And What A Scene It Is

Some “random thoughts on the passing scene” from Thomas Sowell:

Not since the days of slavery have there been so many people who feel entitled to what other people have produced as there are in the modern welfare state, whether in Western Europe or on this side of the Atlantic.

Yes, so much so that it doesn’t even seem audacious or remarkable any more. Eric Hoffer marked this as well:

The change that matters is the change of a society’s axioms. The 1960s saw a slaughter of axioms. It would be interesting to identify the new axioms. I can think of a couple: (1) The object of life is fun. (2) The world owes everyone a living.

Sowell again:

How are children supposed to learn to act like adults, when so much of what they see on television shows adults acting like children?

How, indeed? I call what he’s referring to “cultural neoteny“.

Sowell:

Whenever you hear people talking about “a living Constitution,” almost invariably they are people who are in the process of slowly killing it by “interpreting” its restrictions on government out of existence.

Not much I can add to that. The Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause have holed our Republic below the waterline.

One more:

I have never known a word to become absolute dogma, without a speck of evidence, the way “diversity” has.

Quite so. God help us all.

Comic Relief

Mitt Romney and Barack Obama did a little standup comedy at the Alfred E. Smith Dinner tonight. Have a look.

I’ve seen the President cracking wise before, but never Mr. Romney. I have to say, he was downright Carsonesque.

Jay Mark Johnson

Amazing slit-camera photography. See here and here.

Be Very Afraid

I haven’t posted anything about martial arts in quite a while, so I thought I’d share this clip of some truly remarkable practitioners.

Hat tip: Matt Blazon.

Romney, Syria

I wouldn’t want anyone reading the previous post to think I’m particularly stoked about Mitt Romney; he’s a total squish on many issues of importance to conservatives, and just another democracy-exporting dreamer when it comes to foreign affairs.

Speaking of which: in this weeks Radio Derb, John Derbyshire zeroed in on the same comment from Mr. Romney’s VMI speech that I had singled out earlier:

In Syria I’ll work with our partners to identify and organize those members of the opposition who share our values and then ensure they obtain the arms they need to defeat Assad’s tanks helicopters and fighter jets.

Here’s Derb:

Quote from the Governor, quote: “In Syria I’ll work with our partners to identify and organize those members of the opposition who share our values and then ensure they obtain the arms they need to defeat Assad’s tanks, helicopters, and fighter jets ”¦ It’s essential that we develop influence with those forces in Syria that will one day lead a country that sits at the heart of the Middle East.” End quote.

In other words, Syria is Libya Two. Isn’t that what Romney’s saying? “Work with our partners ”¦” I guess that means NATO ”” you know, that military alliance set up to prevent Soviet forces from surging through the Fulda Gap into West Germany. So we and NATO are going to do what? “Organize those members of the opposition who share our values.”

Let’s see: Who have we got in the Syrian opposition? Some middle-aged clerks and schoolteachers who kinda like the idea of representative government, separation of powers, free press, et cetera, and who would like nothing better than to sit around in dusty rooms talking about those things all day long. Well, nothing except perhaps a U.S. refugee visa ”¦ None of these people could tell you how to strip a light machine-gun, but never mind: They share our values!

Who else have we got in the Syrian opposition? Tens of thousands of cold-eyed young fanatics, armed to the teeth by Iran, led by fighters hardened in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, ready to die for their faith, or to keep fighting for twenty years if necessary. Do they share our values? No, they spit on our values.

So tell me again, Governor, who are we going to help here? Who are we going to arm?

Who, indeed?

Meanwhile, somebody‘s been arming some of the Syrian rebels with MANPADS — portable surface-to-air missiles. This means that Syrian planes have to attack ground positions from higher altitudes, which in turn means less-effective air assaults with higher collateral damage. (Among other things, the latter makes the world humanitarian crisis that much more unbearable.)

