.

The report – published by the charity CHEMTrust and drawing on more than 250 scientific studies from around the world – concentrates mainly on wildlife, identifying effects in species ranging from the polar bears of the Arctic to the eland of the South African plains, and from whales in the depths of the oceans to high-flying falcons and eagles.

It concludes: “Males of species from each of the main classes of vertebrate animals (including bony fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals) have been affected by chemicals in the environment.

What sort of effects are we talking about?

Half the male fish in British lowland rivers have been found to be developing eggs in their testes; in some stretches all male roaches have been found to be changing sex in this way. Female hormones – largely from the contraceptive pills which pass unaltered through sewage treatment – are partly responsible, while more than three-quarters of sewage works have been found also to be discharging demasculinising man-made chemicals. Feminising effects have now been discovered in a host of freshwater fish species as far away as Japan and Benin, in Africa, and in sea fish in the North Sea, the Mediterranean, Osaka Bay in Japan and Puget Sound on the US west coast.

Research at the University of Florida earlier this year found that 40 per cent of the male cane toads – a species so indestructible that it has become a plague in Australia – had become hermaphrodites in a heavily farmed part of the state, with another 20 per cent undergoing lesser feminisation. A similar link between farming and sex changes in northern leopard frogs has been revealed by Canadian research, adding to suspicions that pesticides may be to blame.

Male alligators exposed to pesticides in Florida have suffered from lower testosterone and higher oestrogen levels, abnormal testes, smaller penises and reproductive failures. Male snapping turtles have been found with female characteristics in the same state and around the Great Lakes, where wildlife has been found to be contaminated with more than 400 different chemicals. Male herring gulls and peregrine falcons have produced the female protein used to make egg yolks, while bald eagles have had difficulty reproducing in areas highly contaminated with chemicals.

It gets worse:

Scientists at Cardiff University have found that the brains of male starlings who ate worms contaminated by female hormones at a sewage works in south-west England were subtly changed so that they sang at greater length and with increased virtuosity.

Sort of an avian Freddie Mercury effect, you might say. All very ominous. But what about mammals, or even humans?

Even more ominously for humanity, mammals have also been found to be widely affected.

Two-thirds of male Sitka black-tailed deer in Alaska have been found to have undescended testes and deformed antler growth, and roughly the same proportion of white-tailed deer in Montana were discovered to have genital abnormalities.

In South Africa, eland have been revealed to have damaged testicles while being contaminated by high levels of gender-bender chemicals, and striped mice from one polluted nature reserved were discovered to be producing no sperm at all.

At the other end of the world, hermaphrodite polar bears – with penises and vaginas – have been discovered and gender-benders have been found to reduce sperm counts and penis lengths in those that remained male. Many of the small, endangered populations of Florida panthers have been found to have abnormal sperm.

Other research has revealed otters from polluted areas with smaller testicles and mink exposed to PCBs with shorter penises. Beluga whales in Canada’s St Lawrence estuary and killer whales off its north-west coast – two of the wildlife populations most contaminated by PCBs – are reproducing poorly, as are exposed porpoises, seals and dolphins.

Scientists warned yesterday that the mass of evidence added up to a grave warning for both wildlife and humans. Professor Charles Tyler, an expert on endocrine disrupters at the University of Exeter, says that the evidence in the report “set off alarm bells”. Whole wildlife populations could be at risk, he said, because their gene pool would be reduced, making them less able to withstand disease and putting them at risk from hazards such as global warming.

Dr Pete Myers, chief scientist at Environmental Health Sciences, one of the world’s foremost authorities on gender-bender chemicals, added: “We have thrown 100, 000 chemicals against a finely balanced hormone system, so it’s not surprising that we are seeing some serious results. It is leading to the most rapid pace of evolution in the history of the world.

Professor Lou Gillette of Florida University, one of the most respected academics in the field, warned that the report waved “a large red flag” at humanity. He said: “If we are seeing problems in wildlife, we can be concerned that something similar is happening to a proportion of human males.”


Indeed, new research at the University of Rochester in New York state shows that boys born to mothers with raised levels of phthalates were more likely to have smaller penises and undescended testicles. They also had a shorter distance between their anus and genitalia, a classic sign of feminisation. And a study at Rotterdam’s Erasmus University showed that boys whose mothers had been exposed to PCBs grew up wanting to play with dolls and tea sets rather than with traditionally male toys.

