<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oakeshott On Conservatism, Cont&#8217;d</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malcolmpollack.com/2009/11/13/oakeshott-on-conservatism-contd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2009/11/13/oakeshott-on-conservatism-contd/</link>
	<description>I go many places...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 05:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: howsurprising</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2009/11/13/oakeshott-on-conservatism-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-155400</link>
		<dc:creator>howsurprising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2009/11/13/oakeshott-on-conservatism-contd/#comment-155400</guid>
		<description>Obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2009/11/13/oakeshott-on-conservatism-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-155399</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2009/11/13/oakeshott-on-conservatism-contd/#comment-155399</guid>
		<description>If by &quot;conservatism&quot; you mean those who dogmatically resist change even when after careful consideration a proposed change can be clearly seen to be just and appropriate, then of course you are right.

Obviously that isn&#039;t the sort of conservative I would suggest that one ought to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If by &#8220;conservatism&#8221; you mean those who dogmatically resist change even when after careful consideration a proposed change can be clearly seen to be just and appropriate, then of course you are right.</p>
<p>Obviously that isn&#8217;t the sort of conservative I would suggest that one ought to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howsurprising</title>
		<link>http://malcolmpollack.com/2009/11/13/oakeshott-on-conservatism-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-155394</link>
		<dc:creator>howsurprising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malcolmpollack.com/2009/11/13/oakeshott-on-conservatism-contd/#comment-155394</guid>
		<description>The first quoted passage seems to summarize Malcolm&#039;s underlying conservative concerns quite well, I think. And such conservatism deserves respect for being wise.

Except when it is not wise, and people resist change that is just. Ending slavery. Voting rights for women. Civil rights for African Americans and Native Americans. Conservatism has *always* been on the wrong end of those fights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first quoted passage seems to summarize Malcolm&#8217;s underlying conservative concerns quite well, I think. And such conservatism deserves respect for being wise.</p>
<p>Except when it is not wise, and people resist change that is just. Ending slavery. Voting rights for women. Civil rights for African Americans and Native Americans. Conservatism has *always* been on the wrong end of those fights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