I suspect the stuff is from Libya. After all, who benefits? If the international interest (shared by, among others, Turkey, Iran, and the U.S.) is converging on a truce, on getting Assad out without the pain of de-Baathification — in other words maintaining an Alawite regime, or at least strong Alawite influence in a new coalition — that seems to me at odds with the interests of the sort of folks who would be at the other end of a supply line in Libya. I’ll presume also that Egypt would have some role too, because the factions in Libya who would be involved in this are also well-represented there. It seems to me that the question of regional stability around Syria means a lot less to the Islamists in the Maghreb than it does to, say, Turkey (who will face a terrible refugee problem in the event of an all-out civil war in Syria) or Iran (who wants to maintain its influence in Syria, and a Mediterranean corridor, by way of its Alawite allegiances).

All this this is idle speculation on my part, of course. There are so many competing and overlapping interests at play in this conflict that it would be very difficult for someone like me to keep on top of it all, even if I spent all my time doing nothing else. Just following all the open-source material would be a more-than-full-time job.

Galluping To The Finish

Mitt Romney’s “steady erosion in the polls” continues: as of this afternoon’s Gallup survey, Romney now leads fifty-two percent to forty-five percent among likely voters.

Not that I put a lot of stock in polls, mind you — after all, only about nine percent of the people pollsters call actually respond. Nice to see this anyway, though.

Not Politics!

From Edge.org, here’s a fascinating article about human athleticism, and how it compares to that of other mammals.

Whack-A-Mole

Tim Carney brings the mallet down on a load of tendentious hogwash from Politico. Here.

Let’s Get Ready To Rumble!

Here we go again, folks. Tonight’s debate is now considered to be a must-win for the incumbent, thanks to what one of our commenters referred to not long ago as Mr. Romney’s “steady erosion in the polls”.

So what’s tonight’s drinking game? Well, this time, readers, you get to take your pick.

Sadly, I won’t be joining you; I’ll likely be somewhere on Route 95 as the bout gets underway, listening on the radio (a poor substitute for watching on TV while following along on Twitter, but it can’t be helped).

Bottoms up! And may the worst man lose.

1000 Words

Possible debate strategy for Mr. Romney tonight: just stand there holding this chart.

Génération Identitaire

Here. Hat tips to Bill Keezer and GoV.

This And That

I must apologize for the thin content here over the past few days — from time to time the demands and obligations of personal life leave me no time for blogging. (I realize that for waka waka waka to go dark for a day or two deprives no one of oxygen, but a lot of people do pass though here each day looking for something new, and I hate to disappoint them.) So distracted have I been this past week that I’m rather badly out of touch with just about everything. My inbox is filled with personal correspondence, notes from readers, and digests of the latest scientific, political, and strategic-security news, and it will be several days yet before I can wade through it all.

Here’s a link, at least: reader Bill Keezer directs our attention to Victor Davis Hanson’s latest look at the Obama campaign. It would be naive to imagine that it will sway anyone’s vote at this point, but even if it serves only to encourage the Right and to vex the Left, that’s still a job well done, I think.

Here’s another: a new look for some old utensils.

And this: riots in the wake of an Obama victory? See here and here.

Kevin Kim comments on Sam Harris’s latest.

Muslims assemble at Google’s London offices to demand compliance with Islamic blasphemy laws. Money quote:

One of the speakers, Sheikh Faiz Al-Aqtab Siddiqui, told The Daily Telegraph: “Terrorism is not just people who kill human bodies, but who kill human feelings as well. The makers of this film have terrorised 1.6 billion people.

Riiight.

Blue-state blues.

Finally: aircraft carriers in space.

Narcissist-In-Chief

For weeks now the Obama campaign has been offering a chance at dinner with The One to those who chip in a few bucks. (We commented here on one such solicitation.)

That dinner has now taken place, it appears. I know this because Mr. Obama just tweeted a picture with the heading:

Table for four: Kimberly, Mario, Joe, and Barack, at dinner in D.C. tonight.

“Okay,” I say to myself, “let’s have a look at the lucky, lucky winners.”

Here’s the picture:

Read More »

It Ain’t Necessarily So

Some house-guests arrived sometime after midnight Thursday night  —  the night of the bizarre VP debate  —  and of course before anyone could go to bed we had to spend an hour or so arguing about politics. (They’re liberal sorts.)

