Legal And Rational

Charles Krauthammer has published today a fine piece on the Israeli blockade of Gaza. An excerpt:

[A]s Leslie Gelb, former president of the Council on Foreign Relations, writes, the blockade is not just perfectly rational, it is perfectly legal. Gaza under Hamas is a self-declared enemy of Israel ”” a declaration backed up by more than 4,000 rockets fired at Israeli civilian territory. Yet having pledged itself to unceasing belligerency, Hamas claims victimhood when Israel imposes a blockade to prevent Hamas from arming itself with still more rockets.

In World War II, with full international legality, the United States blockaded Germany and Japan. And during the October 1962 missile crisis, we blockaded (“quarantined’) Cuba. Yet Israel is accused of international criminality for doing precisely what John Kennedy did: impose a naval blockade to prevent a hostile state from acquiring lethal weaponry.

Oh, but weren’t the Gaza-bound ships on a mission of humanitarian relief? No. Otherwise they would have accepted Israel’s offer to bring their supplies to an Israeli port, be inspected for military materiél, and have the rest trucked by Israel into Gaza ”” as every week 10,000 tons of food, medicine, and other humanitarian supplies are sent by Israel to Gaza.

Why was the offer refused? Because, as organizer Greta Berlin admitted, the flotilla was not about humanitarian relief but about breaking the blockade, i.e., ending Israel’s inspection regime, which would mean unlimited shipping into Gaza and thus the unlimited arming of Hamas.

Israel has already twice intercepted weapons-laden ships from Iran destined for Hezbollah and Gaza. What country would allow that?

But even more important, why did Israel even have to resort to blockade? Because blockade is Israel’s fallback as the world systematically delegitimizes its traditional ways of defending itself ”” forward and active defense.

Read the rest here.

The Milk Of Human Kindness

Here we learn that “lactose intolerance” is a racist slur.

Homework

Here’s the Obama administration’s new National Security Strategy. Let’s all have a look.

I Think It’s Working…

Just got this email bulletin from the Washington Post:

——————–
News Alert: Gulf Coast oil cap in place over blown-out well
09:55 PM EDT Thursday, June 3, 2010
——————–

A cap is in place over the Gulf of Mexico gusher, live video footage provided by the company showed Thursday night, but the spewing oil made it very difficult to tell if the cap was fitting well.

More information here.

Hmmm. I began to imagine other reports in a similar vein:

Fire-retardant chemicals have been applied to the conflagration, but the towering wall of flames made it difficult to tell if the blaze had been extinguished.

Or perhaps:

The defenders had recently fortified the citadel with a moat, hornworks, and bastions, but the hordes swarming over the walls made it impossible to judge their effectiveness.

How about:

It was simply too dark to see if the lights were on.

Well, as the blind man said, we shall see.

*                *                *

Update, 6/4: this morning I learnt that oil was expected to flow through the cap after it was installed. Apparently there are relief valves that will be closed once suction pipes are attached. My jeering and japery may, it seems, have been premature.

Things We Said Today

Paul McCartney was honored with the Library of Congress Gershwin Prize for Popular Song at the White House yesterday. He is only the third person to receive it, and he certainly deserves it. (The first was Stevie Wonder, and the second was Paul Simon, who by the way performed at our son’s commencement exercises two weekends ago.)

But reading about the ceremony in the Times today, I was dismayed to see the following from Sir Paul:

A few minutes after the concert, Mr. McCartney returned to the microphone, thanking the Library of Congress and adding, “After the last eight years, it’s great to have a president who knows what a library is.’

It is one thing to express, as Mr. McCartney did at other moments during the evening, fawning and fulsome praise for President Obama. But for an Englishman, while accepting an award of national honor from the American people, to stand in the White House and gratuitously insult a former President (and one, for that matter, whose wife holds a master’s degree in library science) is appallingly bad form. Very, very bad form indeed.

Mr. McCartney should be ashamed of himself, and he owes Mr. Bush, and the rest of us, an apology.

They Also Serve

Here is a fine little essay by Thomas Sowell on the seasonal tide of self-congratulating commencement speeches by public “servants”. So good is it, in fact, that I reproduce it in its entirety below.

