Well, perhaps “nothing here until Friday at the soonest” was overly pessimistic; I’ll squeeze in one brief item. Following on our post about the pros and cons of conversing with one’s enemies, here is a relevant item from the opinion page of today’s Times, about JFK’s unwisdom in agreeing to the Vienna summit of 1961, a decision that arguably led to the Berlin Wall, and the Cuban missile crisis.
- View a Random Post
- Follow on Twitter
-
Contents
-
Meta
-
Categories
- Alison
- Apophthegmata
- Art
- Books
- Cape Cod
- Chess
- Curiosities
- Darwin and Biology
- Dualism vs. Materialism
- Foreign Affairs
- Free Will
- General
- Global Warming
- Haiku
- Immigration
- Inner Work
- Jihad
- Language
- Marginalia
- Martial Arts
- Military
- Mind and Brain
- Music and Recording
- Politics
- Pretty Good Posts
- Reason and Philosophy
- Religion
- Rubbish
- Science
- Shameless Filler
- Society and Culture
- Sport
- Technology
- The Economy
- Tomfoolery
- Uncategorized
-
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
16 Comments
When I read that opinion piece over my morning dose of caffeine, I suspected it might pop up here.
For me, the moral of the story is that idealists (among whom I count myself) are always at risk of underestimating realists.
An interesting way of putting it, Bob.
One might also say that it was the inherent falsity of the idealistic Utopianism underlying Bolshevism that forced its leaders to be so ruthless in enforcing it — and that kind-hearted Western liberal types are always at risk of underestimating the ruthless.
Malcolm – Well, idealistic utopianism might have been a feature of bolshevism in the time of Lenin, but he wasn’t even cold in his crypt when “idealism” acquired scare quotes.
My point exactly; that was inevitable. The enforcement of classless economic equality in such systems can only be achieved by gross inequalities of power.
I’m not certain that anyone will want to read the likes of a Patrick Buchanan but: however one reads then interprets ones’ version of events is always open to debate.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26606
Actually, JK, I had linked to this article in yesterday’s post!
Sorry Malcolm,
I have been of necessity caught up in things of recent occurrence which required extemporaneous writing/communications which I had not anticipated. I did not appreciate that while my input (not related directly to waka of recent vintage) was verboten. My input concerning another part of the world was.
Forgive please, I was doing a very hasty “catch up” on what are my normal dailies.
Belay that order!
Malcolm, I see that when demands are placed upon me and I cannot properly attend to your usual outstanding commentary, I should “cease and desist” from commenting. It seems we may (again) agree to disagree.
As they say, JK, no worries!
There are several letters to the editor in today’s Times which challenge both the facts and conclusions of the op-ed piece earlier this week.
Well, that’s no surprise — how dare anyone sully the memory of JFK, who could do no wrong, or question the wisdom of engaging in “dialogue”?
I’m out of town, so haven’t seen the paper. I’ll take a look.
I don’t think Kennedy is above criticism — I don’t think anyone shies away from the fact that his administration was responsible for the Bay of Pigs, the bungled Cuban missile crisis, and our entry into Vietnam. His father and Richard Daley stole the election for him. He was a philanderer who was often on drugs.
One of the letters today suggested that he was on amphetamines when he met Kruschev. (Note to self: when negotiating with world leaders, avoid controlled substances.)
NOW PETE,
LETS NOT DISPARAGE CONTROLED SUBSTANCES IN A BROAD GENERALIZATION… THE FIRST TIME I TRIPPED I KEPT SAYING “WE GOTTA GET THIS S—T TO NIXON!”
EXPANDED CONSCIOUSNESS MAY BE A BI-PRODUCT OF SOME DRUG TAKING. SHAMANISM IS RIFE WITH TAILS OF WONDEROUS IMPOWERMENT WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ESOTERIC HERBAGE…
I CAN EASILY SEE OUR WORLD LEADERS SHARING A SPLIFF AND GETTING TO THE POINT ABOUT WORLD PEACE WITH A GRIN…MAYBE OVER SOME SNACK FOODS AND CIGARS THAT HAVE BEEN MOISTENED…WELL WE WON’T GO THERE!
IN ANY CASE GIVING PEACE A CHANCE STILL SEEMS A GOOD PLAN BY AND LARGE… JUST KEEP THE LAWYERS OUT OF IT -LOL-THEY MAY SHORT-CHANGE US ON THE CHANGES DUE…
LOVE TO ALL-PAT
Pat, what’s with the caps? No need to shout…
Disparage drugs? Moi?
Pat: I remember seeing Nixon once on acid. The thing I can’t remember is whether it was me on acid or him.
the caps were on from filling in the code letters/#’s…