Healthcare came up. So did the alleged “fact” that the healthcare system of the  U.S.A. is ranked 37th in the world.

You hear this often. It’s based on a notorious report by the World Health Organization, and it’s utter rubbish. Fully two-thirds of the score used in the rankings has nothing to do with actual health, but with how each nation rates on purely ideological metrics, such as whether the system is funded according to a sufficiently progressive policy of income redistribution. The rest is made up of manipulative jiggery-pokery. For example, the U.S.A. is ranked a lowly 19th in life expectancy. Take away death from fatal injuries, however, and we’re number 1. (How my driving my car off a cliff, or being shot, is any reflection on our healthcare system is not explained.) Our low ranking in infant mortality turns out to be due to the fact that we actually try to save a great many babies that would simply be recorded as “stillborn” elsewhere. If they persist for a few days and die, into the infant mortality stats they go. And so on.

Writing at Commentary, Scott W. Atlas, a fellow at the Hoover Institution and professor of radiology and chief of neuroradiology at the Stanford University Medical Center, explains just how bad this oft-cited “study” really is.

In Cold Blood

From Danger Room, here’s a damning summary of the runup to the assault in Libya (thanks to Lokilinkster for the link).

An excerpt (emphasis added):

The security situation in Benghazi was “a struggle and remained a struggle throughout my time there,’ (.pdf) said Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, the State Department’s Site Security Team commander in Libya from February to August 2012. Wood, who is to testify to the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, added that “targeted attacks against westerners were on the increase.’

By July, the three diplomatic security teams on the ground in Libya were whittled down to one team “restricted from performing security work and limited to only training local guard force members,’ according to Wood. That team was eventually withdrawn too. [State Department security officer Eric]Nordstrom asked for an extension of the SST teams, but said he was turned down because there “would be too much political cost.’

“There was a complete and total lack of planning for what was going to happen next,’ he added. “There was no plan, there was just hope that everything would get better.’

As Danger Room first reported, security was then largely left in the hands of British security firm Blue Mountain, which employed unarmed Libyan guards and paid them $4 per hour.

Our enlightened Mideast policy: hope for change, but mind the “political cost”. Our ambassador and three others murdered on American soil in an act of war  —  and our President, who had ample warning of their peril but chose to do nothing about it, swans off to Vegas and the Letterman show, meanwhile deploying his sock-puppets to lie to the American press about what he knew and when. Just a “bump in the road”, after all, and there’s an election to win.

Are you angry yet, readers?

You’ve Got Mail!

OK, enough grim reality. Let’s all lighten up and take a break. Here, for example.

The Truth, For Once

You’ve probably heard people mentioning Lara Logan’s blunt talk about Afghanistan last week, but you should take twenty minutes and actually watch it. It’s here.

If you are informed enough, and wise enough, not to be taken in by the steady diet of lies and self-serving propaganda this administration feeds us about our Mideast adventures (the latest being the transparent fairy tale we were told about Benghazi), you’ll find it refreshing to see a mainstream journalist like Ms. Logan (who was stripped naked and sexually assaulted in Tahrir Square by the “Facebook revolutionaries” our useful idiots were cheering for at home) pushing back.

 

Bump In The Road

From the Heritage Foundation, here’s a sharp video on the Obama administration’s deceitful, ass-covering response to the Benghazi attack.

But hey, look  —  Big Bird!

Time Out

I haven’t said much about politics for the past few days; that’s because I haven’t had much to say. It’s been delightful to watch the discomfiture of  Mr. Obama’s media catchfarts as they’ve watched the momentum shifting sharply in Mr. Romney’s direction, though.

A couple of things worth mentioning:

First, Mr. Romney’s foreign-policy speech certainly did little to make me excited about the man. He clearly harbors the same hopeful delusions about the Middle East that most American politicians seem to, whether on the Left or the Right. An excerpt:

In Syria I’ll work with our partners to identify and organize those members of the opposition who share our values and then ensure they obtain the arms they need to defeat Assad’s tanks helicopters and fighter jets.

