JK, wasn’t that the chemical weapons removal and disposal deal the one with the Russians running the show? Seems like I remember it that way. If so, it would be all that were turned over for disposal, leaving out the ones not turned over of course.
In the end, however, the threat of military action and a surprise offer by Russia ended up achieving something no one had imagined possible: the peaceful removal of 1,300 tons of Syria’s chemical weapons (there have been reports of stray weapons and widespread use of industrial chemicals like chlorine, but no evidence of systematic deception on the part of the Syrian government).
By October 2013, without a bomb being dropped, the Bashar Assad regime had admitted having a massive chemical weapons program it had never before acknowledged, agreed to give it up and submitted to a multinational coalition that removed and destroyed the deadly trove. From my perspective at the Pentagon, this seemed like an incontrovertible, if inelegant, example of what academics call “coercive diplomacy,” using the threat of force to achieve an outcome military power itself could not even accomplish.
Interesting Bob Sykes that Indian Punchline article because why, just this past
February, Interfax Ukraine reported that the Israeli Defense Ministry told Baltic states that it wouldn’t meet requests for third-party transfer of Israeli-made weapons to Ukraine.
9 Comments
Russians are having a rough time of it so here we get the ‘chemical attack’ narrative they used as a false flag in Syria.
About that: I recall Stephen F. Cohen calling to our attention the evidence that the Syrian gas attack was, indeed, a false-flag operation.
https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/
And as it happens … I reckon I maybe know something about what’s in that leaked stuff:
https://www.areawidenews.com/story/2101182.html
JK, wasn’t that the chemical weapons removal and disposal deal the one with the Russians running the show? Seems like I remember it that way. If so, it would be all that were turned over for disposal, leaving out the ones not turned over of course.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/obama-syria-foreign-policy-red-line-revisited-214059/
Later …
https://theintercept.com/2019/02/09/douma-chemical-attack-evidence-syria/
& then there’s this:
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/skeptics/medias-coverage-syria-april-2018-chemical-weapons-attack-disgrace-120806
It’s been all-around and all-over Whitewall, an unmitigated confused mess, this chemical weapons scary business.
But then too I suppose, depending on “interests” one helluva good PR opportunity – Some might use the term perspective management.
(Now if I can only locate that goshdarned Obama-era flashdrive!)
Lemme try sumpin here (having, in the past, experienced a link failing to stick) …
The link:
https://voxday.net/2022/04/25/this-could-not-be-verified/
Perhaps connected, the US and EU/NATO appear to be working themselves up to a major escalation:
https://www.indianpunchline.com/us-recruits-israel-against-russia/
https://thealtworld.com/alastair_crooke/the-dynamics-of-escalation-standing-with-ukraine
World War Three by summer.
Interesting Bob Sykes that Indian Punchline article because why, just this past
https://www.jpost.com/international/article-704680
So yep I reckon, it’d be a great thing to lay by a goodly stock of SPF 50,000 ’cause it looks like things are gonna go mighty incandescent.
Sell Raytheon. Buy Coppertone!
Well. Since this post is still open I reckon I’ll drop a couple links
https://www.thepostil.com/the-military-situation-in-the-ukraine/
(And as the US press hasn’t, as yet, seen fit to translate this for our consideration I’ll leave it in its Turkish form)
https://www.aydinlik.com.tr/haber/macron-subaylarini-mariupolde-olume-terk-etti-312526
“Wheels within wheels” indeed …