Read More »

Fog In Channel, Continent Cut Off

To those of you who send me comments and other tidbits by email: I’ve been having technical problems, since Wednesday morning, that prevent me from accessing my main email account from my network at the office. So far I have resisted acquiring an email-equipped cell-phone, but these corporate-firewall issues may push me over the brink, especially since I seem to be spending awfully long hours at the office lately.

Frequent emailers will know that I generally respond promptly; until I figure out how to sort this out, though, I am incommunicado until I get home each evening.

This sort of thing is terribly annoying. I must remind myself that when I was a boy there was just the daily mail, and a telephone statically affixed to the kitchen wall (without even an answering machine, which had yet to be invented). Somehow we managed, though now I can’t imagine how.

Time In

It’s almost midnight on Tuesday, and we’ve just got back from a long (and, as far as the news goes, completely tuned-out) weekend, with a lot of catching-up to do. So for tonight, here’s an entertaining site that I ran across while putting together last week’s Martin Gardner post. Don’t miss the Mandelbulb.

Lessons Learned, And Not

National Review has just reposted a fine, and scathing, editorial published on May 6, 1961, in the aftermath of the doomed Bay of Pigs invasion — which failure NR editors Buckley et al. ascribed to a “failure of will”, and a reluctance to offend “World Opinion”:

Have we learned? There is always reason to hope. But there is also always reason not to hope. It was said in 1956 that Eisenhower learned his lesson at Geneva in 1955, that summiteering was unprofitable ”” and then after Budapest in 1956, that he had finally learned his lesson about the Russians ”” and then there was Camp David ”” and then the Paris Summit in May: Eisenhower never learned…

…We need to remind ourselves from time to time that there is no reason why we should not win this war. We are bigger and, potentially, we can fight with the strength of free men. The weakness we showed last week was of our own making. Anyone looks ridiculous who lies, deceives ”” and is ineffectual. The Soviet Union lies and deceives ”” and murders and kills and enslaves and pounds shoes on desks in glittering surroundings: but somehow never appears ridiculous, because the assertion of the will, the harnessing of history to that will, is the business of men; and before such manliness, other men give way.

“…the assertion of the will, the harnessing of history to that will, is the business of men; and before such manliness, other men give way.” This was 1961. Can you imagine anyone in the West assessing global affairs in those terms today?

The Cerebral Michelangelo

From my friend Jess Kaplan (not to be confused with commenter JK) comes a very interesting item about just what’s painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. Here.

An Inconvenient Truth

It’s a busy stretch just now: I’ve been putting in long days at work, and will be traveling tomorrow evening. So for tonight, here’s a timely piece by Wellfleet resident John Stossel about the realities of “green energy”. He reminds us that it is unrealistic to imagine that there is anything in prospect anytime soon that is going to replace oil. It’s a sad fact, given the ongoing catastrophe in the Gulf, and the hostile Islamic regimes that would fail overnight were it not for our dependence on their only marketable asset, but there it is.

Public Access

One of my oldest and closest music-biz pals is the great jazz guitarist Steve Khan. Here’s an interview he did recently for the new Inside Musicast website.

Martin Gardner, 1914-2010

I was saddened to learn today that the great Martin Gardner had died on Saturday at a rest home in Norman, Oklahoma. He was 95.

For those of you who didn’t know him, Martin Gardner was universally regarded by those who did as one of the brightest lamps of the 20th century. He was best known as a “recreational mathematician”, but he was also a philosopher, novelist, literary critic, and prominent skeptic. He wrote over 70 books.

I’ve been a fan of Gardner’s for as long as I can remember. When I was a young boy my father, a scientist, had a subscription to Scientific American (that was back when it was a serious publication), and knowing that I loved puzzles, he suggested that I might enjoy Mr. Gardner’s Mathematical Games column. (It ran from 1956 to 1981, when it was replaced by Douglas Hofstadter’s column Metamagical Themas.) I was immediately drawn in by Mr. Gardner’s infectious enthusiasm and explanatory clarity, and thanks to him I developed a lifelong fascination with logic and math. His column was where I first learned about tilings, ternary numbers, integer spirals, bouncing-ball problems, parity checks, hexaflexagons, cellular automata, cycloids, Klein bottles, graph theory, the logic puzzles of Lewis Carroll, the multifarious brain-twisters of Sam Loyd, and whatever else had occupied his playful and infinitely capacious mind in the preceding weeks.