Yeah, that’s bound to go well.

Second, I hope you’ve all noticed Ms. Clinton’s efforts to distance her State Department from the Obama administration’s lies about the nature of the Benghazi attack. Obviously the chummy façade those two have presented since the inauguration is starting to crack; perhaps Ms. Clinton is beginning to see this campaign taking on water, and is thinking about 2016.

I’m looking forward to the VP debate. Don’t be surprised if Joe Biden acquits himself rather well.

 

As Good As it Gets

I’m working a long day today, so for tonight here’s another musical item: a clip of the one and only Steve Gadd taking some extended solos.

These aren’t your typical drum solos. What I love about Gadd’s soloing is the depth of the groove that’s always playing in his head, and that he expresses just as clearly with empty space as by actually striking the drums. He isn’t flashing his chops; he’s dancing.

This is real mastery, and musicianship at the highest level. Enjoy.

Please…

Can we stop saying “flat-screen TV” yet? You can’t even buy the other kind anymore.

Power

As I was poking around on YouTube this morning I ran across a link to this little number by the great Chaka Khan, only available on a compilation album released in 1998.

Recorded and mixed by yours truly, at the now-defunct O’Henry Studios in Burbank, CA. (What a great studio that was.) Note the guitar solos in the intro and at 2:35  — both of them were knocked off in a single take by the extraordinarily gifted session player Michael Landau.

I’d forgotten about this one. Boy, can that woman sing. Should’ve been a hit.

P.S. While we’re at it, here’s another Chaka tune, from the same sessions.

This Just In

We’ve been hearing for a couple of days now that Mitt Romney’s drubbing of President Obama in Wednesday’s debate may have been due to his having smuggled in a “cheat sheet”.

Now we have confirmation:  we’ve just learned that the folks at RedState.com have got their hands on a copy.

Here it is.

Entropy and Ethics

Last year I wrote a little post about visiting Google’s lavish offices in Manhattan to see my friend Greg, who had recently joined their engineering staff. Here’s a longish excerpt:

It being a mild day, Greg and I dined al fresco on a high terrace with a sweeping view of Midtown. (I had a delightful osso buco, he some freshly made sushi.) We talked about what his new life was like. Yes, he said, the physical perks were nice, but what really made the place so extraordinary was “the culture’.

His use of that word crystallized for me the effect the place had had on me from the moment I walked in. To get there, I had taken the subway from Grand Central down to 14th Street and 8th Avenue (two subways, actually), and the experience was as it is always is: crowded, blaring, gritty, and above all maximally heterogeneous in every way imaginable. It’s “vibrant’, if you like, and after living here in Gotham for more than thirty years I’m certainly well accustomed to it ”” but the effect of such a volatile and discordant public environment is to produce in everyone a subliminal wary tension, so constant and so routine that after a while one hardly notices it until it’s gone.

Well, when you walk into Google, it’s gone. Coming into that place, through the high-tech security checkpoint, from the teeming city outside is like passing through an airlock; it’s like beaming back up to the Enterprise from the steamy planetary surface. You can’t help being aware that you are suddenly in what feels like a different country. It’s culture shock.

Just how, exactly, is it so different? Well, it’s not the the creature comforts: for all its toys and free lunches, the place has nothing on a good hotel. It’s the people. Unlike any government or academic institution, Google is a pure meritocracy. Its employees have jumped a series of very high bars to get in the door, and as a result this building houses one of the most elite concentrations of high IQ in the world. En masse, it’s palpable. You can’t help but notice.

Greg said that he sometimes feels, working at Google, that he’s living in a “bubble’ ”” and sitting on that terrace with all those bright people, looking out over New York City and enjoying my osso buco, I had to agree that he’s right. I realized that what Google has done is to create a one-way membrane, a kind of Maxwell’s Demon: as the world decays and degenerates outside, falling further into chaos, the entropy inside the Google membrane decreases, as self-organizing complexity emerges. That’s what Greg’s “bubble’ is, and that’s what makes the “culture’ possible: an extreme statistical outlier at the end of a long series of centrifuges.

