Let’s Be Clear

There was an article in yesterday’s Times about friction between European Muslims and their host culture. In it we find the following:

Youcef Mammeri, a writer on Islam in France and member of the Joint Council of Muslims of Marseille, says that the debates over minarets, burqas and national identity have angered many French-born Muslims and brought them together in a defensive circle.

Asked about the source of “this anxiety about Islam,’ Mr. Mammeri said: “I ask myself this same question.’ He finds “a perverse aspect to all these questions asked Muslims, which are not coherent,’ he said, but “liberate and dignify existing racism’ and “stigmatize Muslims.’

Racism in France has moved from being anti-Arab to anti-Muslim, he said, “a terrible regression.’

And a terrible confusion — perpetuated, unsurprisingly, by the Times. Opposition to the Islamization of Europe has little to do with race; it is more akin to opposition to, say, Maoism. Both are systems of ideas, and both are expansionist, totalizing ideologies. What is at issue is not Europe’s relationship with this or that Muslim, or group of Muslims, but rather with Islam itself, a highly stable and well-replicating meme-plex of which any person, of any race whatsoever, can be a carrier. It is the increasingly conspicuous implantation of this alien complex of ideas and customs — one that is fundamentally at odds with the cultural and philosophical foundations of Western civilization — on their home soil that Europeans are alarmed about. What it is not is racism.

Geeks Bearing Gifts

I’ve been slacking off over the holidays. I’ve hardly even read the news, and I’ve had nothing to say even about the Mutallab incident (others have said it all by now, anyway; in particular, Janet Napolitano’s idiotic comment that “the system worked” has been ridiculed amply and deservedly).

As usual, my family gave me books for Christmas — I’m otherwise hard to shop for, as I already have all the material things I need, and everybody knows that books are always welcome.

But I did get one new toy: an Amazon Kindle.

Read More »

Merry Christmas

To you all.

Sam Clemens Goes To Hell

The Senate today passed its version of the health-care bill. It is by no account a pretty thing — among the latest complaints about it is the payoff given to Ben Nelson in exchange for his vote, whereby the rest of the Union must absorb, in perpetuity, any costs Nebraska may incur whilst expanding Medicaid — but there it is. The full text of the Senate bill is here (with manager’s amendment here), and in a Christmas-y spirit of amiable bipartisan brotherliness I plan to give it a detailed and sympathetic reading over the holidays, on the off chance that my shriveled, conservative, Grinch’s heart may grow a size or two, allowing me thereby to see that this legislation is in fact the gateway to a broad, sunlit upland of carefree and salubrious prosperity for all, and not the grotesque and fiscally irresponsible pork-laden, bureaucracy-bloating, dependency-culture-expanding, dearly bought boondoggle it appears to be.

The Senate bill must, of course, still be reconciled in conference with the House version, which you can read here. The Times has also put together a helpful point-by-point comparison of the two packages here.

Read More »

Vigil

I’ve been working late again, and have had no time this evening for writing. But I do want to take the time to mention to you all that our friend, the blogger Kevin Kim, is here in New York tonight at the hospital bedside of his mother, who is gravely ill with brain cancer. She had come here from the family home in Virginia for consultation and possible surgery, but instead has rapidly declined. I ask you all to turn your thoughts (and, on the off-chance that there are any believers amongst our readership, your prayers) his way; support in any form will surely be appreciated.

Blogger that he is, Kevin has chronicled his mother’s illness since the spring; you can read and offer your own thoughts here.

I know how awful this time is for Kevin and his family; my own mother succumbed to cancer in March of 2006.

Be strong, Kevin. We’re all thinking of you.

Over The ‘Precipice’

This from the WSJ this morning, on the shameful health-care machinations currently underway in Congress:

Change Nobody Believes In
A bill so reckless that it has to be rammed through on a partisan vote on Christmas eve.

And tidings of comfort and joy from Harry Reid too. The Senate Majority Leader has decided that the last few days before Christmas are the opportune moment for a narrow majority of Democrats to stuff ObamaCare through the Senate to meet an arbitrary White House deadline. Barring some extraordinary reversal, it now seems as if they have the 60 votes they need to jump off this cliff, with one-seventh of the economy in tow.

