Ought v. Is

February 8, 2017 – 4:14 pm

Here’s tart piece by Porter on Cass Sunstein’s vision of the Constitution. (I always enjoy Porter’s astringent writing, except for those doggone sentence fragments.)

Posted by Malcolm on at 4:14 pm, filed under Politics. RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

One Comment

  1. Whitewall says

    “In the piece Cass, who was apparently given that name on purpose, takes a dim view of Scalia’s (and by extension Neil Gorsuch’s) originalist approach. Not because it fails any rational scrutiny, but because it could fail to produce liberal results.”

    Well, a liberal result could be the secession of California. If accomplished the resulting melt down would be all over the liberal side. So many votes “Gone With the Wind”. Sorry, I had to toss that in.

    Posted February 9, 2017 at 7:09 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*