In ? We Trust

I’m an admirer of the philosopher Daniel Dennett. He can be overconfidently brusque and dismissive, and in particular I have parted company with him on the issue of activist atheism (more about that in a minute), but he has an enviably fertile and wide-ranging intellect. He’s also a terrific writer; in particular I highly recommend his books on Darwinism (Darwin’s Dangerous Idea) and free will (Elbow Room and Freedom Evolves).

He’s just been featured in a video at Edge.org, talking about a variety of topics. (There’s also a transcript.)

Early on in his talk he returns to the topic that first brought him to a wider audience: how the activity of the brain gives rise to the human mind. His model is still very much a work in progress. Here’s a longish excerpt:

Read More »

Gotta Look Sharp!

Spring’s on its way, guys! If you want to nail that big job interview, or just look your best at the local biker-bar, it’s time to hit the stores.

Here Comes The Sun

The National Research Council has issued a new report, considering in unprecedented depth a startling possibility: that variability in the energy output of the sun might have an effect on Earth’s climate.

Watts Up With That has posted a lengthy and detailed discussion here. (Hat-tip: David Duff.)

Meh

Well, the Oscar nominations are out, and the nation is abuzz as always.

Tell you what, though: ever since this groundbreaking film didn’t make the cut a couple of years ago, I’ve kind of lost interest.

Belief In Belief

Since emerging, chastened, from the militant atheism of my not-so-distant past, I have in recent years come round, despite being an unbeliever myself, to the opinion that wide-scale secularism is a maladaptation that sharply — perhaps even lethally — reduces a society’s fitness.

In a recent lecture at Washington University in St. Louis, George Will discussed the continuing importance, and necessary role, of religion in America. It is brilliantly done, and I urge you all either to watch or read it.

Seen With Just The Right Faces

Courtesy of Bill Keezer, here’s Victor Davis Hanson on the exculpatory blessings of hipness.

I used to be pretty hip myself, you know. After reading this, I’m starting to think that maybe I should give it another go.

Tectonics

America’s ideological landscape is like the continent itself: transected by deep fault-lines at the irregular boundaries of rigid plates. Though crushed tightly together, these great masses seek to move in different directions, and so they strain relentlessly against one another. The pressure builds, and builds — until, sooner or later, it must release itself in a destructive convulsion. In the weeks following the Newtown massacre, it has suddenly become clear that one of these fault-lines is under particularly dangerous stress.

Since Newtown, gun sales have rocketed as Americans, anticipating severe restrictions, rush to arm themselves while they still can. It seems that their concerns are amply justified, as executives prepare to act at the state and local level: New York’s governor, Andrew Cuomo, is expected to announce major new gun-control initiatives in his State of the State address tonight, and Joe Biden today hinted darkly about “executive orders” from the White House.

In announcing Biden’s remarks today, Matt Drudge provocatively accompanied his banner headline with photographs of Hitler and Stalin:

 

 

To those on one side of the fault-line, this is paranoid, inflammatory hysteria. To the rest of us, however, it is a reminder that the most profligate killers in modern history have not been private citizens, but their governments. As Hitler explained: “History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.’

A great many Americans are keenly aware of this, as were the nation’s founders. They consider themselves not subjects, but free citizens of a republic of their own making. They will consent, within limits, to be governed, but they will not be ruled. And they will not surrender their arms.

The plates press and moan and grumble. The water in the wells is rising, and muddy. Dogs and cats fidget restlessly. Farm animals are balky and skittish. Migraines are up sharply, and radios are on the fritz.

Long Ago And Far Away

From 1967: Woody Allen and William F. Buckley.

All Is Not Lost

There’s been so much focus lately on the senescence and decline of Western culture that I think it’s important to take a minute, now and then, to remind ourselves that we still possess much of great and lasting value — and that the magnificent legacy of Plato and Aristotle, of Shakespeare, Leonardo, Beethoven, Goethe, Newton, Michelangelo, Bernini, Voltaire, Galileo, Mozart, Gauss, Aquinas, Kant, Bacon, Keats, Hume, Carlyle, Chopin, Byron, and the rest of our immortal pantheon still inspires, even in the autumn of our civilization, creations of transcendent beauty.