I have several of his books on my shelves. The collections of mathematical diversions are an enduring pleasure, but three others that stand out in particular are his 1957 book Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science, which was the beginning of his career as a skeptical debunker of pseudoscientific mumbo-jumbo; The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener, from 1983, in which the 69-year-old Gardner explained, as he put it, “what I believe and why”; and a wonderful book on the fascinating subject of symmetry and chirality, called The Ambidextrous Universe.

Though he was never trained as a mathematician — his degree from the University of Chicago was in philosophy — his long years as the world’s greatest amateur, and his restless curiosity about anything and everything mathematical gave him a matchless overview, and he was sought out by professionals the world over as a kind of one-man clearing-house of mathematica new and old. As a generalist he was probably without peer.

I knew he was in his nineties, and had just thought about him no more than a few weeks ago with the realization that he would soon be gone. But it is still sad to know that this mischievous, endearing, and coruscatingly brilliant intellect is with us no more.

You can read his obituary here. And while you’re at it, just go online and Google his name: like the man himself, it will take you all sorts of interesting places.

Service Notice

We’ll be away all weekend, joining our son at his college graduation. Back in a few days.

Haute Cuisine

In yesterday’s paper was an article about how prevalent marijuana use is amongst professional chefs. (According to my wide-ranging observations, they could also have written the same article about professional writers, artists, dancers, musicians, psychologists, lawyers, accountants, etc.). It’s an interesting story, and remarkable for how casually marijuana use, which is after all still illegal, is discussed by all the interviewees.

High time we just legalized the stuff, if you ask me. It is at this point completely “mainstream”, and keeping it illegal breeds contempt for the law, feeds the Mexican drug cartels, is an infringement of personal liberty, and deprives the US economy of a fantastically lucrative source of tax revenue.

Anyway, read the story here.

The Early Kagan

Readers who have been trying to get a handle on Elena Kagan may find this interesting: her baccalaureate thesis from Princeton, written in 1981. In it she makes a searching examination of the causes leading to the self-destruction of the American Socialist Party in the years following the First World War. She concludes with the following:

Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism in New York to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America. Radicals have often succumbed to the devastating bane of sectarianism; it is easier, after all, to fight one’s fellows than it is to battle an entrenched and powerful foe. Yet if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope.

This was a long time ago, of course, when she was much younger (as were we all). I wonder how much has changed.

Us And Them

An article in Monday’s Times describes the current state of affairs in Rwanda. It has been a full sixteen years since the challenges of multiculturalism got out of hand there, but for some reason the blessings and benefits of Diversity — despite the vigorous application of exactly the sort of enlightened government measures that always become necessary when social heterogeneity reaches a certain level — have as yet failed to materialize.

We read:

As presidential elections approach and the nation has grown more repressive, the campuses have become tense. Students say that they are being watched, and that the laws aimed at suppressing ethnic differences have made them afraid to speak openly.

How awful that must be: imagine a college campus where people are discouraged from speaking openly, for fear that someone might take offense!

While students make acquaintances based on their interests, he says, campus life ultimately divides itself along linguistic lines, and friendships across those lines are rare.

Yes, language has an almost matchless power to divide, and unite, human societies. How fortunate we are, here in America, that everyone agrees on the importance of cultural oneness for the continued well-being of our great nation, with English as a vital, unifying aspect of our commonality.

Colleges have reconciliation clubs, started on government advice ostensibly to combat ethnic hatred, which reinforce the new non-ethnic narrative. Stickers posted on walls urge unity and warn against “divisionism’…

Good idea! That should work. Fortunately, the tendency for human beings to associate along racial and ethnic lines, and the tensions that can arise from that thoughtless habit, are just the sort of things — nothing more than superficialities, really — that are easily corrected by government-sponsored remedial instruction, and stickers.

Students say the universities are crawling with spies.

Again, reason to be thankful you aren’t attending college in Rwanda. Just imagine if some innocent remark you made to a friend about this or that group of people — in presumptive confidence, or maybe in an e-mail — were reported to the authorities, and then used against you. Just imagine!

Anyway, you can read the whole article here, and you can thank your lucky stars we’ll never have any of these problems here at home.