Another friend (and another very smart guy) who now works at Google is my old boss from PubSub, Bob Wyman. I chatted briefly with him, too, while I was visiting. Bob has an interesting paradigm for thinking about the world. The way he sees it, good and evil are basically just a matter of thermodynamics. In a nutshell, good consists of reducing entropy, and evil consists of abetting it.

Google’s motto: Don’t be evil.

It’s an interesting and seductive idea, with a natural, almost instinctive appeal. My lovely wife Nina told me of a little doggerel that her father used to recite to her when she was a wee thing:

Keep order and space, and order in time;
Disorder is chaos, and chaos is crime!

That’s pretty good, I think. If you wanted a pithy way of expressing the idea that ethics is essentially a question of thermodynamics, you could hardly do better.

Well, today my friend Salim Ismail sent me an excerpt from a book called Xenology: An Introduction to the Scientific Study of Extraterrestrial Life, Intelligence, and Civilization, by Robert Frietas. It makes Bob Wyman’s argument: that the reduction of entropy is a suitable foundation for a universal (in every sense of the word) system of ethics.

As my dear departed mum used to say, I hae me doots. I’ll lay them out in a later post — I want to think about it a bit more before commenting — but for tonight I’ll just give you the link. Here it is.

One more thing: if evil really does consist, at bottom, of increasing the world’s entropy, then Mayor Bloomberg may want to set his sights on some of the city’s most egregiously entropic culinary offerings. More here.

Potpourri

I’m feeling a little under the weather tonight, so all I have to offer is a handful of interesting links.

Here’s an item about construction of three-dimensional objects by swarms of autonomous drones acting without central guidance.

Here’s one about evolutionary music-composition algorithms.

This item covers a topic that gets far too little attention from the mainstream media, these days at least: vomiting caterpillars.

Brace for impact.

Here’s a video illustrating the “rolling-shutter effect“. (More images here.)

And here are some thoughts about a clock that could outlast the Universe.

The Teacher’s Was Probably Brown

Philly Student’s Romney T-shirt Likened To KKK Sheet

 

Au Revoir

Mind-boggling, suicidal socialist insanity in France. Here.

That Was Fun

Well, well. If you’ve ever wanted empirical confirmation of the “Taranto Principle”, you got it tonight. When your every public appearance for the past four years has been a tongue-bath from fawning media groupies, this is what happens.

Next up, the vice-presidential debate. Iowahawk: “Compared to that, this one was a nail-biter. Wear a raincoat.”

It’s On!

OK, folks, ready for the big debate?

The good people at RebelPundit.com have given us tonight’s drinking game. Here it is:

 

Bottoms up!

That Bump In The Road

In the days following the lethal attack on our diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, the Obama administration doggedly clung to its story that the assault, in which a United States Ambassador was killed on U.S. soil, was an unforeseeable and spontaneous eruption of anger, caused by an unflattering video about Mohammed. This story was false, and the State Department knew it was false, yet stuck with it for days, including sending  U.N. ambassador Susan Rice to the Sunday talk shows,  five days after the attack, to reiterate what was by then a transparently deceptive account.  (Many are calling for Ms. Rice’s resignation over this, which I think is wrong; for all we know she was just repeating what she had been told. The State Department and the White House bear the responsibility here.)

Many of us wondered: why would this administration lie so blatantly about this, and continue to do so even as the truth began to be exposed? Obviously Mr. Obama’s  inept Mideast policy is now a political liability, and we shouldn’t be surprised to see as much “spin” as the administration thinks it can get away with  —   but it’s hard to imagine that they really thought they could get away with this.

The purpose of a lie is to hide the truth. What truth was it that the Administration considered so damaging that it was willing to risk lying so publicly for days, even as it became plain to all that its account of events was false?