Coarse And Strong And Cunning

Here’s a heartwarming item from the Windy City.

As Sandburg said:

“Fierce as a dog with tongue lapping for action.”

The Future Ain’t What It Used To Be

Boy, you can say that again. Here’s a glimpse from the year of my birth: cars, kitchens, and kitsch, in an unforgettable nine-minute movie.

Hat tip to Iowahawk.

The Ol’ Slush Pump, Like You’ve Never Seen It Before

I’m whipped tonight. So here’s…

A camera mounted on the slide of a trombone. Oddly entertaining.

Proto-Synth

The composer Sir Richard Rodney Bennett died this past Christmas Eve, and tonight WQXR played a selection of his works.

One of them was from his score for the 1967 film Billion Dollar Brain, and it featured an eerie, flute-like instrument. At first I thought it was a Theremin, but then I realized it must be an ondes Martenot.

If you haven’t heard of this gizmo — one of the earliest electronic instruments, among whose charming idiosyncracies is a troika of loudspeakers including one made of metal and another strung like a lyre — you should go and have a look at Wikipedia’s excellent article.

A Cautionary Tale

California, not so long ago the flagship of the American federation, has been going under for quite a while now: overfreighted with lavish entitlements, embarnacled with suffocating regulation, and holed below the waterline by demographic disintegration. Because attacking the root of the problem by reducing the expansion of government is for deep-blue California an ideological impossibility, the Golden State, its gunwales now awash, has sought to stay afloat by the only means its ruling class can imagine: siphoning even more wealth from the dwindling few who still produce any of it.

As sensible men like Thomas Sowell and Arthur Laffer have reminded us for years, however, raising taxes quickly reaches a point of diminishing returns.

Well, lo and behold: as more and more of its productive citizens and corporations abandon ship, California’s returns have done exactly that — diminished.

What’s that, America? Oh, right. Nothing to see here. Yes, we’ll move along.

Penitentes

There’s no shortage lately of the sort of topics I’d normally be commenting on. The ongoing Second Amendment “debate” is certainly one (this Vanity Fair piece deserves a good going over, for example, and I’ve piled up a lot of related material that needs organizing into a post). The eternal and stupendously useless budget war in Washington is another. There’s Al Gore’s sale of his cable network, Current TV, to al-Jazeera (the saintly Mr. Gore decided to cash out for a pile of Qatari oil money, after turning down an offer from Glenn Beck on the grounds that he was concerned about the station’s “legacy”). There’s the increasingly brazen disdain for the Constitution itself, and savage contempt for those who take it to mean what it says, that we see in the emboldened mainstream press. And so on.

I’m just too weary of it all tonight, though, to muster up much enthusiasm for the cause. Maybe tomorrow.

For tonight, then: an odd natural phenomenon, from the roof of the world.

Change We Can Believe In

In this brief item, Jim Pethokoukis weighs the various options for dealing with the looming debt-ceiling battle. Among them, in case you haven’t heard: trillion-dollar platinum coins.

Vomiting Larry

Here.

Air-Ball

On February 15th, the asteroid 2012 DA14 will be passing by at the rather intimate distance of 21,500 miles. That’s mighty close: it’s actually within the Clarke orbit used by geosynchronous communication satellites, which circle the planet 22,300 miles up.

It definitely will not hit us, say the boffins, and when it comes to this sort of celestial-mechanics stuff I’m inclined to trust them. (After all, we aren’t talking about climate forecasts here, or Ivy-League economic scapulomancy.)

If you are interested in this sort of thing, you may already know that there are two systems commonly used to assign collision-hazard values to “near-Earth objects”: the “Torino” scale, and the more complex “Palermo” scale. (In case you’re wondering about those names: the Torino scale got its name after it was introduced at a conference there, and the Palermo scale, which came along later, simply carried on the tradition of naming asteroid-hazard scales after populous Italian tourist destinations.) For vastly more information about the Palermo scale, have a look here.