Fair And Balanced

As a counterpoise to the impression I might have given in a recent post, here is what all that Russian “directness” leads to at home.

All The Nous That’s Fit To Print

The New York Times has introduced a philosophy-blog. It’s called The Stone. It will be interesting to see how it goes.

Change We Can Be Leavin’

Amongst the many blessings conferred upon a reluctant polity by the recent health-care bill is a little “Easter egg” you may not yet have heard about. (To be fair, I suspect that most of the solons who poked this egregious legislation down our gullets didn’t know about it either, though that hardly redounds to their credit.) It is a grotesquely burdensome requirement that all businesses making purchases totalling more than $600 per annum from any vendor will now have to send that vendor a 1099 form.

An article at Human Events, by Deroy Murdock, assesses the damage. We read:

Form 1099 today applies only to independent contractors, e.g. a graphic artist who earns $1,000 for designing a sales brochure. Come 2012, ObamaCare vastly will expand 1099s to sellers of goods as well as services, and not just the self-employed, but also businesses ”” large and small.

“This will create a two-fold whammy for small businesses,’ predicts Rep. Dan Lungren (R ”“ California) who is sponsoring legislation to repeal this provision. “They will have additional accounting costs that will consume time and money,’ Lungren tells me. “They will be required to keep a running tab with every vendor, all the way from restaurants to anything they buy ”” a piece of equipment, an airline ticket, or a hotel room. And when they reach the $600 threshold, they will be required to file 1099s for each of those vendors.’

“Second,’ Lungren adds, “small companies most likely will see less business. Most people will streamline this process by moving to large vendors. Why go to your local hardware stores, since you will have to keep track of several tabs? Why not go to one big box store? As for restaurants, why not go to the chain rather than local restaurants?’

An independent contractor, for instance, will find it easier to consolidate his purchases and send one 1099 to Home Depot, rather than sprinkle his spending among smaller outlets, track those expenditures, and then submit multiple 1099s for Joe’s Ladder Company, HammersRus, Kaminstein Bros. Paints, and Wally’s Wallpaper Warehouse.

“On average, small businesses spend more than $74 per hour on meeting their compliance obligations, which represents the most expensive paperwork burden that the federal government imposes on small business owners,’ states Brad Close of the National Federation of Independent Business. Imagine that a small company sacrifices the equivalent of just two hours each month to perform these calculations and file 1099s at tax season. Every year, this would cost ”” get this ”” $1,776.

Read the article here. I hate to wish the summer away, but November, and the possibility of repeal, can’t come soon enough.

Strong Horse

One of the reasons America is declining in the world is that we (and the rest of the effeminized West) are perceived by our foes and rivals, rightly, as having lost our virile resolve. We are generally more concerned with “being better” than our enemies than actually defeating them, and so we court-martial Navy Seals for being mean to brutal terrorists. Upon the massacre of our soldiers by a jihadist within their ranks, the Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army laments the event as a setback for diversity. Military decorations, once given for valor, honor, and courage under fire, are now to be awarded for “courageous restraint“. So wary are we of giving offense, even to those who would destroy us, that our highest officials shrink even from naming our enemies; meanwhile we cravenly permit the construction of a towering mosque in Lower Manhattan, at a site that is, as John Derbyshire put it: “just a stone’s throw — or to modify the metaphor slightly, an airline passenger’s body-part trajectory — from Ground Zero.” (If you’d like to attend the groundbreaking ceremony, I hear it’s scheduled for September 11th, 2011.)

Not so — never so — the Russians, who look after themselves, and don’t obsess the way we do about whether the rest of the world loves them. Attack them, and they will see to it that you think twice before doing so again (if you are still around to think at all). Here they dispose, with characteristically unsentimental directness, of a captured pirate mother-ship.

Discussion, Discussed

Our cyber-friend Jeffery Hodges has just published, and posted at his website, a thoughtful article on the intellectual and cultural requirements for productive discourse. The subject is of particular interest to Jeffery, who is a college professor in Korea — where, in keeping with Confucian social tradition, to question one’s superiors is to get above one’s station, and is often regarded as an insult.

Read it here.

Walter Sear, 1930-2010

I note with heartfelt sorrow the death of the great recording engineer Walter Sear, who died on April 29th from complications of a fall. (Somehow I missed his obituary notices at the time, and have only just heard the news.)