Communities heavily polluted with gender-benders in Canada, Russia and Italy have given birth to twice as many girls than boys, which may offer a clue to the reason for a mysterious shift in sex ratios worldwide. Normally 106 boys are born for every 100 girls, but the ratio is slipping. It is calculated that 250,000 babies who would have been boys have been born as girls instead in the US and Japan alone.

And sperm counts are dropping precipitously. Studies in more than 20 countries have shown that they have dropped from 150 million per millilitre of sperm fluid to 60 million over 50 years. (Hamsters produce nearly three times as much, at 160 million.) Professor Nil Basu of Michigan University says that this adds up to “pretty compelling evidence for effects in humans”.

As our reader and commenter Mike Zaharee might say: “Yikes!”

Despite the obvious bright spots — a golden era for musical theater, at the very least — this is clearly an extremely grave threat, and not just for makers of outboard motors and wide-screen TVs. All kidding aside (and let me assure you that with a topic like this, that isn’t so easy), a wide-scale disruption of the essential hormones that spur and enable sexual reproduction could quickly wipe out life on Earth.

And our last days will be bleak indeed: no football to watch, no more Hollywood special-effects extravaganzas or high-performance automobiles — just a grim and fading twilight of floral pillowcases, low-fat salad dressing, and Oprah.

So this is the way the world ends: not with a bang (that’s ruled out, of course) — but wimpier.

Related content from Sphere


  1. JK says

    Well at least I consider now Addofio might recognize that I didn’t mean anything “meanly” in the male sense. I’ve been subjected to chemical exposure too.

    Yes Charles, I recognize that “opinions” differ from “memories.” But while there is definitely an opinion in myself that I would prefer losing some memories – I recognize your point. Charles, I am of the opinion that I had not been “granted” the opportunity to gain certain memories would’ve made my children’s raising much better for them.

    Sometimes opinions and memories have the same source. Occasionally our opinions result in good memories. Sometimes not.

    Charles, your admonitions to me have merit. Opinions differ from memories, but sometimes the opinion shapes the memory. Then we age. I look forward to very little. Please excuse my perhaps ill chosen words. Having never met you Charles, I’m well…

    There are times when I think a lobotomy would do me good.

    Posted December 7, 2008 at 11:18 pm | Permalink
  2. Malcolm says

    Two comments in one!

    Posted December 7, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink
  3. pdg says

    with all the extends commercials on TV we ought to be able to counter act the chemical imbalances… just dump some of that stuff into the oceans and voila ! the sperm whale is ressurected!

    but seriously folks-

    I’ve been telling everyone who would listen about environmental degradation for more than 35 years…
    it may just take limp- dickness to get a reaction worth mentioning from folks-

    good luck out there!

    Posted December 8, 2008 at 12:11 pm | Permalink
  4. bob koepp says

    Check out “precocious puberty” for more encouraging news about hormone disrupters in our environment.

    Posted December 8, 2008 at 12:56 pm | Permalink
  5. JK says

    I really never noticed this either (and I do pride myself on being observant). I wonder if it’s the chemicals?

    Posted December 8, 2008 at 2:17 pm | Permalink
  6. JK says

    Thank you Bob. Thank you very much. Your advice to read up on “precocious puberty” has lifted the disgrace I’d felt at myself for asking, “who is that?” and hearing, “that is my twelve year old daughter.”

    When I was in school, girls didn’t, well sometimes the girls I attended school with didn’t get well, until about the ninth grade. When my eldest turned 11 (she’s in her 30’s now – so I don’t have to worry so much about the taste of my lecherous foot) I thought “Oh my.” Or thoughts to that effect. I suppose I should maybe apologize to her now for admonishing her, back then, “Don’t you have any friends your own age?”

    I’d asked about such things of course, but the psychiatrist was of the opinion that it was due to a healthier diet. I know better now.

    And Addofio, if you happen to be in the neighborhood of Arkansas this Thursday, drop in to Izard County. I’m hosting a Tupperware party.

    Posted December 8, 2008 at 6:05 pm | Permalink
  7. MikeZ says


    Looks like you’ve got things under control.

    – M

    Posted December 9, 2008 at 8:26 am | Permalink