This particular boulder, which is about 150 feet across and weighs something in the order of 130,000 metric tons — that is, roughly equal in size and mass to film-maker Michael Moore — would strike the Earth with an impact equal to a 2.4 megaton bomb. That’s actually pretty paltry compared to some of our more impressive thermonuclear ordnance, and anyway, it’s going to miss us. DA14 has been assigned a zero on the Torino scale, and gets a wimpy Palermo score of -3.19.

So, nothing to worry about, folks, at least this time around. But my sources tell me that there are more than a million of these smallish NEO’s whizzing around, and we only learned about this one just a few months ago. So keep an ear to the ground, or whatever.

Search Me!

In keeping with our ancient tradition, here’s this year’s selection from the searchphrases that brought readers to our doorstep in 2012:

man in chicken suit flying on hang glider
lwica lwica
race map
the boy who cried sheep
thats a moray
freedom go to hell
ice tricks
darkie toothpaste
pelicans eating other birds
no bikini in beach in iran
saucy minx
waka waka cold comfort
hes no fun he fell right over
when push comes to shore indian larry
outwash plain brooklyn
what is a moral fact
when shepherds pipe on oaten straws
holly jolly diwali
makatea terrain
the edge of love 2008
decomposing ocean sunfish
sallow face
god must love the poor
obama rowboat
bukimi no tani gensho
our father who arent in heaven
what is monsterous about heart of darkness
islam will dominate
lichen on pitch pine
gurdjieff annihilationism
bokanovskys process
zbotrz
drink while effervescing
strange railway equipment
dcduxpdswdn
behead those
may god thy gold refine
fat people are disgusting
iron wire form
eastern cod
better boners
indian harcor girls
pictures of what are the problems of a tornado
tastes like shit….but its good
donkey going to the market
beautiful maja exclusively shot by me in continuing series for
why cant the government just leave us alone
fallen pine branches
figure and ground puzzle geb number sequence 1 3 7 12 18
what up as they say in these here parts?
mission incomprehensible
fire vortex
elisabeth sabaditch wolff nude
Arctic Snorkel Long Parka
skimpy maverick uniforms
grammar cohesion chart
longitudinal estuary
bagdad pigeon
the bearded lady in cape cod mass
etymology of flivver
charming little house
schick lously
nude walking trail

This year’s winner:

what muscles do you news in waka armor

2013

Happy New Year to you all! (I know it’s a long shot, but what the heck.)

Winter Wonderland

Well, all that rain turned to snow last night. Here’s the view out the front window, looking west across a mile of woodland to the bay.

 

 

The little camera in my phone is not the best, but that new-fangled HDR software makes everything look pretty.

Service Notice

We’re sequestered in the rainy and windswept Outer Cape for the next few days, enjoying a warm fire and a little intercalary downtime with some old friends.

Back soon.

Raising The Bar

Move over, Tom Friedman! Here, from Sean Penn, is a late entry for Worst Writing of 2012.

It really is just unspeakably awful. Enjoy!

Down The Rabbit Hole

Consistent, at least.

Here.

Better Late Than Never

Best Christmas song ever. Sorry I wasn’t able to post this before the Big Day.

Merry Christmas

To all of you, with my thanks as always for reading and commenting.

I’ll make up for my own laziness at the keyboard today by pointing you to this delightful Christmas meditation by our friend Kevin Kim.

Fog Of War

According to this report, the Assad regime has deployed poison gas in Homs, killing 7 and injuring others.

The quoted source is “opposition activists”, by way of al-Jazeera, so the story may not be veridical. But if so, in we go, I’d imagine.

Santa, Shamanta

If you’ve seen Walt Disney’s Fantasia, which featured an animation of Tchaikovsky’s Christmas suite The Nutcracker, you’ll likely remember the fairy-circle of mushrooms performing the Chinese Dance. The mushrooms have white stalks, with red caps that are also speckled with white.

Such mushrooms are a common theme at Christmas, as we see in the assortment of images below:
 

 

 

 
This mushroom is the fly agaric, Amanita muscaria. They grow in cool temperate regions all over the world, and have psychoactive properties.

So what do they have to do with Christmas? Thereby hangs a tale.

Testa di Cazzo!

Here. Also, as an “extra added bonus”, a new word: ctenactinium.