Walter occupied a very special place in the New York recording community. Having never joined the digital revolution that transformed our industry in the 1980’s, he was our foremost exponent and archivist of analog equipment and techniques — and his legendary studio, Sear Sound, was, in equal measure, laboratory, museum, and shrine. He had an incomparable collection of “vintage” equipment: a Neve 8038 console, half-inch vacuum-tube Studer tape machines, hundreds of rare microphones, original Moogs and Theremins, and much, much more.

I did many sessions at Walter’s studio over the years — it was one of the best places on earth to make recordings of music — and Walter was always a welcoming, avuncular presence. He always took an interest in what the engineers were doing, and loved to talk shop. Often he’d invite me to stay behind after a date to try out some new mike or piece of equipment he’d just added to his collection, and many times I used, on his recommendation, some exotic antique or other that he had recommended for a particular application — always with happy results. (I also have, somewhere, a file he sent me containing hundreds and hundreds of “musician jokes” that he had collected over the years.)

Walter Sear loved music, loved audio, loved recording, and loved engineers — and there isn’t a single one of our little brotherhood that didn’t love him right back. He was sui generis, and irreplaceable. His death leaves yet another aching hole in the hearts of those of us who remember what it used to be like to record music in New York City, and we will miss him very much. My sympathies go out to Roberta and the staff.

Thanks for everything, Walter. Rest in peace.

Blurb For Derb

Here’s a pungent edition of Radio Derb, starting with an poignant obituary for England.

Life In The Fast Lane

Readers, what do you make of this?

Over Here, Diogenes

Stopping by Gates Of Vienna today, I read an item about yet another “interfaith dialogue” conference, this time in Macedonia. Given that religious acrimony has been such a mighty engine of sanguinary conflict throughout all of recorded history, people generally take a hopeful view of these little pow-wows, and their participants, for rising above the fray to engage the “Other”, are customarily treated to a generous helping of public praise.

Not from me, however; I’ve always thought these things generally get nowhere. Although relatively enlightened and supple-minded envoys may on occasion gesture sincerely toward one another, what counts in the real world is the center of gravity of each of the enormous religious communities they claim to represent — and those rarely budge. Religions are incompatible in ways that matter, and no amount of diplomatic jaw-jaw is ever going to change that. Moreover, religions bind and anchor distinct human populations, providing the social glue and self/other immune- responses that help them compete successfully against rival communities, and none of that is about to change, either. And in the particular case of the most expansionist, totalitarian major religion of them all, these conferences simply provide plausible cover, and deflect sensible wariness.

Read More »

“The Courage To Do Nothing”

Last week The Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming held a hearing on “The Foundation of Climate Science”. The loyal opposition was represented by Lord Christopher Monckton, who made a persuasive technical case (see here) and gave a splendid performance. Here’s a glimpse:

From Lord Monckton’s testimony:

Warming at the very much reduced rate that measured (as opposed to merely modeled) results suggest would be 0.7-0.8 K (1.3-1.4 F°) at CO2 doubling. That would be harmless and beneficial ”“ a doubling of CO2 concentration would increase yields of some staple crops by 40%. Therefore, one need not anticipate any significant adverse impact from CO2-induced “global warming’. “Global warming’ is a non-problem, and the correct policy response to a non-problem is to have the courage to do nothing.

There are clips of the other witnesses here, and you can download video of the entire hearing here. Read also Rep. James Sensenbrenner’s trenchant opening remarks, here.

Why Are We Living Longer?

We direct you to an intriguing item at Mangan’s, about a “slow-aging” subpopulation that had previously been masked by youthful deisease and trauma. Here.

The Day The Music Died

I realize that the recent flooding in Nashville has imposed a frightful toll of hardship in all the many ways that such disasters always do, but as a musician and recording engineer I find this particularly poignant.

Doesn’t Add Up

Over at NRO, Jonah Goldberg and others are wondering about something that has been puzzling me too: if Faisal Shahzad was trained by jihadis in Pakistan, why did he make such a crappy bomb? I mean, the guy even had an engineering degree, for crying out loud. He used the wrong kind of fertilizer, propane tanks with the valves closed, little firecrackers to set it off, and had a couple of clocks wired up to nothing. A resourceful six-year-old could have made a better bomb. What gives?

