Essential reading: Michael Anton explains, more persuasively than I’ve read anywhere else, why we must have a Trump win in 2020. You may not fully understand the scope of the calamity that awaits us if the Democrats consolidate their power; read his essay and you will.
Here.
8 Comments
Thank you for sharing this terrific, thoughtful essay.
I did not find much to quibble with. I would argue that air travel for the little people will be closed down much sooner than 2030.
Heck, the C19 hysteria has already closed off a large swath of international air travel because the lockdowns have made the US passport nearly worthless.
Anton writes: “…this essay is about what might happen should he lose.”
I am going to read this now…however, i would like to read and raise awareness about what might happen should Trump win, which i hope and pray he does.
It’s not going to be a cakewalk. These last 4 years ave been insufferable wrt “the resistance”. When Trump wins, the leftist and anarchist tantrums are going to crescendo beyond what we are seeing as a preview in the dem cities now. How the escalation develops, well, i hope the contingency planning is well underway, and that there will be a way to chart a course that avoids both massive civil unrest and forced errors, hubris and over-reaction on the part of law-and-order.
Either way, we are in for a new, volatile and unpredictable America, and her enemies’ long march will continue it’s corrosive mission.
mharko,
Yes, that’s true of course, and I’ve been saying so for years. (See this recent essay of mine at American Greatness.)
Many of us are blithely sailing into this election, still holding the old vestigial expectations that it will be clarifying and will settle things down for four years. Nothing could be farther from the truth. This election will be the “blue touchpaper”, and its aftermath is going to make 2020 so far look like 1955.
But I’d rather go into that inevitable chaos with Trump in the White House than Joe Biden’s puppet-masters.
Call me a crazy conspiracy theorist, but I’m just thinking out loud, so to speak. i cannot really imagine this as an engineered program, but at most as more of a stigmergic development. Does anyone else ever wonder if various depopulation strategies (especially of those ‘at risk’ populations over 60 yo and those with compromised health) are being floated amongst the global elite wokerati in order to eugenecize the populace to a more manageable or desirable demographic, where the targeted groups are culled out from the commons? Could be one rationale for ‘endless wars’ and plandemics that Anton says he can’t figure out.
mharko-
I don’t think you’re crazy.
Given what we have seen from the globalist elite so far I wouldn’t completely discount the idea they have a depopulation agenda.
From the C19 hysteria, one can easily get a sense that the globalist elite were hoping that C19 was going to be a great mechanism for culling the herd.
The article seems a bit hysterical, kind of like the Times calling trump a white nationalist while surrounded by zionists. If he defends Kyle Rittenhouse, then maybe. This is Trump’s America not Biden’s America where all of this is happening.This is Trump’s appointees in the justice department refusing to prosecute terrorists. His pandering to blacks and gays is so disgusting, and really counter-intuitive, you have to wonder If he’s throwing the election. Dems actively cheer the gang banging of your daughter and Republicans merely tell one of the rapists to shape up and become a good father. This has been going on for almost 60 years.
Trump on Rittenhouse defending his life after working as a lifeguard then cleaning up BLM graffiti then defending a business in Kenosha from terrorists(all in the same day mind you)-silence. In fact, because these ‘victims’ (who were convicted pedophiles and violent felons as it turns out-surprise surprise) that Rittenhouse killed were Jewish, the Trump justice department will help to go after Rittenhouse.
Trump on rapist Jacob Blake being shot after resisting arrest and threatening police- ‘not a good sight, I think people would agree.’
How can anyone see that and think Trump is anything other than a card carrying member of the uni-party? His popularity would surge 15 points if he just spoke up. His silence tells you all you need to know.
Bob,
You’re aware the first fellow that was shot was a convicted pedophile correct? Long, long rap sheet detailing all those sex offenses against minors correct?
Rittenhouse was a minor I think you’d agree?
And there were three other fellows (one armed incidentally) anyway three armed fellows chasing him down the street?
Reckon it’s just possible Rittenhouse glanced to his right and was “concerned” about what might have been in his immediate future?
https://theferalirishman.blogspot.com/2020/08/and-its-monday-while-everyone-is.html
I know I agree.
And if you haven’t yet attended to it Bob I suggest you get to it quick as you can and read the charging documents – looks to me what the prosecutors might have done was actually protective custody.