Mr. Obama promised a new era of transparent good government, yet on Saturday morning Mr. Reid threw out the 2,100-page bill that the world’s greatest deliberative body spent just 17 days debating and replaced it with a new “manager’s amendment” that was stapled together in covert partisan negotiations. Democrats are barely even bothering to pretend to care what’s in it, not that any Senator had the chance to digest it in the 38 hours before the first cloture vote at 1 a.m. this morning. After procedural motions that allow for no amendments, the final vote could come at 9 p.m. on December 24.

Even in World War I there was a Christmas truce.

The rushed, secretive way that a bill this destructive and unpopular is being forced on the country shows that “reform” has devolved into the raw exercise of political power for the single purpose of permanently expanding the American entitlement state. An increasing roll of leaders in health care and business are looking on aghast at a bill that is so large and convoluted that no one can truly understand it, as Finance Chairman Max Baucus admitted on the floor last week. The only goal is to ram it into law while the political window is still open, and clean up the mess later.

As Mark Twain said: “No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe when Congress is in session.” A majority of Americans — as well as all the doctors whose opinion I have managed to gather — now oppose this dog’s-breakfast of a bill. At this point we can only hope that it bleeds to death in conference.

Read the rest of the editorial here.

Haven’t We Covered This Already?

It’s been pretty thin gruel over here the past few days — the holidays being what they are, I’ve had scant opportunity for solitary labor. So for tonight I’ll send you along to Mangan’s, where our doughty heathen Dennis confronts once again (as we have also done at length in these pages, at various intervals) the inextinguishable falsehood, so popular amongst conservative theists, that religion is necessary for morality. Here.

Ho Ho Ho!

The snowflakes are aswirl here in Gotham today, and, lighthearted soul that I am, I’m so caught up in the gay holiday mood that spending hours at the keyboard grinding out a lengthy post seems entirely out of the question. So for tonight, in the joyous spirit of Christmas, here’s a little item about how we have learned to induce male bedbugs to stab each other to death with their penises. (Original paper here).

Good, And Good For You

Are you a vegetarian? Well, I’m not. Indeed, I so enjoy being a carnivore that it has occurred to me on occasion to bump up to the next level, and eat only animals that are themselves carnivores — which I’ve always imagined would be the nutritional equivalent of smoking “roach weed”.

Anyway, the next time a spindly neurasthenic vegan ectomorph gets in your face with the usual rubbish about how Nature never intended us to eat meat, you can tell him to have a look at this.

Getting Warmer

Writing in today’s Times, Tom Friedman shows encouraging signs of coming around to a more realistic position on Islam and jihad, though he still stops well short of grasping the nettle.

Read More »

Conflict Of Interest

It is no easy thing for an American president to wage an unpopular war. To make war effectively requires both secrecy and resolve, and neither can be relied upon under the American system. The transparency of government and freedom of the press that stand as bulwarks against tyranny and corruption make secrecy difficult and undependable — and given that any politician’s tenure is subject to abrupt termination at the whim of an electorate that, confident in America’s natural defenses of salt water and weak neighbors, slips naturally into pacifistic isolationism, resolve fades quickly as expenses mount.

Read More »

Cui Bono?

More muckraking from James Delingpole. Here.

Stupid Cephalopod Tricks

Making the rounds today is some marvelously entertaining footage that some biologists think is evidence of tool use amongst invertebrates. I think it’s safe to say you’ve never seen this before; see for yourself here.

It’s Back

It is Spring in Saturn’s northern hemisphere, and the gas giant’s north pole, which has been hidden in shadow for years, is visible again. NASA’s Cassini orbiter has now sent along some dramatic new images of the strange hexagon that girdles the planet’s upper latitudes — a curious meteorological feature that seems to be as persistent as Jupiter’s Great Red Spot.

Learn more here.

Words Matter

The lovely Nina and I were in Philadelphia this weekend, visiting some old friends, and today we took in the Arshile Gorky show at the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Gorky was one of the most influential artists of the 20th century, and the show made quite an impression on us (fittingly, I suppose, given that Gorky was a founder of Abstract Impressionism). I was also impressed by an important detail in the curator’s notes.

“Arshile Gorky” was not the artist’s real name: he was born Vostanik Manoog Adoyan in Armenia in about 1902. He had a brief life, and a hard one. Suffering from colon cancer in Connecticut in 1948, abandoned by his wife and children, having lost much of his life’s work in a fire the year before, and having lost, also, the use of his painting arm as a result of a car accident, he hanged himself.