Discipline

Mark Twain, as posthumously quoted in the Montreal Gazette, April 25th, 1935:

When a host asked Mark Twain if he would like a drink before breakfast, the humorist replied:

“Thanks, I do not care for a drink for three reasons. In the first place, I never drink before breakfast. In the second place, I am a prohibitionist, and, in the third place, I have already had three drinks this morning.”

Internal Affairs

A topic I’ve heard people kvetching about lately is the prevalence of unpaid internships for aspiring youngsters. The complaint is that they violate the spirit of minimum-wage laws, and drive out competition for entry-level jobs.

I’ve written about minimum-wage laws before; they seem beneficent enough, but they have a darker side, and darker origins than most people imagine.

Meanwhile, John Stossel weighs in on internships here.

Now That’s Diversity!

David Brooks had a daring item in the Times today, in which he came awfully close (though stepping back from the brink) to saying some awfully unsayable things. But I’m not in the mood for more of this stuff tonight (if I were I’d likely be rounding on Mayor Bloomberg, too, for his flurry of idiotic and insulting remarks over the past few days.) If you’d like to read some commentary on the Brooks piece, Steve Sailer did a good job here, and it was picked up at the National Review as well, here.

No, tonight I’m thinking about aliens, but not the ones you might imagine.

Read More »

Jim Kalb On Inclusiveness

Today I read, at the new conservative/HBD website Alternative Right, an essay by Jim Kalb called The Effects Of Inclusiveness. A sample:

No person or society can realize all human possibilities. We are finite creatures who realize ourselves–become good, happy, productive, vibrant, and creative–by becoming something in particular. Since we are social, that particularity requires social particularity.

Inclusiveness denies that human need and so deprives human life of the environment it needs to thrive. A single social scheme, the inclusive society, has to apply equally to everyone. All social institutions have to be transformed so they make equal use of every possible kind of person. Society becomes a unitary machine, its members interchangeable components.

We must all be transformed. Swedes and Italians are different, and their differences make workplaces different. Inclusiveness insists on changing that and making each equally fitted to all. Every soccer mom, drag queen, black Muslim, Christian fundamentalist, and Hmong immigrant must be retailored to fit all settings equally. Those who resist can be treated as confused, ignorant, psychologically deformed, or evil.

The result isn’t diversity but a single liberal way of life variously accessorized in ways not allowed to matter. The attempt to put diversity first destroys it.

That should not be surprising. Inclusiveness is the absolutism of a rationalized commercial and administrative system. It lets bureaucracy and markets retain their hold on us, but cuts down ethnic culture to ethnic-themed fast food, religion to a poeticized version of liberal ideals, and marriage to a sentimentalized recognition of almost any sexual connection. Under such circumstances human life becomes not vibrant and diverse but boring and trivial.

In theory we are free to hold privately whatever ideals of life we want. The freedom is of doubtful substance, since private ideals of life have consequences in the lives of others. For that reason a growing range of opinions — white solidarity is one example, disapproval of homosexuality is fast becoming another — are now beyond the pale even in private.

It turned out that this article was the fifth in a series on the topic. Mr. Kalb is a solid thinker and writer, and in these essays he presents his case — which by the standards of present-day social and political orthodoxy is the purest blasphemy — with persuasive clarity. Regardless of your political viewpoint, they are well worth your time. Here they all are: I’m still reading through them myself.

El Norte

Here’s another pointed essay about the Arizona brouhaha: What If Arizona Were Quebec?

Mistaken Identity

In a speech at the University of Michigan on Saturday, President Obama castigated critics of recent government excesses, reminding them that “government is us”.

This seems innocent enough, but in fact it is chilling. The Founders saw a powerful central government as an unfortunate and dangerous necessity, the only way to administer certain tasks that cannot be performed by individuals. The apparatus of Federal government was to be a machine that existed solely in service to, and at the pleasure of, the free citizens of the United States. But here Mr. Obama tells us, explicitly and revealingly, that in his mind the State and the people are one.

“Government is us.” It is difficult to see how this proposition differs in any meaningful way from Mussolini’s words: “All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.”

Extra Nipples

Much has been written in recent years about the taming and effeminization of the Western male. Though there are still pockets of resistance, the dismal process proceeds apace, and appears even to be accelerating.

