Have you heard of Poe’s Law? Wikipedia defines it thus:
Poe’s law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the idea that, without a clear indication of the author’s intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism.
Now go and read this astonishing essay, by one Tanya Cohen. Savor its colossal excesses, contradictions and ironies; bathe in its monumental arrogance and its childlike, utterly unreflective solipsism. Enjoy a frisson of horror at its genial embrace of totalitarianism.
So: extremism, or parody? The former, I fear, but it gives outstanding service either way.
3 Comments
“The truthfulness or factual nature of statements should not matter. Numerous countries have ruled that completely true, balanced, and factual statements can be outlawed as hate speech …”
I knew it was leading to that.
At least the commentary on the article is uniformly negative.
The word “hate” has now become meaningless.