The House Oversight Committee would like to know, and has sent a letter to the Secretary of State demanding some answers. I’ve excerpted (and highlighted) a key passage below:

Based on information provided to the Committee by individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya, the attack that claimed the ambassador’s life was the latest in a long line of attacks on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months leading up to September 11, 2012. It was clearly never, as Administration officials once insisted, the result of a popular protest. In addition, multiple U.S. federal government officials have confirmed to the Committee that, prior to the September 11 attack, the U.S. mission in Libya made repeated requests for increased security in Benghazi. The mission in Libya, however, was denied these resources by officials in Washington.

Obviously, with the election looming, there are a lot of ulterior motives in play. Democrats will pooh-pooh the whole thing as a political stunt (indeed, long-time readers will not be surprised should that happen in our own comment-thread). Nevertheless, there appears to be serious malfeasance here, at the highest levels of government, and you can be sure this story isn’t going to go away.

You can read the letter here.

 

An Abbreviated List

Sorry all  —  still too overwhelmed with domestic logistics (and ongoing emergencies at work) to spend any personal time at the computer. The blog is gathering dust, and emails are piling up in the inbox.

Things should be getting back to normal in another day or two, insh’Allah.

Meanwhile, just to get you in the mood for Wednesday’s debate, here are 689 reasons to defeat Barack Obama.

 

Off The Grid

To all who’ve emailed with links, comments, etc. recently: thanks as always. We’re moving house today and tomorrow, however, and will not be able to get to any of it for at least a couple of days.

The Future Must Not Belong To Those Who Slander The Prophet

Here’s an item from Iowahawk, posted way back in 2006, that’s as relevant today as the day it was written.

Update: As is this.

Vandalism Still Illegal

We’ve been hearing a lot about free speech lately (though not nearly enough). Here’s the NYPD coming to its defense. (And responding to an assault.)

The Hell-Bound Train

The latest Economic Freedom of the World Annual Report has the U.S. ranked eighteenth, down from second place in 200o.

Well, home of the brave, still, maybe. We’ll see.

Made For Each Other

Speaking of world-class narcissists, no list would be complete without including  the exquisitely unlovable Madonna. (Sadly, I learned this first-hand; you will find my name on your copy of Like a Virgin, if you have one.)

Ms. Ciccone has now enlivened the campaign season in her own special way. The Huffington Post reports:

Madonna brought her MDNA Tour to Washington, D.C. on Monday night, and added a bizarre dose of politics to the show.

“Y’all better vote for f–king Obama, OK? For better or for worse, all right? We have a black Muslim in the White House. Now that’s some amazing s–t,” she said. “It means there is hope in this country. And Obama is fighting for gay rights, so support the man, goddamnit.”

Perfect. It’s a left-wing trifecta: authoritarianism, race-baiting identity politics, and vulgarity. Made my morning.

How To Get Friends!

We never seem to run out of examples of the pathological narcissism of Barack Obama. Just when I decide to lay off for a few days, I get this in the mail:

 *        *        *

Malcolm —

If you win this, you’re going to have a lot more friends all of a sudden.

Because winning this thing means not one but two of these seats are yours:

      Malcolm                                       Barack                         Whoever you bring

 

 

Just remember, whoever you bring as your guest is going to owe you for a long, long time.

Donate $5 or whatever you can to be automatically entered to win dinner for you and a guest with the President:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Dinner

That’s one lucky friend,

Julianna

Julianna Smoot
Deputy Campaign Manager
Obama for America

 *        *        *

 My God.

“you’re going to have a lot more friends all of a sudden.”

“whoever you bring as your guest is going to owe you for a long, long time.”

“That’s one lucky friend…”

It makes my flesh crawl with a frisson of horror to know that a person could be so ripened with vanity, so swollen with self-love, and so utterly unencumbered by the slightest shred of humility as to send something like this to a complete stranger  —  and that this person is our President.

It is bizarre, the effect this man has on people. If you happen to be immune to his mesmerizing charms, as about half of us appear to be, and can see through the fragrant, intoxicating gas-cloud to the  remorseless egomaniac beneath, you find yourself looking around with mounting frustration and disbelief at those still under his spell.