Yes, A Bulwark Against Tyranny

Reader ‘Up2L8’ has added an excellent comment to the end of our “Hell On Earth” thread, in which he lists the various drafts of the Second Amendment that preceded its ratification.

Morbid Obesity

One of our foremost gloominaries is Patrick Buchanan. Today, in a ringingly despondent essay, he looks at the past and the future of the Republican Party, and considers its prospects in light of the inexorable trend, in all democracies, toward relentless government expansion and ultimate exhaustion.

His concluding remarks:

If we would see our future, we should look to Europe. There, the governments consume more than 40 percent of GDP and, in countries like France, almost 60 percent.

In Europe, the militaries have been hollowed out. Political parties face repudiation. Taxes in France have hit 75 percent. The wealthy flee. Pension promises are reneged upon. Government salaries are cut; employees laid off. Unemployment is astronomical for the young. The divisions deepen; the protests grow. Now, Europe’s banks, fearing social unrest, have started to emulate the Fed and buy up regime debt.

Looking at the West over the last century, the arc of history bends toward socialism and insolvency.

Read the whole thing here.

What Buck?

I’m working today, with no time for writing — so here are NightWatch‘s comments on the Benghazi report:

Special NightWatch Comment: The most important finding of the Accountability Review Board (ARB) on the Benghazi tragedy is that al Qaida is alive and well and living in Benghazi. The rest is pretty much well known, with a few exceptions.

As harsh as the words of the ARB Report seem about high level failures in the State Department, no one is held accountable. The Board found that mistakes were made. The report is essentially a white wash. Three people at State resigned today, but that is not the same as facing legal proceedings for civil or criminal negligence in wrongful death. The Board gave everyone a pass.

A few things that are confusing in the Benghazi report.

1.The Board found that the ambassador was responsible for mission security and he should have pushed harder for improvements. The implication is the ambassador ultimately was responsible his own death. Hmm”¦.The ambassador made at least three pleas for improved security, including the last on the day of his demise. Other parts of the report make clear that no amount of pushing to improve security would have made a difference with senior State Department leadership.

2.The Board found that mistakes were made. The use of passive voice means the Board refused to find anyone, except the dead ambassador, to blame for the mistakes. The message is that things went wrong; people were murdered, but it was no one’s fault. This is the core of the whitewash. This viewpoint evades questions of causality, incompetence, negligence and blame.

3. Intelligence did not identify a specific threat at the time, the Board found. This finding betrays a shallow understanding of intelligence warning among the Board members. The 65-year history of US national security affairs since passage of the National Security Act of 1947 shows that waiting for last minute unambiguous warning before taking precautions is waiting to die. The report lists 20 security incidents and attacks against the consulate, but found that body of information insufficient for warning, even on the anniversary of 9/11. One clear issue not mentioned in the report, and an obvious blind spot of its authors, is insight about how intelligence warning empowers decision makers to keep them safe by averting harm or increasing readiness to receive damage. Neither happened in Benghazi.

4.The Board made no finding about the importance of Allied cooperation in maintaining diplomatic security in Benghazi, according to the unclassified report. This is strange because the British, Turks and especially the Italians — all NATO allies and intelligence partners — had significantly more resources in Benghazi than the US, they said. They could have been consulted or requested to help rescue the US mission on short notice. British, Turkish and Italian foreign affairs officials said in public they were not consulted and their aid was not requested. They also said they would have responded if asked.

5.The Board found that the US military did all it could in the time available. Secretary Panetta made the point that there was nothing the US armed forces could do which would have made a difference during the time of the attack. The implication of this finding is that there is little point in positioning counter terror and emergency response teams in Italy and elsewhere in the Mediterranean basin within two hours of Libya because they apparently can make no difference in a series of terrorist attacks that lasted for seven hours. This finding looks like a disservice to the US armed forces personnel and units who train for these missions. Plus, the finding of virtual impotence is an intelligence windfall for terrorists in northern Africa.

6.The Board found that the chains of command and responsibility for the protection of the Benghazi mission were not clear and that agencies were stove-piped. This is curious because the central themes of the post 9/11 intelligence and national security reforms are integration, collegiality and collaboration. Apparently those messages, so vital to combat forces, have not reached those responsible for diplomatic security, eleven years after 9/11, and even for diplomatic missions in high risk areas.

