The Big Picture

There is a fascinating item making the rounds today. It seems that mysterious noise in an exquisitely sensitive gravity-wave detector may in fact be an indication that our instruments are now sensitive enough to detect the granularity of spacetime itself — and the argument is a very interesting one.

The last time physicists announced that an inexplicable noise in a sensitive detector was evidence that something funny was going on was when Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were trying to build a quiet microwave antenna, back in 1964; it turned out they had stumbled on the remnant black-body radiation of the Big Bang. So probably we ought to pay attention.

The gravity-wave detector in question, near Hanover, Germany, uses laser interference between two beams pointed at right angles to each other — essentially the same idea as the Michelson-Morley experiment (arguably the most famous negative result in scientific history). The idea in this case is that any squeezing or stretching of spacetime in one direction will be visible as a change in the way the orthogonal beams interfere.

The marvelously accurate device, which can measure variations smaller than the diameter of a proton, has been troubled by random jitters. Nobody knows why — except, perhaps, a Fermilab physicist named Craig Hogan, who has a remarkable idea.

Hogan’s explanation has to do with the quantum-mechanical properties of the ‘event horizons’ that mark the boundaries of black holes. One of the objections made when Stephen Hawking announced that black holes can evaporate (by a mechanism that is a wonderful insight in itself, but we’ll leave that aside for now) was that when they are gone, they appear to have taken with them all the information they originally contained — everything about the quantum-mechanical state of the collapsed stars that formed them. But at the quantum level, information is supposed to be conserved.

It has since been shown, however, that all the information within the black hole is preserved in the patterns of quantum activity on the surface of the event horizon. In effect, there is a ‘lossless’ projection of the information inside the black hole onto its ‘skin’.

But if this is to be truly lossless, then we are saying that all the information inside the 3-D volume of the black hole is mappable onto its 2-D surface. If the ‘bits’ on the skin, then, are of the minimum possible quantum ‘grain size’ — a very small value known as the Planck length — then to make a one-to-one mapping to the contained volume, the 3-D ‘bits’ inside must be larger, because the volume of a sphere is larger than its surface. With me so far?

Hogan’s insight is that the observable Universe itself has an event horizon, namely the radius beyond which no light can have reached us since the Big Bang. If the same principle applies, then the quantum activity at the horizon, which happens in Planck-sized bits, must map the information of the entire visible Universe. But to make that possible, the bits down in here have to be a great deal larger than the Planck length. And random fluctuations at this much larger scale are exactly what is being observed in Germany.

The point? First, that our instruments may already be beginning to see things at the smallest scale possible: the inherent “grain size” of space and time. Second, Hogan’s idea, if correct, means that the entire Universe is a kind of colossal hologram.

Very heady stuff! Learn more here.

8 Comments

  1. Interesting and well-explained, Malcolm. You have a gift for clarity of expression.

    Jeffery Hodges

    * * *

    Posted January 17, 2009 at 12:48 am | Permalink
  2. Malcolm says

    Thanks, Jeffery. Me try hard, maybe explain good.

    Posted January 17, 2009 at 12:52 am | Permalink
  3. al-Jazeera says

    Apparently there’s an echo somewhere.

    At least that’s how I explained it to the cops awhile ago. Oh, and I blamed it on a guy blogging in Korea. But I did specify Pyongyang. Anyway it was both very loud and sounded remarkably like the third track, side one, of “Exile On Main Street.”

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/mysteryroarfromfarawayspacedetected

    Hey Keith, we report your infidel further problems in Arkansas… blame it on bloggers, specificaly the New York variety.

    http://www.slate.com/id/2182546/

    It caused major problems for the “Waka the heck happened to my kph dial? The official Arkansas State Police record states that “Mr Richards explained that a New York sound engineer – informed him definitively – “…there’s alot of nuts down there… they sent one to the White House, we elected one to the New York Senate, transplanted one to the South Pacific for you to fall out of… then prior to inarguating her husband, confirmed her to Secretary of State! THEN OF ALL THINGS, YOU LIST ME ON YOUR RESUME!

    Current reports indicate considerable confusion among otherwise trustworthy sources that reflect either a barroom brawl on 9’th Street, David Letterman’s “Big Pant’s” production company accussing him of “excising a midder circumscribed digit” as well as an unconfirmed that “the lovely ‘N’ refused him the car keys.”

    BREAKING NEWS – STORY AT SIX! – STAY TUNED FOR FURTHER DETAILS!

    The message is folks – Beware of Hillbillies and Waka Wakians Who’re Tired.

    Posted January 17, 2009 at 3:49 am | Permalink
  4. Big honkin’ hologram, eh? Time to exhume David Bohm!

    Kevin

    Posted January 17, 2009 at 9:50 pm | Permalink
  5. Malcolm says

    Or get bombed with David Hume.

    (Sorry, too much wine with dinner tonight, I think.)

    Posted January 17, 2009 at 10:14 pm | Permalink
  6. Too much wine? Is that . . . possible? Define “too much.”

    Jeffery Hodges

    * * *

    Posted January 18, 2009 at 3:50 pm | Permalink
  7. Malcolm says

    Actually, the total volume of wine wasn’t all that much (especially for a 100-kg specimen like me, who can metabolize alcohol the way a C-5A can metabolize jet fuel). I think that some beer and whisky might have played a more significant role.

    The point was that I generally stay away from the computer keyboard when above a certain altitude.

    Posted January 18, 2009 at 4:57 pm | Permalink
  8. Malcolm says

    That guy a few comments back who called himself Al something seemed awfully familiar.

    Posted January 18, 2009 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*