In Barack Obama’s speech at the convention last week, he presented himself as the nation’s best hope for the amelioration of a dolorous litany of woes. But is this glum tableau an accurate accounting of how most voters see the nation, and their own lives? Apparently not, according to this item in today’s Wall Street Journal.
- View a Random Post
-
Static Pages
-
Account
-
Categories
- Alison
- Apophthegmata
- Art
- Books
- Cape Cod
- Chess
- Curiosities
- Dance
- Darwin and Biology
- Dualism vs. Materialism
- Food
- Foreign Affairs
- Free Will
- General
- Global Warming
- Guns
- Haiku
- HBD
- Immigration
- Inner Work
- Jihad
- Language
- Law
- Marginalia
- Martial Arts
- Military
- Mind and Brain
- Music and Recording
- Politics
- Pretty Good Posts
- Racist Things
- Reaction
- Reason and Philosophy
- Religion
- Rubbish
- Ruminations
- Science
- Shameless Filler
- Society and Culture
- Sport
- Technology
- The Economy
- Tomfoolery
- Uncategorized
-
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
7 Comments
The American Enterprise Institute is a hard right advocacy group, so the provenance of the report might raise suspicions. More significant is that fact that its survey is completely divergent from the Consumer Confidence Index, which economists use to gauge sentiment. If people feel good about their personal economic situation, they tend to spend money more freely. It is near a record low:
http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2638068020080826
The author’s chief economic assertion (“the economy is actually growing and unemployment is still lower than it was during much of the Clinton presidency”) is demonstrably false.
Most economists think we are in a recession, defined as two consecutive quarters of economic shrinkage. Since recessions are officially announced after the fact, it is too soon to know for sure if we are in one. However, the economy — if not contracting or remaining stagnant — at best has anemic growth, which is well below the expansion in population. If you want to use the stock market as a proxy for the economy — as it is investors’ collective evaluation — then it’s useful to note that the popular stock averages are lower than they were at the turn of the century.
While the unemployment rate is about the same as the Clinton administration – the last I looked, they were within 0.1% – the author uses a misleading statistic. The unemployment rate is the percentage of people actively looking for work compared the universe of workers. It does not include people who stopped looking because they gave up, those who were downsized from full time to part time work, and the chronically unemployed.
The more useful metric is job creation, which compares how many net new jobs are actually added to the workforce. There were 23 million new jobs under Clinton, and there are about six million new jobs under Bush.
The metrics which really count for evaluating the economic health of the average American are things like median income, disposable income, net debt, and household balance sheet. On these criteria, things are as bad for the average household as they have been in a very long time.
Just saw this item on cnn.com which offers further refutation of the WSJ piece:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/09/01/workers.report.ap/index.html
Well, thanks for the spadework, Peter; you raise worthwhile objections. (I do hope that you consider the output of liberal think tanks to be of as questionable provenance as that of conservative ones.)
The point of the article, however, was about the attitude of the voters themselves, as expressed in recent polls. Do you dispute those numbers?
I’d also point out that there was a tremendous flurry of job creation during the dot-com boom of the 90’s; I’m sure many of those positions evaporated when the bubble burst.
If I may be allowed to put forth an uninformed opinion about the article…
Ms. Bowman says that the “relentless negativity of the media” accounts for the gap between the optimism of people concerning their own lives and economic futures (76%) and the lack of optimism concerning the economy of the nation (18%). This may or may not be partly true, but I doubt it can be simplified like this. The poll numbers are about perceptions, and perceptions are not always (some would say “not usually”) grounded in reality. It would seem to me that it might be more of a psychological issue than an economic issue. In other words, people are naturally optimistic about their own lives because human beings need to have some sort of hope to survive. No matter how dire things may look around us, we are convinced that somehow everything will work out for us. Kind of like how most people think that cancer, lightning strikes, and drive-by shootings are things that happen to “other people” and not them.
The economy of the country, on the other hand, is an abstract concept for most people. It’s probably safe to say that a majority of the population (myself included) doesn’t really understand the intricacies of the nation’s economy. This can be interpreted in a number of ways. Like Ms. Bowman, we could say that we need to rely on the (relentlessly negative) media for our opinions on the economy, and thus we develop warped opinions of how bad things are. On the other hand, we could also say that this disconnect between our perception of the nation’s economy and our own personal economic futures means that it is just as likely that we are being overly optimistic about own own futures because we do not understand the forces that drive the nation’s economy and how we are subject to them.
Being one of the ignorant masses, though, I couldn’t say which is more likely. I do know that things probably aren’t as simple as people on both sides of the political spectrum would like us to believe, though.
I would consider anything published by liberal think tanks to be equally suspect. Advocacy groups exist for a reason, and dispassionate dissemination of the Truth is not one of them.
Every recent poll — except this one — shows that people are apprehensive and fearful about the economy. It is inconceivable that 80% of Americans think the country is on the wrong track, but simultaneously think the economy is hunky dory. As mentioned above, the Consumer Confidence Index — which is what economists use to judge sentiment — is bouncing along the bottom.
Living in the epicenter of the dot-com boom and bust, I would certainly agree that people lost their jobs when the industry crashed. I was one of them. However, things bounced back pretty quickly, and the industry is much larger than ever. Also, the dot com biz was a very small part of the economy back in 2000 and 2001, so it had a negligible effect on the overall economy.
I don’t think the economic malaise is all George Bush’s fault (although I think his tax cuts contributed mightily to the problem). However, the malaise is very real, and the piece in the Journal does nothing to indicate otherwise.
As for the people who purportedly think the economy is in the tank but their own personal prospects are OK:
I don’t think that many of them own a home, or would like to own one. Few of them are auto workers, airline workers, or work in retail. Those who can’t pay their credit card bills, or have their home equity lines reduced by the bank, or who are uninsured probably feel less than sunny about their prospects. Those who live day to day see the price of food and fuel rise to record levels. So anecdotally and intuitively, the argument just doesn’t add up.
There are ways to phrase survey questions so you get the results you would like to see. My guess is that this survey is one of them.
Well, Peter, it seems to me that you are venturing rather far from hard data in this last comment, and I am certainly not privy to the details of Ms. Bowman’s analysis. I think we’ll have to let this one go as a case of “we report, you decide”.