The community in which I have made my home for the past 28 years, the (more recently) upscale and uber-liberal neighborhood of Park Slope, Brooklyn, is perhaps the North American epicenter of this emasculating cultural earthquake. As I walked to the kwoon recently to teach my regular Thursday evening class, I passed a little maternity shop on Seventh Avenue. In its window I beheld, with a shudder of existential revulsion, a life-sized cutout of the New Man (if “man” is any longer an apt term for this bridled, caponized, and domesticated deputy female).

Here he is.

Read More »

Arizona: Phoenix, or Tombstone?

I’ve been mum about politics for a few weeks, and in particular haven’t said anything about the controversial Arizona legislation, although as you might imagine I of course see no reason why Arizona shouldn’t act if the federal government simply won’t. Meanwhile, here in New York our own mayor — who, as both New York City’s chief executive and wealthiest resident, spends his time in environment-proof bubbles here and at his waterfront estate in Bermuda, thereby having as little direct exposure to the undesirable effects of mass illegal immigration as a Patagonian goatherd — has decried the legislation as a route to “national suicide”. (That’s an interesting choice of words, by the way, given that Lawrence Auster persuasively argued exactly the opposite in his influential 1990 tract The Path To National Suicide, which I doubt Hizzoner has ever read, though I wish he would.)

Mr. Bloomberg complained that “Somehow or other, after 9/11 we went from reaching out and trying to get the best and the brightest to come here, to trying to keep them out.” Apparently in his mind there was no discrimination to be made between: a) the total cessation of all immigration; b) a rational and rigorously enforced immigration policy that admits those whose presence here might actually benefit the US in some way, and c) the complete abandonment of any effort whatsoever to secure our frontiers. Does he really imagine that it is the “best and the brightest” who are streaming furtively across the Arizona border?

But perhaps that is the point: to discriminate between those options would necessitate that we also discriminate as regards the desirability of applicants for US residence — and discrimination of any sort, even in the essential interest of cultural and national self-preservation, is anathema to the liberal mind.

But enough; if I warm to the topic any more I’ll be ranting again for months. Anyway, so much has been written by now about this that I have nothing new to add, even were I so inclined — so I’ll just offer links to some of the sharper items I’ve read over the past few days.

Here are three: by Victor Davis Hanson, Michelle Malkin, and Mark Steyn.

Hard Rain Gonna Fall

Here, with a hat tip to my friend Eugene Dushkin, is a breezy item about investment strategies for the forthcoming collapse of civilization.

S.F.

Time for more Shameless Filler.

First: reader JK sends us this sample of high culture, American Style. (Try not to be too depressed by the remark right at the very end.)

Second: an annoyingly persuasive optical illusion.

Third: why we seriously need to rethink Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

Finally, I hear you grumble: why does it have to be Shameless Filler Night again?

Well, you thankless whelps, it’s because in order to earn a crust, your devoted host must spend the near-totality of his waking hours planted, as sessile as a barnacle, at a Formica desk in a five-foot-wide cubicle in a fluorescently lit office on the eighth floor of a tall black building in a huge city, typing inscrutable expressions from a curious symbolic language onto a glowing screen. In a bygone era he might have been a frontiersman, taming a brawny continent with naught but steel and sinew, but this is what Men have become. Which is what makes our final item so very sad.

Loopy

Hofstadter’s Law:

“It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter’s Law.”

Master Class

When I was a young man I played the drums, and was pretty sure that one day I would be a Great Big Rock Star. To advance this project, I went looking for a job at a New York City recording studio, on the theory that I’d then be right in the thick of things, allowing my incandescent career to develop along a natural course.

In 1978, I got the job. Indeed, I didn’t just get a job, I got a job at The Power Station (now Avatar), the hottest place in town. That was about it for playing the drums, though, because a) I had moved to a tiny studio apartment, with nowhere to keep drums or play them; b) I was working long and random hours at my new job, and had no time for a band; c) the best drummers in the world were trooping through the place every day, and it soon became cruelly apparent that I was not even close to being in their league; and d) I was learning the art of record-making from some of the industry’s foremost producers and engineers, realized that I had a knack for it myself, and saw that this was clearly where I should be concentrating my efforts.

