Here’s an informative piece on the Flynn affair by Tyler Durden. Key point: the purpose of the interrogation of General Flynn by the FBI was never to determine the content of Flynn’s conversations with the Russians — because the FBI already had the transcripts.
I will add: just how did the FBI have these transcripts of a private conversation by a U.S. citizen, when his identity should, by law, not have been revealed? Answer: only because of the “unmasking” of General Flynn’s name in those transcripts, in the waning days of the Obama administration.
3 Comments
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/282420/
Well, I’ll give you a pass on “off-topic” for being so brief.
I have just been looking at that concealed-carry reciprocity bill. (I have, you might be surprised to hear, mixed feelings about it.) I didn’t, however, know about the skulduggery you linked to here. A pox on these people!
It should be interesting to see who goes down in that court case. The man who (may have) perjured himself, or the agency that illegally acquired evidence of perjury.
Of course, you can always use illegal evidence for investigative purposes, and only later gather legitimate evidence. But it could still set a precedent.