Motus Mentis

Following on our previous post, today we bring you a column by Angelo Codevilla about Monday’s conference in Helsinki. It begins:

The high professional quality of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin’s performance at their Monday press conference in Helsinki contrasts sharply with the obloquy by which the bipartisan U.S. ruling class showcases its willful incompetence.

Though I voted for Trump, I’ve never been a fan of his and I am not one now. But, having taught diplomacy for many years, I would choose the Trump-Putin press conference as an exemplar of how these things should be done. Both spoke with the frankness and specificity of serious business. This performance rates an A+.

Both presidents started with the basic truth.

Putin: The Cold War is ancient history. Nobody in Russia (putting himself in this category) wants that kind of enmity again. It is best for Russia, for America, and for everybody else if the two find areas of agreement or forbearance.

Trump: Relations between the globe’s major nuclear powers have never been this bad””especially since some Americans are exacerbating existing international differences for domestic partisan gain. For the sake of peace and adjustment of differences where those exist and adjustment is possible, Trump is willing to pay a political cost to improve those relations (if, indeed further enraging his enemies is a cost rather than a benefit).

In short, this was a classic statement of diplomatic positions and a drawing of spheres of influence.

Mr. Codevilla continues by examining the geostrategic status quo, and the interests that Messrs. Trump and Putin had sought to defend and advance at this conference. Then there is this:

This led to the final flourish. The Associated Press reporter demanded that Trump state whether he believes the opinions of U.S. intelligence leaders or those of Putin. It would be healthy for America were it to digest Trump’s answer: The truth about the charge that Russia stole the contents of the Democratic National Committee’s computer server is not to be found in the opinions of any persons whatever. The truth can be discovered only by examining the server in question””assuming it has not been tampered with since the alleged event. But, said Trump emphatically, those making the accusations against Russia have refused to let the server be examined by U.S. intelligence or by any independent experts. What is the point of accusations coupled with refusal of access to the facts of the matter?

The classic texts of diplomatic practice teach that diplomacy advances the cause of peace and order only to the extent that its practitioners avoid contentious opinions and stick to demonstrable facts.

The AP reporter, who should be ashamed, is beyond shame. Then again, so are the ruling class representatives who have redoubled their animus against Trump. Cheap partisanship is not all that harmful. It is the transfer of domestic partisan animus to international affairs, however, that has the potential to start wars.

Precisely so. It is often not the bellicosity of national leaders, but rather the intrigues, yearnings, and political or military cacoethes of their emissaries and generals, that start wars. (For example, in July of 1914 Kaiser Wilhelm, Emperor Franz Josef, and Tsar Nicholas were all horrified by the prospect of war, and each one of them wanted to avoid it however possible. Their generals and foreign ministers, though, persuaded them that war was inevitable — having themselves labored behind the scenes to make it so.) For this reason, in a tightly coupled world bristling with nuclear weapons, diplomacy and statecraft at the highest level are absolute necessities. That the fools and brats who control our media and so many of our political institutions are so unwise, so unlettered, and so unreflective as not to grasp this elementary historical truth is perhaps the greatest peril of our era.

Read Mr. Codevilla’s essay here.