The Board found all the things that State did wrong, but the Benghazi attacks expose basic problems in national security crisis management that run far beyond those at State. The entire national security establishment performed no better in failing to save the life of Ambassador Stevens in Libya than it did in failing to save the life of Ambassador Dubbs in 1988 in Afghanistan.

Many things changed between 1988 and 2012, but the system performed no better when it counted most. That should have been the key finding of this report.

Crikey!

Here’s a mighty close call.

Suzanna Hupp Joins The “Conversation”

I almost added this to the previous post, but it deserves a post of its own.

Do Something!

When America’s leftward “progress” encounters friction nowadays, we are told to have a national “conversation”. What is meant by the word “conversation” in this sense is something like: “the conservative opposition will now listen quietly and attentively, whilst enlightened liberals lead them through a long-overdue course of reeducation and rehabilitation. They may then speak, so as to be able to declare their assent.”

(Sometimes the phrase is “national dialogue“. The meaning is the same.)

The “conversation” we are supposed to be having now is, of course, about gun control. (Young Maria Gamez, sadly, won’t be joining us.)

Occasionally, some troublemaker refuses to receive his instruction in respectful silence, and is even so insolent as to raise reasonable objections to the content of the course material.

The “conversation” then goes like this, or this.

Here are a few points that might be worth making, if we can get a word in edgewise.

Finally, once we have got everyone in line, here are some procedures that every good Eloi should follow in the unlikely event of any further unpleasantness.

Just in: leading the charge on tougher gun laws will be Joe Biden.

Congress

This is amazing. From XKCD cartoonist Randall Munroe.

Web Of Deceit

Here’s a new one: a spider that builds decoy spiders.

West Meets East

I just realized I had neglected to note the passing of the great Ravi Shankar, who died last week at the ripe old age of 92.

He was for me, of course, as for everyone else who was young in those days, the one who opened the door to the treasure-house of Indian music. I first heard his music by way of his association with, and influence upon, the Beatles, but once I had acquired the taste I wanted more.

In 1968 I bought a mind-boggling album (twelve-year-old aspiring musicians have easily bogglable minds, and in those heady days there was much to be boggled by) called West Meets East, a collaboration between Mr. Shankar and the violinist Yehudi Menuhin. It was aptly named, because it was really this record that brought me fully into contact with the richness of Indian music — which up till then had just been some droning guitar-like sounds on a few Beatle records (though the opening cut of side two of Sergeant Pepper’s had given me my first real inkling that there was more to it than that).

Here you go, then: Swara Kakali, from West Meets East.

Whew! I still get goosebumps when those tabla start to play.

Coda

With a hat tip to our friend Jeffery Hodges, here’s an excellent survey of the moribund and incoherent state of American conservatism. It is not a cheery picture.

Constructor Theory

From a fascinating interview with physicist David Deutsch:

There’s a notorious problem with defining information within physics, namely that on the one hand information is purely abstract, and the original theory of computation as developed by Alan Turing and others regarded computers and the information they manipulate purely abstractly as mathematical objects. Many mathematicians to this day don’t realize that information is physical and that there is no such thing as an abstract computer. Only a physical object can compute things.

On the other hand, physicists have always known that in order to do the work that the theory of information does within physics, such as informing the theory of statistical mechanics, and thereby, thermodynamics (the second law of thermodynamics), information has to be a physical quantity. And yet, information is independent of the physical object that it resides in.

I’m speaking to you now: Information starts as some kind of electrochemical signals in my brain, and then it gets converted into other signals in my nerves and then into sound waves and then into the vibrations of a microphone, mechanical vibrations, then into electricity and so on, and presumably will eventually go on the Internet. This something has been instantiated in radically different physical objects that obey different laws of physics. Yet in order to describe this process you have to refer to the thing that has remained unchanged throughout the process, which is only the information rather than any obviously physical thing like energy or momentum.