But the central tragedy of the young artist’s life took place in 1915, when he and his mother and sister were swept up in the brutal pogrom against ethnic Armenians in Turkey, and driven on the forced death march to Yerevan. His beloved mother died of starvation in his arms.

I was gratified to note that in the audio tour and other notes, the presenters referred to this horror frankly, and without resort to timorous euphemism, as the Armenian “Genocide”. It was nothing less, modern-day revisionism by the Turks notwithstanding.

My Man Dan

I owe a substantial debt of thanks to my friend Dan Betz for his help in redesigning the look of this website over the past week or so. Dan, who is a younger “training brother” of mine down at the kwoon (and a formidable Hung Ga expert, and instructor, in his own right), is also a professional web-designer. When he saw me floundering around with a new theme last week he kindly offered to make some changes to improve layout and readability, and I gladly accepted. Before I knew it he had concocted an entirely new, elegant WordPress theme for me, and he has now put it into service.

Dan’s improvements were based in part on the work of the people at the Readability Project, which is dedicated to making the Web a friendlier place for those of us whose primary use of the Web is not to surf and click and look at pictures, but to read. They offer readers a handy bookmarklet that you can use to convert any Web page into a far more readable format. It’s available at their website, here.

A respectful bow to you, Dan. I am enormously grateful.

Waq al-Waq

A new link on the sidebar today: a blog that focuses on Islam and insurgency in Yemen, where lately the game, as Holmes used to say, has been afoot.

(And yes, I rather liked the name.)

Wow, What A Crisis! It Slices, It Dices…

Writing in today’s Washington Post, Charles Krauthammer blows the whistle on an end run by the Executive Branch intended to bring a huge swath of US private-sector activity under the direct control of the EPA, in yet another example of fantastic utility of the Global Warming “crisis” as a justification for statist and socialist power-grabs on the most audacious scale.

Krauthammer explains why Global Warmism has become the Swiss Army Knife of the activist Left:

Politically it’s an idea of genius, engaging at once every left-wing erogenous zone: rich man’s guilt, post-colonial guilt, environmental guilt. But the idea of shaking down the industrial democracies in the name of the environment thrives not just in the refined internationalist precincts of Copenhagen. It thrives on the national scale, too.

Read the article here.

Please Forgive Our Appearance

If you drop by here over the next few days and things look completely out of whack, it’s because we are making some adjustments to the site’s WordPress “theme”. As they say on the highway signs, “Temporary Inconvenience — Permanent Improvement.” (As if THAT were true.)

Anyway, thanks for your patience.

Cold Hard Facts

As I mentioned in a previous post, there are three central assertions being made by global-warming activists, each of which is contentious in its own right. The first — let’s call it W — is that the Earth is currently warming. The second — we’ll call this one A — is that W is caused primarily by anthropogenic influences, the corollary of which assumption is that by reducing or eliminating those influences, we can prevent significant warming. The third — call it R — is that W and A, taken together, justify a global political and economic response, an engineered reorganization of human affairs on a staggering and utterly unprecedented scope.

It is important to keep in mind that while W and A are empirical claims, having to to with facts about the actual world, R is a normative assertion; it is about what we ought to do. The “Climategate” kerfuffle that has provided such lively entertainment in recent weeks is about W, and to a lesser extent A, while R is irreducibly a matter of opinion — though of course one that depends very sensitively upon W and A. With me so far?

Read More »

More Aquavit, Vicar?

In case you didn’t see this on the news: there were some very strange doings high in the sky over Norway this morning (take a peek below the fold). Story here.
Read More »

Follow The Green

I’ve played the Devil’s advocate for a while now on the topic of Global Warmism, but I want to take a moment to remind readers that my attitude toward its central claims — namely a) that the Earth is warming; b) that the primary cause is an anthropogenic increase in CO2, and c) that the effect of such warming will be so awful that we should take immediate and drastic measures at a global level, with enormous impact upon both the world economy and the sovereignty of powerful nations — is generally agnostic (regarding at least the first, and perhaps also the second). My responses in these pages, rather, generally reflect an inveterate wariness toward grandiose collectivist schemes, particularly when they assume the form of secular religions, complete with sanctimonious moralizing toward infidels and heretics — all of which the Global Warmist movement exhibits in spades.

