Izzat so?

Here’s a response, by Stephen Moore and Arthur Laffer [cue ad-hominem attack in comment thread in 3…2…1…], to Hillary Clinton’s insulting remarks the other day about winning the “dynamic” states, and losing the backward ones.

I will confess that I hesitated before mentioning That Woman’s name in print. As Richard Wagner is said to have advised: “Never look at the trombones, it only encourages them.”

2 Comments

  1. JK says

    “Dynamic states”? Hardly.

    Recall the maps?

    http://malcolmpollack.com/2016/12/20/figure-and-ground-2/

    As stated below, no occasion to do a Google Search: Yet.

    (Though “I think maybe” I may have got one over on SoD [D&N] whether he recognized it as such, I doubt it’ll be acknowledged.)

    The D&N post? Oh yeah right …

    http://duffandnonsense.typepad.com/duff_nonsense/2018/03/vintage-dn-17-nov-06.html

    That’s the thing about Basking in the Narrative when one’s “Dear ol’ Dad’s” IT go-to-guy – can’t see the forest for the trees … and so it is for archipelagos which, incidentally, don’t show up on Google either.

    (I’m reckoning as a hypothesis I’m going with Google thinking anybody eligible for Social Security to be afflicted with Alzheimer’s or somesuch. But oh sometimes I wish; such was the case.)

    Posted March 26, 2018 at 7:14 pm | Permalink
  2. Whitewall says

    If you have lived in the American South, Her comments are familiar and very old. Like the article said, in many Red states…Mine-North Carolina-people see lots of new licence plates from Blue states. I hope these new comers remember what happened to their home states that made them move out.

    Posted March 26, 2018 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*