The way to get this substrate independence of information is to refer it to a level of physics that is below and more fundamental than things like laws of motion, that we have been used thinking of as near the lowest, most fundamental level of physics. Constructor theory is that deeper level of physics, physical laws and physical systems, more fundamental than the existing prevailing conception of what physics is (namely particles and waves and space and time and an initial state and laws of motion that describe the evolution of that initial state).What led to this hope for this new kind of foundation for the laws of physics was really the quantum theory of computation. I had thought for a while that the quantum theory of computation is the whole of physics. The reason why it seemed reasonable to think that was that a universal quantum computer can simulate any other finite physical object with arbitrary accuracy, and that means that the set of all possible motions, which is computations, of a universal computer, corresponds to the set of all possible motions of anything. There is a certain sense in which studying the universal quantum computer is the same thing as studying every other physical object. It contains all possible motions of all possible physical objects within its own possible diversity.

Read the rest (with video) here.

Hell On Earth

In the wake of the Newtown shootings, the usual voices on the Left have resumed their call for the nation to “do something” about guns. In a longish post, here are some contrarian opinions from around the blogosphere, and a few observations of my own.

Read More »

From The Abyss

There was an eruption of unspeakable horror, of pure Evil, today in Newtown, Connecticut. From what I understand many small children — 18, according to the latest report — have been shot to death.

There will be bitter political debate in the days to come — such as we have never seen before, I think — but for the sake of human decency, please, not today. Hold your children close, if you have them, and reflect on what it means to be human, and what it means to be alive.

Take Good Heed Not To Judge Me Ill

Laura Wood, the Thinking Housewife, brings to our attention France’s newest public institution: the National Observatory of Secularism. Its function is to train the State’s benevolent and watchful Eye upon “religious pathology”.

Whether secular pathology will be detected as well is left to the reader’s intuition.

Great And Small

Courtesy of Reuters:

 

Reminder

“Liberty and democracy are eternal enemies, and every one knows it who has ever given any sober reflection to the matter. A democratic state may profess to venerate the name, and even pass laws making it officially sacred, but it simply cannot tolerate the thing.”

– H.L. Mencken, the Baltimore Evening Sun (13 April 1925)

 

In The Beginning…

If you’re like me, you’ve been asking yourself lately: when did people first make cheese?

Here’s your answer.

Weissrein!

Today Dennis Mangan comments on the actor Jamie Foxx’s recent opening monologue on Saturday Night Live, which I hadn’t seen until just now. It is startlingly frank (I realize I shouldn’t be startled by this sort of thing any more, but I’ll admit I was) in its triumphalist antipathy toward white people. At one point Mr. Foxx, describing his role in some movie he’s just made, says that he gets to “kill all the white people”. Beaming, he asks the audience: “How great is that?”

It hardly needs mentioning, but if any white person had made such a comment in reverse (on the immensely implausible assumption that a movie might even be in theaters today in which a white protagonist slaughters black people), he would be dragged into the public square to kneel and grovel for forgiveness, and his career would be over. (See, for example, Michael Richards). Yet a grinning Mr. Foxx can do this on one of America’s premier network television programs and elicit nothing but howls of approval from the audience.

To put this as delicately as I can: if history and human nature are any guide, at some point this may lead to unpleasantness. Of course, history and human nature may in this case not be a reliable guide, because the blithe acquiescence of Western, Anglo-European culture in its own obliteration has, as far as I am aware, no historical precedent.

Family Matters

Townhall.com has published a fascinating article about household income inequality in America, based on a novel analysis of historical income data. Applying the mathematics of log-normal distributions to census data for the incomes of working and non-working individuals of both sexes, the authors found a way of simulating various household combinations that allows them to parse out the median incomes for each. By combining these results with the Gini index of income inequality, they conclude that rising household income inequality in America is due to the steady increase of single-person households.

The core of our civilization has always been the traditional family. As that crumbles, so does everything else.

Our Minds Are Dark, Our Wills Weak, Our Hearts Foul

Get thee post-haste to the Maverick Philosopher‘s website, where our friend Bill Vallicella has inked a splendid meditation on how very much we have to be humble about.

The best turn of phrase: “…an early weaponization of the space between chucker and effer.”

Too much the gentleman, he, to make it rhyme.

Food For Thought

Here’s something I didn’t know until just now: squids have doughnut-shaped brains, with the esophagus going right through the hole.

See for yourself.