Students of history need no reminding that progressivist ideologues like nothing better than a crisis, or an external enemy; they are just the thing for suspending those pesky individual economic and social liberties, and they provide an unbeatable rationale for collective action at the broadest possible scale. In times past the broadest possible scale was that of a nation, or an empire — but Global Warming, affecting, as it is alleged to do, the entire Planet, expands “broadest possible scale” to its literal maximum.

Read More »

Liminality

It is a common view that consciousness has something to to with the degree of integration of different areas of the brain. The idea is not only a modern scientific notion: it is also a tenet of various esoteric schools (for example that of G.I. Gurdjieff; see here and here) that higher degrees of consciousness are the result of directed effort to integrate the assorted “parts” of the mind/body system, and that diminished consciousness, and sleep, result from their disconnection.

Read More »

More Navel-Gazing

We’ll get back to normal operations tomorrow, I expect, but for today I’ve still been twiddling around with this new layout. (Reactions have been mixed, and I’m still making up my mind about it.) It’s taking me a little while to figure out how to customize the design — there are various PHP and CSS files to tinker around with — and I have no particular gift for graphic design in the first place. I realize this “theme” is rather austere, but I’ve always rather enjoyed the look of such sites (McSweeney’s is a good example), and I was getting awfully tired of the old one, which had begun to seem rather juvenile and hokey.

Our reader Charles warns us that the “Captcha” comment-spam blocker (where you have to type in some numbers to leave a comment) will wipe out what you’ve already written if you fail to enter the code correctly. I’ll see if there’s any way to fix that. Meanwhile I always recommend typing your comments on your local machine, then pasting them in — and of course if you register as a user here you don’t have to bother with the Captcha at all.

Charles also suggested that the page might be too wide for comfortable reading. I actually had widened it a bit, but I’ll set it back to the default.

Thanks to those of you who have written in; I am grateful for any and all suggestions or complaints.

Bear With Me

I’ve just upgraded my WordPress installation, and am fishing around for a new visual “theme” for this site. (I’ve gotten very tired of the old one.)

So the look of this place may vary for the next few days or weeks until I settle on something. Feel free to comment.

Beach Day!

We’re off duty today, and so the lovely Nina and I took a long walk this afternoon on the beach at Maguire’s Landing (a.k.a. Lecounts Hollow) here in Wellfleet.

It being December, we had the place all to ourselves. (Well, almost, as you’ll see below.) It was very beautiful. I took a few pictures, shortly before sunset.

Read More »

Full Circle At Mangan’s

Well, the saga continues at Mangan’s. His old blog having risen from its ashes, Dennis has decided to carry on there, while taking precautions to ensure continuity if he is cold-cocked by Google again.

So: http://mangans.blogspot.com it is.

Can’t Keep A Good Man Down

I’ll be traveling today, with scant time to write, but I wanted to let all of you know that Dennis Mangan is back in business:

http://mangans.typepad.com/mangans/

Adjust your links accordingly.

Half A League Onward

I watched the President’s speech last night. It was not encouraging. It had something for everyone: escalation for the hawks; an exit date for the doves; the usual rot about “distorting and defiling a great religion”, to keep the Muslims off the streets; some bean-counting for the frugal; some American exceptionalism for the true believers; some mulitilateralism for the rest; a little torture-and-Gitmo-loathing for the base; and to wrap up, some right-makes-might for moral uplift.

The problem is that the situation is impossible; there simply are no good options. Never have I felt more pessimistic.

Read More »

Mulligan?

Now here’s something you rarely see: a prominent and powerful male, exposed publicly to have been a duplicitous, goat-footed philanderer — and having thereby humiliated, before a drooling global audience, his dutiful wife and mortified family — makes a sheepish statement (note the shift in declension, from caprine to ovine) in which he reassures us all that he “regrets” his transgressions.

This time it’s Tiger Woods.

Thoughtcrime

It appears that our friend Dennis Mangan has run afoul of Google’s guidelines for acceptable content: as of late afternoon yesterday his blog’s homepage has been replaced by the dreaded Blogger Screen of Death.

