I’m not much of a basketball fan, but you’d have to be out cold not to notice all the bracket-related hoop-la every March. One thing that has always struck me as odd about the NCAA tournament, though, is that to a disinterested observer, the point of the whole thing seems to be the semi-finals. The entire nation gets itself, for some curious reason, into such a tumescent state of arousal over the antepenultimate “Final Four” that the Final Two, and the Final One, seem to be, more or less, merely an afterthought. This is, as far as I know, unique in the world of sport, and if anyone cares to explain it to me I will be most grateful.
- View a Random Post
- Follow on Twitter
-
Contents
-
Meta
-
Categories
- Alison
- Apophthegmata
- Art
- Books
- Cape Cod
- Chess
- Curiosities
- Darwin and Biology
- Dualism vs. Materialism
- Foreign Affairs
- Free Will
- General
- Global Warming
- Haiku
- Immigration
- Inner Work
- Jihad
- Language
- Marginalia
- Martial Arts
- Military
- Mind and Brain
- Music and Recording
- Politics
- Pretty Good Posts
- Reason and Philosophy
- Religion
- Rubbish
- Science
- Shameless Filler
- Society and Culture
- Sport
- Technology
- The Economy
- Tomfoolery
- Uncategorized
-
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
2 Comments
(Little slow on the draw here, I know…)
I think it’s a product of the way the tournament is structured: as three “weekend batches” of matchups. (Weekend one is the “final” 64 and 32; weekend two is the final 16 and 8; weekend three — the big one — is the final four and two.)
Where there’s a long week of anticipation and hype leading up to that final Saturday of games — with its four contenders — there’s just a day and a half heading into the Monday championship. So the “Final Four” has naturally sucked up more of the media oxygen, simply by virtue of time and volume, even if it’s not actually considered the more important leg of the event.
A very reasonable analysis. Thanks, Tom!