Victor Hanson’s had about enough, too, as we see in this latest fulmination.

Ah, well  —  there we are, friends, and our only chance of doing anything about it will be on November 6th.

Comments are welcome, as always (I expect the usual blowback from certain parties still ensorcelled)  —  but as noted below, I might not find time to respond.  Or just might not bother.

 

Service Notice

There will be reduced activity here this week, as the lovely Nina and I are fully consumed with the immense task of emptying our Brooklyn house so as to permit a major reconfiguration of its interior space.

Given that our kids have now moved out, and that we are spending more and more of our time about 220 miles ENE of here, we thought it fiscally prudent to reduce our living quarters so as to be able to rent out another floor. The construction project thus entailed involves just about every room in the house, and so they must be stripped bare — and we’re finding that the accumulated detritus of our more than thirty years of residency here would make the Augean Stables look like one of Martha Stewart’s guest bedrooms.

The deadline is Friday morning, at which point we flee to the Outer Cape in a rented truck full of those items too dear to part with, and too large to put in the car. Surveying the chaos tonight, which more closely resembles tsunami wreckage than the gracious home of two civilized people in late middle age, it is hard to imagine that we’ll make it. But these things have a way of working out, somehow.

Anyway, the upshot is that there will in the near term be few opportunities for writing posts, or for responding to comments (though I will do so when I can). Back to normal, I hope, sometime next week.

As always, please feel free to browse our archives, which now hold over 2,800 posts — or to click View a Random Post, over there on the upper right.

“Trickle Down”: Fact And Fancy

Here’s an outstanding essay by economist Thomas Sowell on widely held misconceptions regarding the historical effects of varying tax rates on the wealthy. An excerpt:

The very idea that profits “trickle down’ to workers depicts the economic sequence of events in the opposite order from that in the real world. Workers must first be hired, and commitments made to pay them, before there is any output produced to sell for a profit, and independently of whether that output subsequently sells for a profit or at a loss. With many investments, whether they lead to a profit or a loss can often be determined only years later, and workers have to be paid in the meantime, rather than waiting for profits to “trickle down’ to them. The real effect of tax rate reductions is to make the future prospects of profit look more favorable, leading to more current investments that generate more current economic activity and more jobs.

Those who attribute a trickle-down theory to others are attributing their own misconception to others, as well as distorting both the arguments used and the hard facts about what actually happened after the recommended policies were put into effect.

…There is no need to presume that the scholars who wrote these history textbooks were deliberately lying, in order to protect a vision or an agenda. They may simply have relied on a peer consensus so widely held and so often repeated as to be seen as “well-known facts’ requiring no serious re-examination. The results show how unreliable peer consensus can be, even when it is a peer consensus of highly intellectual people, if those people share a very similar vision of the world and treat its conclusions as axioms, rather than as hypotheses that need to be checked against facts. These history textbooks may also reflect the economic illiteracy of many leading scholars outside the field of economics, who nevertheless insist on proclaiming their conclusions on economic issues.

Thanks to reader Dom for the link.

Want more Sowell? Here’s a five-part interview with Peter Robinson.

100% Recycled Material

Again, I’ve had no free time for writing today — I’ve been very busy with work, and meanwhile the lovely Nina and I are busy preparing our modest brownstone for a major construction project that begins in just a few days. So for tonight, a repost of some old items:

A reminiscence of my salad days on the CNJ.

Some thoughts about public discourse.

Local topography.

Old style.

Music, and what makes us human.

Holes, and how to talk about them.

The Agony Of Da Fleet

Too busy today for any writing — so for tonight, the Irish perspective on Olympic sailing, courtesy of a longtime reader.

One Man’s Gaffe…

Mitt Romney’s campaign, in the, um, collective opinion of the “mainstream media”, suffered a major setback the other day. As you may perhaps have heard by now, Mr. Romney’s opponents unearthed a video clip in which the GOP candidate, speaking to a private audience (or so he thought), commented on the difficulty of winning the support of the large segment of voters who draw more revenue out of the federal government than they put in.