Read More »

Stuff Guys Do

I’m old enough to remember the Apollo 11 mission, the one that put men on the moon for the first time ever. It was a pretty big deal. (We won’t be doing that again anytime soon, thanks to You-Know-Who.)

Now, with a hat-tip to my boy Nick, here’s the fateful launch as you’ve never seen it before.

Winner’s Circle

In every generation, some of us have children. Others, for various reasons, don’t. (Historically, most women do, and most men don’t.)

In good times, it is relatively easy to bring offspring to adulthood, and populations swell. In hard times it can be very difficult indeed, and only a few manage. When times are bad enough, lineages fail, and entire species become extinct. This fate has befallen, to within a rounding-off error, every species that has ever existed. It almost happened to us too; the entire h. sapiens population is thought to have dwindled to only a few thousand individuals as recently as 75,000 years ago.

What this means, then, is that each of us — every living creature — stands at the end of an unbroken sequence of incalculably lucky winners. This winning streak extends back through all the centuries of recorded history, through hundreds of thousands of years of unremembered human experience, through millions of years of hominid ancestry, through the earliest, shrew-like primates, through synapsid reptiles — back, back through pre-reptilian amphibians, through lobe-finned fish, back through the earliest chordates, half a billion years ago — and on and on, in a continuous chain of life spanning more than three billion years. And at any time throughout those uncountable eons, that infinitely fragile linkage leading to you, or me, or the squirrel in my back yard, or a fly buzzing in a swamp in Cameroon, could have been broken — by a predator’s snap, a falling branch, a cold spell, a hot spell, a drought, a flood, a fire, a virus, hunger, thirst, a successful rival, a dagger, a bullet, or any other of the illimitably many ways there are, in a violent and uncaring world, to die childless. It would have been the easiest thing, indeed the likeliest thing, for that absurdly, impossibly extended thread to have been severed.

But it wasn’t. And here we are.

Think of that!

Close Up Those Barren Leaves

More from Eric Hoffer:

According to Bergson “the intellect is characterized by an inability to comprehend life.” Kant was certain that “the origin of the cosmos will be explained sooner than the mechanism of a plant or caterpillar.” How outlandish then is the belief that the intellect can fathom men’s soul.

How can science unravel the chemistry of the soul when what we have here is actually an alchemy? Good and evil, beauty and ugliness, truth and error, love and hatred, the sublime and the ridiculous continually pass into each other. And alchemy is ruled not by the intellect but by magic.

Before the Sabbath, p. 79

Magic? Really? Well, let’s see how it goes; we’re only just getting warmed up. And we’ve already made surprisingly good progress with those caterpillars.

Speed And Power

Reader JK calls our attention (we’re taking a time-out in Wellfleet this weekend, and not reading the news) to an article in the Times about a new weapons system in the DOD pipeline:

Called Prompt Global Strike, the new weapon is designed to carry out tasks like picking off Osama bin Laden in a cave, if the right one could be found; taking out a North Korean missile while it is being rolled to the launch pad; or destroying an Iranian nuclear site ”” all without crossing the nuclear threshold. In theory, the weapon will hurl a conventional warhead of enormous weight at high speed and with pinpoint accuracy, generating the localized destructive power of a nuclear warhead.

I generally try to be au courant regarding matters military — but obviously I’ve been slacking off, as this is the first I’ve heard about this project. Read the article here.

What Do Women Want?

Our friend Dennis Mangan is a rising star in the conservative blogosphere, and in addition to his continuing work at Mangan’s he has begun contributing articles to the new conservative website Alternative Right. His latest is about the biological causes of the male-female “wage gap”. Read it here.

Leveling

Here’s Eric Hoffer again, writing in 1974:

The agitation about the population explosion is persuading many talented and enterprising Americans to have few children. The resulting change in the composition of the population will probably be not unlike that produced by war, which kills the strong and venturesome and increases the proportion of those least fit to improve and adorn mankind.

We see at present brilliant people agitate with all their might against the birth and advancement of brilliant Americans. They want to divert all wealth and energies toward the nurturing of the least endowed.

Before the Sabbath, p. 25

Why Science Is Cool

Here.

Europe: Doomed.

Unbelievable.

Hat tip to Lawrence Auster.