This happened also to Jeffery Hodges a while back, though in that case it appeared to be some sort of mistake: it was hard to see how anyone, even a Bay Area leftie, would have been offended by Jeffery’s amiable blog, and as it happened a friend of mine at Google was able to get his site restored. In Dennis’s case, however, I think this was probably a deliberate move on Google’s part. Mangan’s had been attracting a lot of attention lately (and, presumably, links and traffic), and Dennis writes frankly on matters of social and scientific controversy. In particular Dennis often discussed the dangerously radioactive subject of “human biodiversity”, a.k.a. “HBD”: the radical notion that there may indeed be systematic genetic differences of various sorts between human populations, that these variations are a suitable and important topic for scientific inquiry, and that there should be no taboos against such research, or against free discussion of what research already exists. (It is worth noting that an article on the subject was also removed, recently, from Wikipedia.)

In addition to his writings on HBD, Dennis also writes, from a conservative viewpoint, about other contentious topics: multiculturalism and the general decline of Western culture; immigration; religion and atheism — and, as a scientist himself, he often writes with caustic tone about the resistance of the scientific “establishment” to the presentation and discussion of heterodox ideas, particularly in the medical and climate sciences.

In other words: Dennis hasn’t got a P.C. bone in his body. He is always civil, always reasonable, and is motivated only by his sincere concern for ailing Western culture, and by a desire to get at the facts, however “inconvenient” they may be — but I have no doubt that as far as many people are concerned he is quite beyond the pale. His site had also become rather a rallying point for like-minded discontents, and I imagine he became conspicuous enough that someone at Google decided to declare him to be in violation of their terms of service.

I can tell you from personal experience that for a dedicated blogger, having one’s website go down is profoundly disconcerting; I don’t think it is an overstatement to say that it feels like a sudden existential amputation. My advice to any of you out there who have blogs on Blogspot: do yourself a favor and get your own site, especially if you have anything pungent or controversial to express. The cost is trivial — I pay $8 a month for hosting, and registering a domain is even cheaper — but most important of all, you own your content, and for now at least, you cannot be silenced. Blogspot is a free service, and as we have seen you run the risk of being taken down at Google’s merest whim, without even a word of warning.

I have no doubt that Dennis will be back; look for updates here.

It’s A Hell Of A Town

In the comment thread to our recent post about John Derbyshire’s book We Are Doomed, commenter JW asked one very good question: why, if increasing ethnic and cultural diversity lead to corresponding increases in tension and strife, does New York City (where I live) manage to function as well as it does?

Why indeed? To the visitor or casual observer it does seem that New York is the perfect poster-child for the ideology of Diversity: an extraordinary amalgam of people from every corner of the world, a confluence of colors and cultures on a scale unmatched anywhere on Earth. If critics of Diversity are right, it shouldn’t last another day. How can it possibly work?

Read More »

Marriage Of Convenience

A recent item in the Long War Journal informs us that it appears that al-Qaeda is consolidating a Waziristan-style presence in Eastern Syria. Nothing happens in Syria without the consent of the Ba’ath Party, and the story does indeed tell us that there appears to be a working partnership in place between al-Qaeda and former Iraqi Ba’athists.

This has to be an uneasy alliance, I should think. For starters, there has been considerable tension in the past between the Iraqi Ba’ath Party and the original Syrian branch, although I would expect that with the party banned in Iraq that particular hatchet is likely buried for the moment. But there are very deep ideological rifts between the Ba’athists, who are more or less secular pan-Arab Marxists, and al-Qaeda, who obviously have as their goal the restoration of an Islamist theocracy. (Indeed one of the Ba’ath Party’s founding intellectuals, Michel Aflaq, was a Christian who saw in a secular, trans-national Arabist movement a way to avoid minority status under Islam — and in principle the Ba’athists, by favoring a secular state, are in violation of one of Ibn Wahhab’s Ten Voiders of Islam, and are thereby apostates.) Complicating things further, the Syrian Ba’ath Party has been led for decades by Hafez al-Assad and his son Bashar, who are Alawi Shi’ites; al-Qaeda, of course, is a Sunni organization, has no love for the Shi’a, and has been responsible for many attacks on Shi’ites in Iraq and elsewhere. (To get a feel for the depth of this animosity, read Section 3, for example, of this 2004 letter from Osama bin Laden’s deputy Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to his chief.)

It is often pointed out that the Islamic world is far from monolithic, and that there are many orthogonal axes along which alliances (and fractures) can develop. These two players have common ground as Muslims, and as Arabs, and as enemies of the United States, and it seems that’s enough for now. I suppose they figure they can sort each other out once we’re out of the picture.

Story here.

Toast

I’ve just begun reading John Derbyshire’s dour and mordantly funny new book We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism. The first chapter deals with our bizarre and destructive obsession with Diversity — a liberal viewpoint, now thoroughly hegemonic at all levels of societal administration, that Mr. Derbyshire sums up as The Diversity Theorem:

Different populations, of different races, customs, religions, and preferences, can be mixed together in any numbers or proportions at all, with harmonious result. Not only will the result be harmonious, it will also be beneficial to all the people thus mixed. They will be better and happier than if they had been left to stagnate in dull homogeneity.

Read More »

Science!

There’s all sorts of interesting scientific news today, including several stories from recent Science Daily newsletters.

First up: there is further supporting evidence that the Toba volcano, which I have written about before, indeed caused far-flung devastation when it blew a gigantic hole in the island of Sumatra 73,000 years ago. The explosion is believed to have brought our species very close indeed to the edge of extinction. Learn more here.

Second: I’m sure most of you have never thought about just what most people mean when they use the word “most”. (I can assure you, at least, that I never have.) But Prof. Mira Ariel of Tel Aviv University’s Department of Linguistics has apparently been thinking about it very hard indeed, and it turns out that it means 80 to 95 percent. For now, at least. Story here.

Third, it appears that the Milky Way, the charming spiral galaxy we call home, is crashing another galaxy even as you read this. You probably hadn’t noticed, because the other galaxy, it turns out, is invisible. Here.

There’s much, much more — these are interesting times! — but that’s enough for now.

Things Are Heating Up

David Duff is having a nice gloat over the Climategate kerfuffle — which I must say is unfolding rather gratifyingly, for those of us who thought we already had enough religions in the world and didn’t see the need for any expensive new ones.

Here.

In Hot Water

While I was away this weekend, paying scant attention to the news, a serious brouhaha seems to have erupted in the global-warming community. Apparently a hacker got hold of, and made public, emails and internal documents from the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia — a major center for AGW study — and they appear to contain evidence of grave improprieties involving the rigging and politicization of research and publication. It will be interesting to see where this goes.

Blogger Dennis Mangan has already picked up the story (his post’s title may somewhat overstate the case, though again it may not); have a look here.

This Is Bad

You know you’ve been spending way too much time programming when you suddenly see the people making sandwiches at the deli counter as a thread pool, and the single slicer as a synchronization object.

Courting Trouble

I know I said I’d lay off this stuff, but what the heck. In today’s edition of the WSJ’s Best of the Web, James Taranto offers the following:

Read More »

Immune Responses

Our recent post on the need for cultures to have, like any organism, an effective “immune system” has led to an interesting discussion with our friend Kevin Kim. It continues here.

Chain Of Fools

A brain is only as strong as its weakest think.

Enough For Now

I’ve been writing an awful lot about the decline of the West lately, and in particular about how our crazy obsession with “diversity” affects our prospects in our ancient conflict with Islam; one might think that’s the only thing on my mind, which it certainly is not. I also think that I’ve begun to give some readers the impression that I am some sort of narrow-minded bigot, seething with genocidal hatred, which is very far indeed from the truth. Really, I’m just worried, that’s all, and I don’t want to see Western civilization and culture — which I unabashedly believe to be the highest achievement, to date, in humanity’s long struggle to raise itself above the apes and brutes from which we are all descended — fall in ruins. At least not on my watch.

I think I’ll try to lay off the subject a bit for a while; I’ve been neglectful of many of the topics we used to cover here often. (I also haven’t had a whole lot of time to write, lately, and may have none at all tomorrow, as I will be traveling.)

For tonight, then, something completely different; an interesting item on the technology front: road trains. Here.

Mohammed Comes To The Mountain

I’m working late again this week, and have had no time to write. But reader JK has sent along a link to an informed and thoughtful post about the Obama administration’s decision to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed in the criminal court here in New York City. Here is an excerpt:

Read More »

Diplomatic Immunity

The Fort Hood massacre has got people talking, and it even seems suddenly to have dawned on a lot of people — as a startlingly new idea — that perhaps there might even be appropriate limits to our liberal infatuation with multiculturalism and radical non-discrimination: that “diversity” might not only not be the summum bonum of an enlightened culture, but that carried too far it might in fact be cultural suicide.

Cultures are much more than mere philosophical abstractions: they are, in a sense, living organisms, and like any living organism they must be discriminating about what they ingest. Without such habits of caution, and in the absence of an immune system that can distinguish between “self” and “other” and so protect the system from pathogens and parasites, an organism will die — and a species that is so maladapted as to lack these essential capacities will go extinct.

Read More »

Gotterdammerung

As I write, the Wolverines are collapsing yet again, this time against Wisconsin. How I miss Lloyd Carr.

Apparently I am not the only one who is upset with Rich Rodriguez, as you can see below.

It Is Balloon!

I have to say: YouTube is amazing. Here’s something for you music lovers “of a certain age”: a clip from the old TV series F Troop, in which the folks at Fort Courage were visited by a musical act calling themselves The Bedbugs.

As it turns out, the leader and drummer of The Bedbugs are none other than the great Lowell George and Richie Hayward, respectively, whom the cognoscenti among you will of course know as founding members of Little Feat.

Have a look.

Oakeshott On Conservatism, Cont’d

Recently Bill Vallicella excerpted, and I commented briefly upon, some passages from philosopher Michael Oakeshott’s essay On Being Conservative. Wishing to refresh my memory of a few points, I opened it up again today — and was impressed once more by what a fine piece of writing it is, and by how well it limns the conservative disposition.

Read More »

Evelyn Hofer, 1922-2009

Tonight we note with sadness the death of photographer Evelyn Hofer, who although not nearly as well known as some of the prominent photographers of her day, was widely regarded as one of the greatest photographic artists of the 20th century.

I did not know Ms. Hofer well, though I met her on a couple of occasions, and she attended my wedding in 1982. She was, however, a very close friend of my mother-in-law Lily Renée Phillips (who is a gifted artist in her own right). Several of Evelyn Hofer’s beautiful photographs, including portraits of my wife’s family, adorn our home.

You can read her New York Times obituary here, and see more of her work here.

Comprehensible

President Obama gave a speech today at Fort Hood. You can read the transcript here.

In his remarks he referred to Nidal Hasan’s murderous rampage as “incomprehensible”. To him it may actually be, which is in itself a harrowing thought. For most of the rest of us, it is anything but.

Read More »

TANSTAAFL

Economist Thomas Sowell offers some sensible remarks about the health-care juggernaut now bludgeoning its way through Congress:

One of the strongest talking points of those who want a government-run medical care system is that we simply cannot afford the high and rising costs of medical care under the current system.

First of all, what we can afford has absolutely nothing to do with the cost of producing anything. We will either pay those costs or not get the benefits. Moreover, if we cannot afford the quantity and quality of medical care that we want now, the government has no miraculous way of enabling us to afford it in the future.

If you think the government can lower medical costs by eliminating “waste, fraud and abuse,” as some Washington politicians claim, the logical question is: Why haven’t they done that already?

Over the years, scandal after scandal has shown waste, fraud and abuse to be rampant in Medicare and Medicaid. Why would anyone imagine that a new government medical program will do what existing government medical programs have clearly failed to do?

If we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals and pharmaceutical drugs now, how can we afford to pay for doctors, hospitals and pharmaceutical drugs, in addition to a new federal bureaucracy to administer a government-run medical system?

Nothing is easier for politicians than to rail against the profits of pharmaceutical companies, the pay of doctors and other things that have very little to do with the total cost of medical care, but which can arouse emotions to the point where facts don’t matter. As former Congressman Dick Armey put it, “Demagoguery beats data” in politics.

Economics and politics confront the same fundamental problem: What everyone wants adds up to more than there is. Market economies deal with this problem by confronting individuals with the costs of producing what they want, and letting those individuals make their own trade-offs when presented with prices that convey those costs. That leads to self-rationing, in the light of each individual’s own circumstances and preferences.

Politics deals with the same problem by making promises that cannot be kept, or which can be kept only by creating other problems that cannot be acknowledged when the promises are made.

Read the rest here.