It was, of course, only those folks whose vote he does in fact have little chance of winning who saw Mr. Romney’s remarks as damaging. For the rest of us he was only making, though perhaps carelessly and inelegantly, rather an obvious point — and indeed his doing so, and the dedication of endless news cycles to it by the press, has had the effect of energizing his base.

Pat Buchanan has just written a tart essay about this. An excerpt:

[W]hat was right about what Romney said was discerned two centuries ago by that governmental genius John C. Calhoun.

“The necessary result … of the unequal fiscal action of the government is to divide the community into two great classes; one consisting of those who … pay the taxes … and bear exclusively the burden of supporting the government; and the other, of those who are the recipients of their proceeds, through disbursements, and who are, in fact, supported by the government; or, in fewer words, to divide it into taxpayers and tax consumers.”

A nation sundered between taxpayers and tax consumers, said Calhoun, “must give rise to two parties and to violent conflicts and struggles between them, to obtain the control of the government.”

Is that not a fair description of where we are today?

Of course it is, with the acknowledgement that the adherents of the two parties aren’t riven with arithmetical precision along maker/taker lines.

You can read the rest of Mr. Buchanan’s essay here.

Ahoy!

A reader brings to our attention a fantastic Google-Maps-based application. Here.

Throw The Book At Him

Salman Rushdie meets God’s justice (dramatization).

Early James Cameron, I think.

Here.

Whew!

That was quite a storm we had here in the Northeast last night, coming most abruptly on the heels of a delightful run of gorgeous late-summer days. It brought to mind Mark Twain’s remarks about New England weather:

Yes, one of the brightest gems in the New England weather is the dazzling uncertainty of it. There is only one thing certain about it: you are certain there is going to be plenty of it — a perfect grand review; but you never can tell which end of the procession is going to move first. You fix up for the drought; you leave your umbrella in the house and sally out, and two to one you get drowned. You make up your mind that the earthquake is due; you stand from under, and take hold of something to steady yourself, and the first thing you know you get struck by lightning. These are great disappointments; but they can’t be helped. The lightning there is peculiar; it is so convincing, that when it strikes a thing it doesn’t leave enough of that thing behind for you to tell whether — well, you’d think it was something valuable, and a Congressman had been there. And the thunder. When the thunder begins to merely tune up and scrape and saw, and key up the instruments for the performance, strangers say, “Why, what awful thunder you have here!” But when the baton is raised and the real concert begins, you’ll find that stranger down in the cellar with his head in the ash-barrel.

Brace For Impact

Mohammed as Brigitte Bardot. See here.

Anyone out there old enough to remember the Candid Camera theme?

♪ ♫ “It’s fun to laugh at yourself,
It’s a tonic tried and true;
It’s fun to look at yourself,
As other people do!”

Maybe instead of another Charles Martel, what we need these days is another Allen Funt.

New York To London In 0.00186 Seconds

Here’s another edgy little item: warp drives might be feasible after all.

Sharpens up the Fermi paradox even more, if so.

There It Is Again!

Recent events remind us, once again (with a hat tip to James Taranto), of the enduring mystery of the number 47.

More here.

Fiddlin’

Here’s a sampling of today’s headlines from Drudge:

Chinese General: Prepare for Combat with Japan

IRAN DEPLOYS RUSSIAN-MADE SUBMARINE IN GULF

Ships from 30 nations sweep mines in Persian Gulf in warning to Tehran

Pentagon suspends joint patrols with Afghans after more troops killed

Marine Squadron Commander Died in Taliban Attack

Libya: We gave USA three-day warning of Benghazi attack

Pressure mounts for Congress to conduct independent investigation...

REPORT: Median Income Worse Now Than During ‘Great Recession’

Mexico mass jailbreak sparks manhunt near Texas border

The President’s schedule today? Why, a visit to the David Letterman Show, followed by a campaign fundraiser with Jay-Z and Beyoncé.

Any Kids?

Here’s an attention-grabbing item: an ancient Coptic papyrus fragment referring to Jesus’s wife.