I have often, in posts having to do with foreign policy, expressed the sentiment that it is in our interest to foster “democracy”. It has occurred to me, however, in the course of a recent conversation, that the essential point is to promote regimes that rule with the consent of the governed. I’m not sure that this is an important distinction, but it might be, so I thought I’d make it.
- View a Random Post
-
Static Pages
-
Account
-
Categories
- Alison
- Apophthegmata
- Art
- Books
- Cape Cod
- Chess
- Curiosities
- Dance
- Darwin and Biology
- Dualism vs. Materialism
- Food
- Foreign Affairs
- Free Will
- General
- Global Warming
- Guns
- Haiku
- HBD
- Immigration
- Inner Work
- Jihad
- Language
- Law
- Marginalia
- Martial Arts
- Military
- Mind and Brain
- Music and Recording
- Politics
- Pretty Good Posts
- Racist Things
- Reaction
- Reason and Philosophy
- Religion
- Rubbish
- Ruminations
- Science
- Shameless Filler
- Society and Culture
- Sport
- Technology
- The Economy
- Tomfoolery
- Uncategorized
-
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
17 Comments
I do consider this a very important point, and it clarifies for me having re-read the previous commentary. I don’t wish to get anyone mad a me here but I rather view China, being a several thousand year old, uh mostly coherent society, undergoing a massive and unique (for them) evolution.
There are going to be things (that I see personally as reprehensible) happening. However, taking the long view, I consider that there has been an unstoppable process of democratization that has begun. They may have their version of Shays’ Rebellion yet.
JK
I think it represents a substantial distinction. I thought I’d go ahead and post this without, or before, dredging up the formal political science. Note, for instance, the difference between “republic” and “democracy.” Totally abstract categorizations of forms of government are a nice heuristic place to begin one’s freshman year. One also looks at the evolution of “democracy” since ancient Athens. It bears remembering that what you are so fond of has no historical precedent. When people talk about some place “not being ready for democracy,” it’s not such an off-hand remark. And, strange as it may seem, there are some inherent problems with “democracy,” (which you might be able to beard Dick Cheney about when he soon gets a much-deserved break from running this country). I think this is a healthy step on your part away from neoconservatism : )
I’m working in the studio all day, so will have to join in later. But briefly: I realize, of course, that there are various forms of government between dictatorships and American-style democracy. The point is that the governed must have a means of expressing their consent (usually by voting in some fashion, rather than armed revolt), which is the meaningful difference I am trying to preserve, and which unites the various forms that fall under “republic”, “democracy”, “constitutional monarchy”, etc. Going back to the original Greek sense of the word, it is that rootedness in the consent of the people that I am focusing on here.
How would you characterize what I “am so fond of”? And who said I was moving away from neoconservatism?
Malcolm moving away from neoconservatism? A consummation devoutly to be wish’d.
I deliberately used the phrase “consent of those governed” in the other thread because it is a more important criterion for determining the legitimacy of a government than whether it is democratic or not.
The King of Bhutan recently announced his intention to abdicate and turn the place into a democracy. According to news reports, his people are reluctantly following his direction: they would prefer a kingdom, but voted recently in a mock election because the King requested it. I read somewhere that the Bhutanese are the happiest people on Earth. (Difficult to believe, as they have to cross the Himalayas to get to the nearest Banana Republic or Bed, Bath, and Beyond). Regardless of what happens with their experiment in democracy, it’s hard to argue that the happy Bhutanese don’t consent to be governed by their King.
I’m no expert in Imperial Japan, but I would bet that the monarchy ruled with the consent of those governed. The system worked and people went along. I wouldn’t be surprised if the populace of some Muslim countries would choose a theocracy over other forms of government.
I think that democracy is the best form of government — or, to quote Churchill, the worst one except for all of the others — but I don’t think that it is a priori better than other forms of government, provided that the others are based on the consent of the governed.
One example of a theocracy which rules with the consent of those governed is the only country on Earth with no children.
Well, right, this is the point. A people ruled by coercion are being held hostage, it seems to me, and it is arguably the moral obligation of those outside to intervene.
Are there really no children in the Vatican? There must be a few…
Apparently not.
Insert your altar boy joke here.
From democracy to not being coerced in 7 easy comments. That intervention thing’s too complicated. First, we have to figure out what to call your new bad before we know where to intervene. I guess “authoritarianism” rapidly shades into coercion. We don’t really have a lot of names for wicked governments; just a lot of people who think democracy is the only kind of good one. Actually, I always thought “neoconservative” was kind of a pejorative term : )
Insert your joke into the altar boy.
Kevin
Well, neoconservatives don’t see it as a pejorative term, though neoconservatism is hardly monolithic, any more than liberalism (another term that many see as a pejorative) is.
“That intervention thing’s too complicated”…? So, for example, the next time a Hitler is exterminating the Jews, or the Hutus the Tutsis, a few UN resolutions ought to do the trick?
Oh I see I might step into dog poop here, but since this isn’t my blog-well Malcolm will have to pay the price. I wish he didn’t know how to do payback.
If a dissident (or a few) get arrested in China. which incidentally I don’t view as a problem. If a NeoCon (provided s/he’s my type of, well) gets elected so what? If either of the two Demos or the one Repub? I don’t really recognize a dimes’ worth of difference among them.
Whether it is Locke, Voltaire, Rosseau, hell even Jefferson, whomever pays the price of being elected, with whatever ideological baggage , any of them carry (I don’t declare prescience here) has one big, mean, milk cow to pull the teats of. There is also the ingenious recent NATO inclusionary moves.
I say, or suggest, taxpayer money be utitilized on a great big bumper-car track at Camp David be built, paint the bumper cars in NASCAR colors, give George W. the “Viagra Car” and wait ten months. Oh, paint another car “Winchester Green” and paste a sticker across the handlebars, “smack that bad boy in the face.”
Think about it: we’ve only got ten months. Then somebody has to begin fixing stuff. Who(m)ever gets this oncoming job needs a bumper-car track in the Rose Garden. The Nation will forego the annual “Easter Egg Roll.” Or whatever the commensurate.
We can promise a Halliburton contract to re-paint the cars on April Fool’s Day of ’09 but let’s give the oversight to the SEC.
JK
No,
Not the SEC, they occasionally lift off their seats to pass gas.
Put the re-painting in the hands of the FAA.
JK
JK, We’ll need some time to assimilate all of that, I think. No payback is imminent, from this quarter at least.
Going back four comments, I of course meant intervention was too complicated to discuss in my comment.
Hi Jess,
Thanks for making that clear; I obviously misunderstood you. Others may have also.
I have this viewpoint that democracy is a bad way to govern a country. Not saying we have anything better, mind you, but with a democracy, how does one ever do any long-range planning?
A newly elected president spends his (or her) first year getting themselves acclimated to being in office, the next year paying back all the political debts that got him there in the first place, and then the focus is on re-election. It’s terrible for any long range planning, which is why I think the country’s healthcare and energy sectors are a mess…
China, on the other hand, can think about what their energy needs are 20 years down the road and implement the necessary policies. The bad side to this, of course, is that they don’t give a crap about the people in the way, but at least that planning can take place.
I’m thinking there must be a decent middle ground on this spectrum.
Hi Salim,
Yes, this is a well-known problem with democracies, and especially in wartime. But China and Russia’s long-term central planning have never shown terribly impressive results either. And here in the US we actually have managed to maintain some long term-projects fairly well — although others, like the Superconducting Supercollider, were victims of exactly the sort of political shifts you describe.
If you can come up with a better system, we’d all love to hear the plan, as the old song goes. But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao…