Ugh

I wish Norm McDonald hadn’t died.

Science and Obvious Common Sense: Together At Last?

The blank-slatist axiom at the heart of contemporary racialist Leftism is beginning — as was always inevitable, barring complete governmental suppression of all relevant research — to crumble under the patient advance of genetic and cognitive science.

Here’s Steve Sailer, writing about this at Taki’s Magazine.

Prediction: as this motte becomes indefensible, “luck egalitarianism” will become a household word and the next social battlefield. (This would, at least, begin to focus the ethical debate on actually existing reality, and valid moral questions, rather than on the maliferous-aether religion that dominates everything at the moment.)

Prime Time!

Tucker Carlson interviewed Curtis Yarvin, AKA “Mencius Moldbug”, for an hour today. That’s quite a development, I think.

Back at the end of July, I noted in a Twitter thread that a new and influential troika had taken shape:

“Moldbug, [Michael] Anton, and BAP [“Bronze Age Pervert”] have emerged as the three corners of the triangle for thoughtful and historically literate people on the Right who are trying to make sense of our predicament, and to peer forward into the murk.

Anton is the only one who hasn’t completely given up on the American Founding quite yet; that has a certain appeal to many of us, especially those of us who are old enough to remember pre-zombie America. But there isn’t much left to hang onto there…

BAP brings a rousing call for an awakening of the blood and spirit, of the simple joy of power and vigor, but his message is as yet inchoate as a practical blueprint for effective action.

Yarvin is the one who sees most clearly the awfulness of the predicament – but we out here in the reactosphere have had decades, now, of solid diagnosis, and it just isn’t enough anymore.

The question is what is to be *done*.

The awful fact is that at this point there may be very little that *can* be done, other than building some sort of ark to save what we can.

But you never know – and as chessplayers like to say, nobody ever won a game by resigning!”

I have a link to a copy of the show. (Haven’t even watched it yet myself.) Have a look here. (Audio-only version here.)

P.S. Here, also, are two conversations between Anton and Yarvin: one hosted by Jack Murphy, and the other a follow-up podcast hosted by Anton himself.

All of this is going to take hours of your time. Listen anyway.

P.P.S. If you aren’t listening to BAP, his podcasts are here. Also, do yourself a favor and read his book.

Crunch Time!

The lovely Nina and I, having sold the house in Brooklyn that we’ve lived in for almost 40 years, now have about three weeks to clear out of the place before closing with the buyers on or around September 30th. After a fantastic weekend of music in Maine, we are driving down to NY today from Wellfleet to tackle this monumental task.

This means that posting will likely be very spotty from now until October! I’ll do what I can as time (and exhaustion) allow.

Thanks as always for coming round, and please feel free to browse the archives, or to try out the “Random Post” link at upper right. I’ll be back in earnest after this is all taken care of.

Service Notice

I’m off to Maine for my annual musical retreat. (Used to be on Star Island, but now Maine for logistical reasons.) It’ll be good to push the world away for a minute and just make music with old friends. (These are the same folks I’ve been making those collaborative “lockdown’ videos with, for example this one, from last year.)

Back next week. Happy Labor Day. Keep your chins up!

Horror Movie

I’m not much of a consumer of popular culture these days, but I think it’s worth pointing out that, aside from some news items, you almost never see anyone wearing masks in visual media — in movies, TV shows, etc. — despite the ubiquity of masks in this new era of the actually existing world.

Why is that? It’s obvious, I think: putting masks on the faces of actors would ruin everything. Their craft is to convey human experience on screen, and more than anything else they rely on their voices and facial expressions. But masks conceal faces, and muffle voices — so how could actors possibly work effectively under such a handicap? It would be a crazy thing to do, and so nobody producing content for the screen is doing it.

But: if masking the faces of actors would be so crippling to the presentation of human life on screen, doesn’t that mean that it has exactly the same stunting, crippling, pathological effect in real life? Ought we really be doing this to our children as they learn — they only get one chance, after all — how to be human?

Meet The New Boss

New York has a new governor, Kathy Hochul. Obviously, she’s a Democrat, but what kind? Old-school centrist? Moonbat radical?

If you aren’t sure yet, read this brief item by Betsey McCaughey.

Ice, Ice, Baby

It appears that Arctic sea-ice coverage is, shall we say, heading North:

SHARP UPTICK IN ARCTIC SEA ICE: EXTENT ON COURSE TO BE THE HIGHEST IN 15 YEARS

I’m sure this will be all over the nightly news.

Tinfoil Hats On, Please

I’d hate to seem cynical here, but it’s hard, sometimes, not to imagine that there is some sort of powerful and malevolent agency at work behind the scenes that has, in the past two years:

1) Unleashed the Wuhan Red Death upon the world;

2) Usurped the primary-election process to install Joe Biden as the Democratic candidate, knowing that he is a) an imbecile, b) senile, and c) easily controllable by blackmail;

3) Sat Biden at home throughout the riotous summer of 2020, for all the obvious reasons;

4) Selected the most unpopular of all possible candidates, Kamala Harris, for VP, knowing that once they get Joe out her presidency will quickly cause America’s political polarization to descend into disintegrative chaos, and possibly civil war;

5) Arranged the 2020 election so as to install Biden, knowing that court challenges would be deemed so explosive that they would be waved aside without a hearing;

6) Compelled the zombie Biden to defy all common sense, and the advice (as I’ve heard) of his own military, in executing the Afghanistan exit in the obviously wrong order — causing such a monumental, and clearly avoidable, catastrophe that he will soon have to step down and yield the presidency to Harris;

7) See 4).

Crazy, I know! Perhaps, after all, it’s just some stuff that’s been happening. (And empires always die, of course.) But still… it’s all starting to seem a bit much, don’t you think?

P.S. Another possibility regarding the choice of Harris, of course, is that the prospect of her ascension would be so abhorrent to all that it would ensure the puppet Biden’s tenure as a controllable proxy for as long as possible.

“Shut Up”, They Explained

You may have heard of Abigail Shrier, who recently wrote a book, called Irreversible Damage, about the “transgender” mind-virus that has lately infected so many young girls. Her book has aroused a fierce reaction from the clerisy of our new official religion, who have brought intense pressure to censor and bury it.

Ms. Shrier has written about this in an article recently published at Substack. Read it here.

Charlie Watts, 1941-2021

How sad to learn today that Charlie Watts has died. The Rolling Stones have died with him, as far as I’m concerned: it was Charlie, not Mick Jagger, who was really the heart of that band.

I was fortunate enough to meet the legend in person long ago, when I was an assistant engineer on the mixing project for the Stones’ live album Still Life, back in 1982. The whole band, except for Bill Wyman, were there for the sessions. I remember that Charlie never said much; he sat at the back of the control room on a high stool, sipping a long-neck beer. But he was the one all decisions were deferred to. His quiet and august presence, it seems to me now in retrospect, must have been something like how those in attendance have described Washington’s role at the Constitutional Convention.

I can’t mention that album without telling (rather immodestly, and I hope you’ll forgive me!) a little story of my own from that project, a memory I’ve cherished ever since:

When we were making that record, we had to choose between lots of takes from different performances (that’s a big part of the time it takes to make a live album from tour recordings). There was a song — a cover of the old Smokey Robinson tune Going To A Go-Go — that was going to be the single from the album. But the one take that was by far the best had a technical problem with the drum mikes. When we put the track up late one evening, the engineer, the incomparably gifted Bob Clearmountain (who was my mentor in those early years), was dismayed to find that one of the drum tracks — the floor tom, which as it happens is the lead part of the drum pattern for that song — was unusable. Being a drummer myself, after a decent interval I cleared my throat and said “You know, I could play that…”

“Go for it!” Bob said. (It was late, and everyone else had gone home, so we figured we’d just give it a go.) We miked up the drums, and I played the part (it wasn’t particularly challenging). The next day we played it for Charlie; I waited with bated breath.

After a moment, he rendered his judgment:

“Sounds fine to me.” And that was that.

So, if you ever hear that tune on the radio: the floor-tom ride that opens the song, and drives it along throughout, is your humble correspondent.

Rest in peace, Charlie Watts. What a drummer! What a life!

Untergang Down Under

Australia, which started out as a prison colony, is returning to form under the shadow of the Wuhan Red Death. Despite massive protests, the government has imposed brutal restrictions in the name of “safety”, and nothing is off the table: censorship, forced confinement, criminal charges, social intimidation, propaganda, and all the other too-familiar tools of totalitarian control. (It’s worth noting that the people of Australia were disarmed by their government a while back.)

Our e-pal Bill Keezer has brought to our attention a post about all this over at Gates of Vienna, featuring a chilling video posted by Vlad Tepes. Have a look here.

Nothing To See Here

Well, Henri has come ashore well west of the Outer Cape, and while I’m sure there are some pretty nasty conditions in Connecticut, we’ve got nothing more out here than stiff breezes, perspiration-inducing warmth and humidity, and some rough surf. The sun is even shining, sort of.

Before The Storm

Here in New England we’re awaiting the arrival of Hurricane Henri. The original projections showed the center of the tracking cone passing right over us in Wellfleet, but now it looks as though the storm will make landfall somewhere in central Long Island. What we’ll get out here will be storm surge and wind, but probably a bit less rain than we were expecting before. (I’m just hoping the power stays on. We really should get a nice beefy Generac.)

Speaking of great swirling masses of hot air, I’ve no doubt that Henri will bring in its wake the usual gale of “extreme-weather” alarmism. For balance, then, I’ll offer a 2019 paper by Actual Climate Scientist Judith Curry.

The Executive Summary reads as follows:

This Report assesses the scientific basis for projections of future hurricane activity. The Report evaluates the assessments and projections from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and recent national assessments regarding hurricanes. The uncertainties and challenges at the knowledge frontier are assessed in the context of recent research, particularly with regards to natural variability. The following four questions frame this Report:

1. Is recent hurricane activity unusual?
In the North Atlantic, all measures of hurricane activity have increased since 1970, although comparably high levels of activity also occurred during the 1950’s and 1960’s. Geologic evidence indicates that the current heightened activity in the North Atlantic is not unusual, with a ‘hyperactive period’ apparently occurring from 3400 to 1000 years before present. Prior to the satellite era (1970’s), there are no reliable statistics on global hurricane activity. Global hurricane activity since 1970 shows no significant trends in overall frequency, although there is some evidence of a small increase in the number of major hurricanes.

2. Have hurricanes been worsened by manmade global warming?
Any recent signal of increased hurricane activity has not risen above the background variability of natural climate variations. At this point, there is no convincing evidence
that manmade global warming has caused a change in hurricane activity.

3. Have hurricane landfall impacts been worsened by manmade global warming?
Of recent impactful U.S. landfalling hurricanes, only the rainfall in Hurricane Harvey is unusual in context of the historical record. Warmer sea surface temperatures are
expected to contribute to an overall increase in hurricane rainfall, although hurricane-induced rainfall and flooding is dominated by natural climate variability. Storm surge risk is increasing slightly owing to the slow creep of sea level rise. The extent to which the recent increase in ocean temperatures and sea level rise can be attributed to manmade global warming is disputed. The primary driver for increased economic losses from landfalling hurricanes is the massive population buildup along coastlines.

4. How will hurricane activity change during the 21st century?
Recent assessment reports have concluded that there is low confidence in projections of future changes to hurricane activity. Any projected change in hurricane activity is
expected to be small relative to the magnitude of natural variability in hurricane activity.

Read the whole thing here.

On The Bright Side

It’s important to keep in mind just who, or what, was just defeated in Afghanistan. It wasn’t the traditional American nation (and military), but rather those who have stunned it into helplessness and have been wearing its senseless body as a skin-suit.

If there is any silver lining to all of this, it is the catastrophic collision with reality, before the eyes of the entire world, that our hallucinatory state religion of Wokeness has just experienced. It was just two months ago, after all that our cordyceptic State Department actually hoisted a gay-pride flag in the capital of Afghanistan. Now look where we are.

Joe Biden’s Presidency, just seven months in, is collapsing in ruins. Even his Praetorian Guard in the media can no longer deny this. Nor can anyone plausibly deny any longer that, in his advanced stage of mental decline, he is simply incapable of meeting the demands of his office. It may have been the plan all along to get him out after a few months, to be replaced with Kamala Harris, but I don’t think that even the most cynical among us can imagine that even under such a scheme the disastrous Democrat regime of 2021 was ever meant to go quite this badly.

This brings us once again to the question of resistance, which I’ve meant to get back to since bringing it up a few days ago, and mean to pick up again soon. Suffice it to say for now that the prospects for effective resistance might just have become quite a bit easier, as public support for this administration, and for our new religion generally, have surely crumbled significantly in these last days and weeks.

Half A League Onward: Repost

I’m reposting this item about Afghanistan from December 2009, eleven years ago.

*          *          *          

 
I watched the President’s speech last night. It was not encouraging. It had something for everyone: escalation for the hawks; an exit date for the doves; the usual rot about “distorting and defiling a great religion”, to keep the Muslims off the streets; some bean-counting for the frugal; some American exceptionalism for the true believers; some mulitilateralism for the rest; a little torture-and-Gitmo-loathing for the base; and to wrap up, some right-makes-might for moral uplift.

The problem is that the situation is impossible; there simply are no good options. Never have I felt more pessimistic.

In brief:

If we leave, the Taliban will overrun the country again, al-Qaeda will set up shop as before, and nuclear-armed Pakistan will totter. The world will know, with certainty this time, that America (and the West generally) is a fickle ally that has no real stomach for a fight. As night falls, those in Afghanistan who have put their trust in us will find they have backed the wrong horse, and they will pay. The brave women and girls who have risked all just to go to school, to read a book — and who have been, for their trouble, beaten and murdered and burned with acid — will be ground into dust.

If we stay, we will never “win”. Afghanistan will be our tar-baby forever. We will never install a functioning democracy there, or a government free of corruption, or a reliable military dedicated to its preservation: these things cannot be done, any more than you can make butter from stones, or teach wolves to knit. We will fight and spend and bleed and die there forever.

Recognizing that we are now of modest means, and so cannot afford to hold our tar-baby forever, we have announced that we will begin leaving in the middle of 2011. This makes things easy for the Taliban, who have all the time in the world; they simply need to harass us patiently for 18 months, and then, as we step back, they will step forward.

We fight an enemy that is utterly unafraid to die, but we, good souls that we surely are, are afraid to kill. Our military is by far — by light-years — the strongest, best-trained, best-equipped, most sophisticated fighting force the world has ever seen; no enemy on Earth could hope to face us in full-scale conflict and live. But no army has ever won a war this way. Neither will we.

So: We have three options, none good:

A) We can leave now. B) We can stay and bleed forever. C) We can stay and bleed for 18 months, then leave anyway. (The fourth option, to cry “Havoc!”, and unleash our colossal war machine in all its incandescent fury, is apparently not an option.)

Notes From The Underground

We’ll get back to the previous topic in a bit — for now, yes, I think we’ll all agree that the best course has to be some sort of pushback on the part of ordinary Americans, and there are now some heartening signs that more and more of us are starting to realize this. Perhaps things have got to the point now where even people who would generally prefer to pay no attention at all, and to give the media and all our other august institutions the benefit of the doubt, simply have to start noticing that everything’s going to hell, and that they’re living in an insane asylum.

Meanwhile, I just found out that I’m a domestic terrorist. Here’s what tipped me off:

You can learn more from the DHS’s urgent bulletin, here. In it, the agency explains that a big part of the problem is due to people perceiving things, namely “perceived government restrictions” and “perceived election fraud”. Given that “perceive” means “to attain awareness or understanding of”, or “to become aware of through the senses”, I think the problem here is obvious: roughly half the country is just too damn perceptive.

Fortunately, given that there must be well over a hundred million newly minted terrorists out there, I’m hoping it might be a while before they get around to rounding me up. (I still have a few things I’d like to get done around the house before beginning my new life as a zek, so I’m counting on there being lots of you out there who are even more “perceptive” than I am.)

Speaking of living in an insane asylum, don’t miss this chilling account, by the great Heather Mac Donald, of the racist-zombie assault on classical music. (Nothing is safe.)

Meanwhile, here’s a sharp essay, by Steve Sailer, that asks the question: Did Europeans conquer the world because, sometime around the beginning of the fifteenth century, they figured out how to think better? (Jared Diamond, take note.)

Finally, here’s a link that I’ve hoarded as an open tab for months now: a fantastic interactive animation on the working of that miracle of technology, the internal combustion engine. I’m glad to take this opportunity to post it here and get it off the top of my browser.

That’s all I have time for today. Back soon.

What Next?

My previous post was, I have to admit, pretty gloomy even for me. It’s been difficult to watch events unfold over the last year or so without getting the feeling that the USA as it has existed for the past two-and-a-half centuries has reached a point of fatal exhaustion. (Looking at the familiar cycle that great nations and empires have gone through in the past only reinforces the conclusion.) In particular the abandonment of any lingering pretense of securing our border, and the resulting mass influx of hungry outsiders, brings to mind a near-perfect metaphor: forensic entomology“. (Now that you know what that is, just try to keep that idea out of your head next time you think about the border crisis.)

Still, something has to happen in America; we aren’t all just going to lie down and die. Commenter Jason had this to say:

Unless you believe that the U.S. needs to dissolve peacefully (i.e. constitutionally and lawfully), or you’re one of those intrepid bloggers (and his commentators) who intend to create an American Zion extra-legally – which probably would be beyond the purview of Motus Mentis! – I’m not sure there’s an alternative to attempting to resuscitate this “corpse.” Somehow the fractious peoples of the republic will have to learn to live together, or else. I wonder Malcolm if you and other commentators are underestimating the vast reservoirs of goodness and decency that still reside in many citizens. From my perspective it’s vital that such men of good will adapt some form of resistance, powerfully fueled by the deiform and secular virtues – without which action will I suspect become cruel and counterproductive. America’s soft majority need to call the hard minority’s bluff, from the realms of excessive COVID tyranny to laxity regarding immigration. And this will require the father of virtues, courage.

There’s a lot there. One thing at a time:

Can the US dissolve peacefully? Constitutionally? Lawfully?

I don’t think it can do so constitutionally, but I don’t think that really matters. It’s pretty easy at this point to make the case that the Constitution means very little anymore anyway, and of course if we get to the point of actually dissolving the United States, why would anyone even care what the Constitution says? After all, the Constitution is no longer just the document ratified in 1788, plus a few amendments; it has been so monstrously deformed since then by activist judicial interpretation that the Framers would find it unrecognizable. The remarkable John Randolph of Roanoke saw this coming, and in a speech against the amendability of constitutions given in 1829, had this to say:

“I have remarked since the commencement of our deliberations — and with no small surprise — a very great anxiety to provide for futurity.
Gentlemen, for example, are not content with any present discussion of the Constitution, unless we always consent to prescribe for all time hereafter. I had always thought him the most skillful physician who, when called to a patient, relieved him of the existing malady, without undertaking to prescribe for such as he might by possibility endure thereafter. . . .

Dr. Franklin, who, in shrewdness, especially in all that related to domestic life, was never excelled, used to say, that two movings were equal to one fire. So to any people, two Constitutions are worse than a fire. And gentlemen, as if they were afraid that this besetting sin of Republican Governments, this rerum novarum lubido, (to use a very homely phase but one that comes pat to the purpose,) this maggot of innovation, would cease to bite, are here gravely making provision, that this Constitution, which we should consider as a remedy for all the ills of the body politic, may itself be amended or modified at any future time.

Sir, I am against any such provision. I should as soon think of introducing into a marriage contract a provision
for divorce; and thus poisoning the greatest blessing of mankind and its very source at its fountainhead. He has seen little and has reflected less, who does not know that “necessity” is the great, powerful, governing principle of affairs here.

Sir, I am not going into that question which puzzled Pandemonium, the
question of liberty and necessity, “Free will, fix’d fate, foreknowledge absolute”; but, I do contend, that necessity is one of the principal instruments of all the good that man enjoys. The happiness of the connubial union itself depends greatly on necessity; and when you touch this, you touch the arch, the key-stone of the arch, on which the happiness and well-being of society
is founded. . .

Sir, what are we about? Have we not been the undoing of what the wiser heads — I must be permitted to say so — yes, sir, what the wiser heads of our ancestors did more than half a century ago? Can any one believe that we, by any amendments of ours — by any of our scribbling on that parchment — any amulet — any legerdemain — charm — abracadabra — of ours, can prevent our sons from doing the same thing? That is, from doing as they please, just as we are doing what we please?

It is impossible. Who can bind posterity? When I hear gentlemen talk of making a Constitution “for all time” and introducing provisions into it, “for all time” and yet see men here, that are older than the Constitution we are about to destroy … it reminds me of the truces and peaces in Europe. They always begin, “In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity,” and go on to declare, “there shall be perfect and perpetual peace and unity between the subject of such and such potentates, for all time to come” and, in less than seven years, they are at war again.

. . . Sir, the great opprobrium of popular Government, is its instability… I see no wisdom in making this provision for future changes. You must give Governments time to operate on the people, and give the people time to become gradually assimilated to their institutions. Almost any thing is better than this state of perpetual uncertainty.”

If anything at all is certain in the America of 2021, it is that we have entered precisely that state of perpetual uncertainty. Our political life is simply a see-sawing contest for absolute power, like two people fighting over the wheel of a speeding car. The Constitution of 1788 is in rags and tatters, and the ruling oligarchy simply does what it likes, without the least regard for law or Constitution, and dares the people to stop it. (What, for example, would the Framers have said about the CDC issuing an eviction moratorium? They would have pronounced the Constitution dead, and called on patriots to take up arms in defense of their inalienable liberties.)

So forget about the US dissolving “constitutionally”; the point is moot.

How about “peacefully”? This is made difficult by the geographical interpenetration of the disputing factions. Our last civil war, which was a sanguinary catastrophe, was at least simple: one contiguous region wished to disconnect itself from another. A civil war between Blue and Red, by contrast, would look more like Yugoslavia. Or Rwanda. Some sort of peaceable mitosis is imaginable, I suppose, but in a nation so heavily armed, the odds of violence seems high. This in turn is compounded by the relentless whipping-up of racial and tribal hatred in the past couple of decades, beginning in earnest under the Obama administration. (Can you think of a more suicidally idiotic policy for a rapidly diversifying nation, with a long history of racial tension, than to make racial and tribal grievances the focus of all politics, media, and education? I can’t.)

Jason is hopeful about the “vast reservoirs of goodness and decency that still reside in many citizens”. I am too: if there’s any hope at all, it’s there. But even if that reservoir of decency is sufficient to prevent bloody war, we still have to confront the fact that the American system of politics and government are by now exhausted, denatured, bloated, and irredeemably corrupted. We must remember also a point I’ve made here before: that the American “form” was designed to suit a particular “matter” — the colonial population of America — and that the matter itself has changed profoundly. The system of libertarian government the Framers created was suited only to a people possessed of the virtues necessary to govern themselves. Only such a people could live in ordered liberty under a minimal government. We are — to put it mildly — no longer such a people. This is not to say that such people no longer exist in America — scores of millions of them still do — but they are now scattered, and are rapidly, by malicious design, being outnumbered. If they can withdraw together to some part of the continent, and be left alone to dos so, they might be able to create some sort of rump America. (If!) But the U.S. government needs, at the very least, some sort of reboot.

Finally, this:

From my perspective it’s vital that such men of good will adapt some form of resistance, powerfully fueled by the deiform and secular virtues – without which action will I suspect become cruel and counterproductive.

I agree, and perhaps there is indeed some hope there. But this post is already long enough, and I’ll save this for the next one.

So, Here We Are

As I mentioned in the previous post, one of the reasons I hadn’t been writing much was that I thought things had got, gradually then quite suddenly, to such a state that further diagnosis and analysis had begun to seem pointless.

Trump had been ousted. The shenanigans that tainted the elections were so swaggeringly, pugnaciously, defiantly blatant, and the coordinated clampdown on any serious investigation likewise, that scores of millions of citizens lost all faith in the democratic process. The American people’s ovine submission to arbitrary authority, and to the capricious suspension of their most sacred rights by jumped-up petty tyrants, made it clear that the brawny and virile spirit that had once tamed a continent and risen to be the awe and envy of the world had sunk, after too many decades of easeful satiety, into flabby and timorous senescence.

The election was awarded to a career politician, now a gibbering dotard: a sniffer and groper of women known to all as a lifelong mediocrity, a rent-seeking jellyfish and fabulist whose long career at the public trough was distinguished only by his willingness to adopt whatever side of any issue would, for the moment, secure his incumbency, and by occasional exposures as a plagiarist. His running-mate, now only an unsteady heartbeat away from the Presidency, is a cackling, charmless schemer with so little appeal to anyone at all that she was the very first to be eliminated in last year’s primary races — but who, for no apparent reason beyond her sex and race, wafted up to take a place on the ticket.

Since taking office the new Administration has presided over: the systematic dismantling of America’s newly accomplished energy independence; the distribution of, and arrogation of credit for, vaccines that Mr. Trump had managed to bring into existence in record time; the flinging open of our southern border so as to admit to the bosom of the nation, without let or hindrance, a surging mass of intruders from parts unknown and unknowable; the increasingly naked attainder of the founding American stock, and of the heroes and traditions and culture they cherish, in a vendetta of racial hatred; the accelerating replacement of the rule of law by the whim of a ruling oligarchy, which was given a tremendous boost by the seizure of “emergency powers” during the pandemic, and by the enforced atomization and isolation that those enhanced powers made possible.

Meanwhile the Democrats, having for the moment got hold of the House of Representatives, have wasted no time in setting up what can only be called, to borrow a term that I learned from the Sopranos, a “bust-out“: the pillaging, to the tune of trillions, of the wealth of the nation and the inheritance of our children in order to bankroll an orgy of present consumption (and to secure the allegiance of the millions of voters they are systematically enfeebling and addicting to government dependency).

While all of this (and much more) has been going on, dissenters have been banned from social media, fired from their jobs, harassed and assaulted by mobs, harried with lawsuits and prosecutions, and denied access to financial services, web-hosting, conference centers, and more. The poisonous “1619 Project” — which makes Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States look like Johnny Tremain — has been adopted by schools across the nation for the instruction of our young children (whenever, that is, the kids are given a break from learning polyvalent sexual technique).

All nuance and subtlety has been drained from political, social, and educational life, along with all the complexities that used to flow from the infinite variety of individual personhood; all that remains is the boxing-up of everyone and everything into a row of bins, labeled by simple sexual and racial markers and sorted according to levels of oppression. All personal qualities above and beyond these crude categorizations are scraped off in the process, because they no longer matter.

Faith in the press, and in the institutions of government, are almost completely gone, because they have made it so abundantly clear that their respect for us is gone. Whatever framework of honor, laws, decency and tradition restrained them, however slightly, in the past is now gone as well; all that remains is the struggle for dominance. They tell us lies: daily, casually, nonchalantly, and entirely without remorse. The sense that, as fellow Americans, we are “all in this together” is now just rose-tinted nostalgia, a wistful memory of a vanished past — a past now seen as so irredeemably wicked that it must be trampled into oblivion.

I could go on and on, but you get the idea. As I said above, what good does it do to keep pointing these things out? Everyone sees all of it already, and everyone who might object to any of it already does.

I’m sixty-five years old. The America I grew up in is a dead nation walking. No doubt its twitching corpse will totter on for a while yet, but it will not recover.

Can some part of it live on? Should it?

Brushing Off The Cobwebs

I’m glad to be able to start getting back to normal operations here.

I haven’t really written much since the election. At first it was because I was, quite frankly, just too dispirited: the nasty shoulder injury I’d had back in the summer had made it difficult to type, and the forced discontinuation of my normal exercise routine had had a depressing influence on my state of mind in general. I had surgery for the shoulder in September, but the recovery was slow and painful, and the meds made it tiresome to concentrate. Meanwhile, it seemed that things were going to hell in the outside world in pretty much exactly the way I’d been most worried they might, and so my own specialty in these pages, which had been diagnosis and prediction, seemed suddenly rather beside the point.

By February or so I’d begun getting back to normal, physically and mentally, but then my wife and I decided it was time, after nearly 40 years of living in the same house, to put it up for sale. The process, which seemed at first to be going smoothly and simply, suddenly encountered some unexpected problems and setbacks (a story I might tell some other time), and we lost what had been the perfect buyers. Because we live in one of the bluest, Wokest neighborhoods in the nation, and given my own unfashionable opinions and the persecutorial tone of the times, I decided that it would be prudent, just for the time it might take to get the place sold, to keep a low online profile so as not to scare anyone off. (While it would be hard for me to imagine not buying a property I wanted merely because I might disagree with the owner’s thoughtful interpretation of history and current events, I realized that we are, at the moment, deeply in the grip of a mass religious hysteria, and that in such times anything is possible.) I figured the world could do without my depressing commentary for a little while — especially as the time for diagnosis is now mostly behind us, and things are, I think, going to roll forward from here with a heedless momentum of their own.

I look forward to beginning to write again this week. I’m afraid, though, that I’m a bit rusty. I’m afraid, also, that I am going to have to work hard not to sound rather badly blackpilled; the situation in the West has deteriorated very sharply in these last months.

I may also divert a little from what had become my primary focus over the last few years. These months of relative seclusion have been for me a bit of a study in getting older, in “keeping one’s head when all about you are losing theirs”, and a few other things that might be worth talking about.

Back soon.

Home Stretch

Still here. I’m anticipating, any day now, a long-awaited conclusion to a stressful process that has caused me, as a matter of prudence and caution, to keep a low online profile for the past several months. (I will explain later, but at this point I don’t want to jinx anything.)

Lord knows there’s plenty to comment on! – none of it good.

Nearly There

I’m getting ready to put things back to normal here, but I probably won’t be posting anything new just yet. Thank you all for your patience.

Service Notice

I’ve reopened the site for now, but may soon have to take it offline again for a bit. Sorry about the weird situation here.

Service Notice

We’re still on a break here. I do hope to be back in another weeks or two. Thanks as always for coming by – and do feel free to browse our archive, or try the “Random Post” link at top right.

Service Notice

I know it’s been awfully slow around here lately. It will likely be that way for another few weeks, I’m sorry to say, and I may even take the blog offline for a brief interval. (If that happens, feel free to write me and I’ll explain; my email is still the same old obvious one.)

I hope to be able to get things back to normal later in the spring.

Stick The Fork In

From last night’s Grammy Awards: here is the state of American “culture”.

A while ago I wrote that it is a sign of an ascending civilization that what is lower aspires to what is higher, while the reverse is true of a civilization in decline. In the golden age of Hollywood, eros was Fred Astaire dancing with Rita Hayworth, while authors, composers, and philosophers graced the covers of popular magazines. Our colleges and universities taught the great canon of Western literature and classical thought in order to cherish, preserve, and advance a magnificent cultural heritage thousands of years old.

And… here we are now. Draw your own conclusions.

H.R. 1319

Off to the White House it goes. It will be signed into law by Friday, if Mr. Biden can still lift a pen. (The full text of the thing is here, if you have a strong stomach, low blood pressure, and a month or two to read it.)

“When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.”

– B. Franklin

Time Out

“The worst pain a man can suffer: to have insight into much and power over nothing.”

– Herodotus

Airstrikes In Syria

36 days in. Here we go.

Michael Anton On Our Reichstag Fire And Its Aftermath

Here’s Michael Anton (with whom, in 2018, we had a brief exchange in the linked series of posts starting here), writing recently at Claremont Review of Books:

The vast majority of those who went to the Capitol did so without a plan, but they did have a goal: to be heard. Which was also the reason they voted for Donald Trump in the first place: they had not been heard in at least 30 years. But the actions of a few not only ensured that they would not be heard, but that instead they would get an earful of the same stuff most of them have been hearing their entire lives, only this time much louder: that everyone in the heartland, at least half the South, and anyone who voted for Trump is deplorable and irredeemable; that America itself is systemically racist; that most or all police are stormtroopers; that equal treatment under law is unjust; and that there are, fundamentally, two classes of people in the United States: the genetically deserving and the genetically guilty.

And now, in addition to all that, calls from the wise and good to investigate and “hold accountable” and cleanse from industry and employment people who did not storm the Capitol but who simply supported a politician and his agenda, as if this were somehow criminal. The Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson has proposed an effort to “deprogram” Trump voters. Prominent members of the Democratic Party such as former Labor Secretary Robert Reich have called for a “truth and reconciliation commission” like the kind that has followed the fall of shameful autocratic regimes. (And that, not coincidentally, uncovered little truth and produced even less reconciliation.) The Berggruen Institute’s Nils Gilman—a man who, perhaps not incidentally, recently called for my death—is having none of that. “These people need to be extirpated from politics,” he recently tweeted.

In Gilman and company’s eyes, Trump’s voters have no moral, political, or intellectual standing and no legitimate interests—only obligations arising from their inborn moral culpability. There is no reason at all to address their concerns or listen to them. Indeed, it’s dangerous even to let them speak lest they lead others into error. Worst of all is to allow them to organize around what they perceive as their interests, which inevitably leads them to express and perpetuate racism and other sins.

So that’s what Trump supporters hear; what do they see? Double standards and hypocrisy everywhere. Mike Flynn’s life ruined over a non-crime while the man who ruined it, James Comey, laughs about his handiwork on an Upper East Side stage. Four years of constant lies about Russian collusion and no reckoning, either for those who broke the law to get it going, or those who used their megaphone to keep it going. Changes to the voting system designed to help one party and marginalize theirs. A country flooded with immigration for more than half a century, padding the votes of the other party, driving down wages, and enriching oligarchs. A trade regime seemingly designed to ship their jobs overseas, close their factories, and empty out their towns. A media and intellectual class that no longer makes any pretense of fairness or objectivity but openly operates as the propaganda arm of the regime—to the extent it is not itself the regime. And now, an increasing tendency to demonize all dissent as terrorism and lock out of the political system—permanently—at least 47% of the population.

Read the whole thing here.

Meanwhile, the indefatigable JK has brought to our attention a podcast in which Andrew Sullivan “debates” Mr. Anton on Trumpism, the election, and the events of January 6th. (I dithered briefly about whether to use the scare-quotes around “debates”; you should listen to it here, and then tell me whether you think I was right to do so.)

Service Notice

Sorry to have gone all quiet here again. We are getting our house ready to sell, and having lived here since 1982, it’s a huge task. By the time we get to the end of each day — which is when I usually have some time to write — we’re whipped.

I’ll post up interesting links when I run across them, but I won’t be doing much more than that for a little while yet.

I will take a moment here to note that we’ve just landed the Perseverance rover on the surface of Mars, and it is happily transmitting data from its new home.

Rush Limbaugh Is Dead

How terribly sad this is. I really don’t know what to say… perhaps later. For now I’ll just quote Charles de Gaulle:

“The cemeteries are full of indispensable men.”

Another One Gone

I was deeply saddened to hear that the great jazz/Latin keyboardist and composer Chick Corea has died, at the age of 79. He was one of the towering musical artists of our time, and I’ve been a huge fan for more than fifty years (I first heard him play on Miles Davis’s groundbreaking album Bitches Brew, way back in 1970).

In the early Seventies Mr. Corea was bandleader of a variety of ensembles called Return to Forever, which had both acoustic and electric incarnations.

Here’s an early RTF classic, Spain:

And here’s the electric band, playing a lively number called Captain Señor Mouse:

Sadly, I never had a chance to work with Chick Corea in the studio. How I wish I had!

He will be sorely missed.

The Enemy Within

This post was just reprinted at American Greatness, so I’ve taken it down from here for a little while. Please read it over at their website.

Reminder

All healthy organisms, societies included, stabilize in a dynamic equilibrium by managing energy throughput (which of course means that they depend on increasing the entropy of the larger system that supports them).

“Rightism” acknowledges that there are natural principles that determine sustainable configurations and hierarchies, and incorporates that knowledge into societies as traditions.

This vast, incorporated knowledge is far greater than any individual can know or account for in detail. Much of what makes healthy systems stable is that they acknowledge, and adjust to, natural laws and relations.

“Leftism” imposes a far shallower understanding (and set of artificial goals) on this incomprehensibly complex reality, and usually starts by resenting hierarchies, distinctions, and differences.

Because it quickly drives the system away from natural optima it starts leaking heath, prosperity, happiness — which only makes it double down. (Example: our sudden political shift from “equality” to “equity”.) In this way it becomes parasitic on what the system it seeks to destroy has built up.

Once that’s all spent, it collapses.

The disconnection between natural order and intellectually, ideologically imposed “order” is like the difference between just letting your muscle-memory play a difficult piece of music and thinking about how your fingers are going to strike each note.

One produces listenable music, and the other doesn’t.

National Archive

A while back the New York Times mounted a direct assault on American patriotism called “The 1619 Project”, which sought to promote the idea that the founding of the American nation was nothing more than an act of organized evil, with its only basis and purpose the subjugation of other races by white, male, Europeans. Despite its blatantly hateful and corrosive intent, and its countless historical inaccuracies, the Project has been adopted by school-boards across the nation for the indoctrination of millions of our children.

To counter this vile attack on civic pride and national cohesion, President Trump assembled a panel of scholars and patriots to produce a response. The panel was called, understandably, “The 1776 Project”, and one of its primary aims was to explain in simple language the founding philosophy of the United States: a philosophy grounded in the idea that the essential purpose of American self-government is to secure a free people’s natural rights and liberties.

Joe Biden made the 1776 Project’s annihilation one of his top priorities upon seizing the Presidency, and extinguished it by executive order on his first day.

During its brief lifespan the now-defunct panel produced a single report, which has since been taken down from U.S. Government websites. I have, however, preserved a copy. Read it here.

Watershed

Here we are. It’s been a long twelve months: from sailing along at the beginning of 2020 with a booming economy and gathering momentum for a second Trump administration, and for holding terminal decline at bay for a precious few more years, to COVID, St. George Floyd, a long hot summer of government-sanctioned rioting for BLM and brutal lockdowns for the rest of us, capricious and unconstitutional changes to election law, media blackouts and Big Tech censorship of negative stories about the Bidens, deplatforming of the Right on social media, an election clearly tainted by the most audacious chicanery, characterization of any call to investigate said chicanery as supporting a white-supremacist coup, a synchronized move from calling Trump supporters “deplorables” and “racists” to characterizing them as actual terrorists, continuous gaslighting by all media, and finally, just today, the inauguration of a corrupt, senile groper almost certainly compromised by Communist China — someone whom scores of millions of patriotic Americans believe to have been illegitimately elected — as our forty-sixth President. Meanwhile the “Gigaphone” saturates all media, telling us that if we think anything’s wrong with any of this, we’re just troublemakers who ought to be — and soon will be — dealt with. Everything’s fine now, nothing to see here, and now we can all just relax and enjoy the Unity.

Until now, I have never been what is called an “accelerationist” — someone who wants bad times to get worse as quickly as possible, in order to provoke a necessary counter-reaction. Those people — I know lots of them — wanted Biden to win. I, on the other hand, worried that those who still loved the traditional American nation were as yet ill-prepared to resist in any coherent fashion the relentless, entropic pressure of our new secular religion, and so I hoped for another four years for Trump, to buy some much-needed time to prepare some sort of “ark” that might ride out the gathering storm.

Alas, it was not to be. We lost — not only the Presidency, but control of the Senate as well. And after what we saw in the election and its aftermath, about half the nation has also lost its faith in fair elections, and in the Supreme Court as any sort of backstop. (That same Court may also soon be deformed, by adding seats, into a mere rubber-stamp for further incursions upon what remains of the Constitution.)

I see two possible futures. (The one in which we all come together, reach across the aisle, realize that “what the heck, deep down we’re all still Americans“, and just hug it out is not a possible future.)

One is a gradual “frog-boiling”, in which the great ratcheting away of liberty and the traditional order that moved so far in 2020 continues indefinitely, while the former American nation, drowsy, atomized and supine, turns increasingly toward the great bosom of the State for all support and guidance — as urban dysfunction, declining public safety, disintegration of civil society and public trust, and venomous squabbling amongst a hodge-podge of mutually resentful identity groups for pieces of an ever-dwindling pie become more and more normal. Technological surveillance and a Chinese-style “social credit” system will keep troublemakers in their place, while the great yeastlike masses turn ever more inward, distracted and pacified by drugs, alcohol, pornography, and virtual entertainment. This is, I fear, all too likely, because it’s so easy: all it will take, to quote Burke, is “for good men to do nothing” — until it’s too late.

The other is some sort of genuine awakening. The frog must somehow realize, at last, what’s happening to it, and leap from the pot — which will only happen if those now in charge make the mistake of heating the water too quickly. And in the exultation of their victory, their humiliating defeat of Donald Trump, their sudden ascension to the zenith of political power, and their lust for vengeance upon the rabble that dared to usurp their throne for four years, those now in charge seem primed to do exactly that.

So yes: I’m an accelerationist now. There is no longer any reason not to be. Mr. Biden, Ms. Harris, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Pressley, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, and all the rest of you: bring on your Agenda!

Pack the Court. Fling open the borders. Add a few states. Savage our new-found energy-independence in the name of “saving the planet”. Jam your critical-race theory down our throats. Rezone our towns and villages. Tax and tax and tax us until we groan, so that we can entice the world to swamp our frontiers for “free” healthcare, education, and money. Raise the minimum wage — hell, why stop at a measly $15? Make it $50! — until millions more lose their jobs and have to go on the dole. Boot us off social media for our (formerly mainstream) opinions. Steal some more elections. Get cracking with that Green New Deal. Cozy back up to Iran. Make sure to remind us all the while that anybody who doesn’t like it (and all white people, just because) is a “hater” (or, now, a terrorist!) whose voice has no place in polite society. Make sure also, throughout, to have the media fawn over you just as much as they threw daggers at Donald Trump, and the American citizens who voted for him, for four long years. And come after our guns.

Let’s get on with it.

E Uno, Duo

For a couple of years now, radio host John Batchelor has had historian Michael Vlahos drop by on Friday evenings to discuss whether America is embroiled in a civil war. (Gee, what do you think, readers?)

The segments are short, and Professor Vlahos always has something interesting to say. This past Friday he used a metaphor that I haven’t heard elsewhere, and that I’m surprised I hadn’t thought of myself: mitosis.

In this ten-minute audio clip, Vlahos also talks about “vengeance cycles”, and the coming auto-da-fe. Worth your time.

Sounds About Right

From our e-pal Bill Keezer comes a handy checklist:

Nothing Is Real

The fog of war is abroad in the land, and in every direction sturdy, familiar realities dissolve into grotesque phantasms and chimeras. Trumpets and bullhorns blare in the smoke and chaos. The ground trembles and shifts under our feet.

One thing seems clear, I think: this Republic, as we have known it in our lifetimes and understood it to have existed for 243 years, is over. I hear the voices of stout “conservatives” talking about political strategy, and about how we will vote ourselves back into power — as if the nation we loved still lived, and was just going through a difficult spell. But the reality is a familiar one from science fiction: the friend or loved one we hope to nurse back to health is dead, gone, replaced by some ghastly alien who wears his body as a costume. I’m reminded of “Edgar” from Men In Black, whose hollowed-out corpse was put on by a roach-like monster who wore it around town even as it began to rot and stink.

 
We are going to have a lot of work to do, and we’d better start figuring out just what that means. But first I think we have to understand that, as hard as it is to accept, the USA of 2021 is no longer Edgar.

“Typical A.P. Work”

Here’s Michael Yon — who knows more about this sort of thing than anyone — about the role of Antifa in the Capitol riot.

Nothing To See Here

Curtis Yarvin, the former Moldbug, commented at once on yesterday’s big fizzle. In a post written late yesterday, he offered a quote from Twitter:

The Internet impresario Kantbot, who has become one of the most obnoxious literary talents since Marx or possibly Wyndham Lewis, still captured the day perfectly:

Imagine storming the Capital of the United States as the government of the country literally fucking flees and then just wandering around the building confused about why the level isn’t ending instead of declaring a new government and issuing warrants for congressmen’s arrest

Mr. Yarvin also quoted the German writer Ernst von Salomon, who said that “nothing is worse than the kind of German general who marches up to the Rubicon, then sits down to fish.”

The remarkable thing yesterday was that all those fed-up Americans actually had a chance to see, for a minute, how easy it all can be, if you have any idea what it is you actually want to do, and are determined and organized. (I mean, a hundred million people or more with the same general idea isn’t exactly nothing, unless they want to be.) In they went, like pushing on an open door, and — easy-peasy! — Congress ran for their lives. The bemused Visigoths, meanwhile, took some selfies and went home.

So there you have it, patriots. The “Biden” administration will be sworn in on January 20th. After that — well, the beatings will continue until morale improves.

Got a problem with that? I didn’t think so. You’ll be glad to hear, anyway, that we hope to allow limited indoor dining again by September or so; until then, please self-isolate and await further instructions.

Read Mr. Yarvin’s article here.

2021, Day Six

As I have been saying for a long time now:

“Gradually, then suddenly”.

Round Two

OK, so the polls are open in Georgia today. At stake in the two runoff elections is control of the United States Senate.

Is everyone feeling as optimistic as I am?

2021

Well, here we are. Happy New Year.

I thank all of you who’ve visited in recent weeks; there hasn’t been a whole lot to see here for some time now. My shoulder injury kept me off the keyboard for a while, but that’s not a problem any longer. Mainly it’s been that we have entered a new era of history here — and I’d already said most of what I had to say about the old era, and am still trying to understand what the new one will look like.

But here it is, New Year’s Day, and I can at least put down a few thoughts about what’s happened, and what I think might happen.

For starters, I’m still digesting the staggering audacity of the election heist. (If you really don’t think it was stolen, ask yourself: Can anyone seriously doubt that the other side would steal the election, if it thought it could do it and get away with it? And if the election actually had been stolen, how would would it look any different from what we’ve seen?)

The crime was done right before our eyes, as if daring us to do anything about it. A thing like that is much more than the thing itself: when power behaves this way it is, first and foremost, power’s way of chastening and humiliating you, of reminding you in the clearest possible terms that power can do what it wants. The right way to understand this rape of the recent election, then, is as the droit du seigneur, updated for our time.

The swaggering usurpation of our electoral wedding-night was followed by a suffocating blast from all media — what Curtis Yarvin, in this essay, refers to as the “Gigaphone”:

This active-denial system, the crowning achievement of 20th-century psychological warfare technology and the fundamental backbone of 21st-century democracy, is a kind of gigantic Paris-shelling railroad-gun bullhorn of pure proof by assertion.

At a certain caliber, assertion is no longer assertion. It is insistence. Increase the volume still further, and it becomes torture. The Gigaphone can indeed demonstrate the security of the election. Given arbitrary power—it can demonstrate anything.

The Gigaphone’s huge microwave dish hoses the unruly hobbit-mob with unendurable levels of red-hot contempt. With its throttle turned up to 11, the NYT’s headlines are ripped from the Rodong Sinmun, cat-lady middle-school teachers reading the New Yorker expect Waffen-SS paratroops to crash through their skylights, and the nation’s airports resound from lounge to lounge with the subtle sounds of TV Mille Collines. (All this is completely decentralized, of course. No one orders it—it just happens.)

The hobbit is simply embarrassed into compliance by his elven betters. The ideas he believes become a dangerous mental disease. This diagnosis is written into history. The sooner he gives up this nonsense, the better. To help convince him, we’ll make this idea quasi-illegal. The sooner he gives it up, the less his life will suffer. Eventually he can be fired for staying an idiot. Everyone will agree that he deserved it.

Some still hope that Trump will pull the rabbit out of the hat between now and Inauguration Day; that he will say the secret word and his armies of patriots will swing into action to secure the battle-theatre while an arcane Constitutional process plays out in Congress. I suppose that could happen, in some possible world, but I don’t think it will happen in this one. Sure, there will be rallies and demonstrations — a big one is planned for Wednesday in Washington — but I think it likely, I’m sad to say, that the legal efforts will fizzle, the Gigaphone will blare, and the moment will pass.

I do think the stolen election will create a deepening realization that things have changed; that the game as we have played it all our lives is over. Many will secede in their hearts, and will try to carry the American idea forward more locally — but it will be very difficult, will require a sustained effort and level of organization that we are now unaccustomed to, and many millions will just settle deeper into buglife.

As for COVID: I do not think that we will pull out of this pandemic. It’s too useful, and it has already conditioned us to live differently, and to choose safety and isolation over vigorous, authentic existence. All of our experiences are now curated, mediated, and delivered remotely. That’s a huge, sudden change that has enormous consequences, and opens many possibilities for those in power. While the vaccines may mitigate the problem, I expect that the effect will turn out not to be nearly as decisive as hoped: coverage will be gappy, new strains will appear, new flareups will happen whenever we loosen things up, and our year of training in self-isolation and timidity will tend to keep our new regime of restrictions on travel and assembly quite firmly in place. We’ll chafe a bit, but little by little we’re getting used to it all, and bit by bit we’ll forget what it was like to live and move more freely. (After all, what’s more important than staying safe?)

With the corruption of our institutions and descent into oligarchy now plainly in view, the cleverer and more resourceful among us will find ways to live well among the crumbling structures of the West. The rest will become, in their penurious isolation, increasingly dependent upon government largesse, like a great and docile mass of yeast: subsisting on Netflix, pornography, and soma. Rising all around them will be a sophisticated panopticon to monitor their homes and communications. (You getting all this, Alexa?)

There will almost certainly be some sort of “black swan” to dominate the news this year, but it is of course in the nature of black swans that you don’t know what they’ll be in advance, so I’ll say no more about that.

But — and this is important! — many of us will begin to think in new ways, because it will be completely obvious — we will know, at last, in our guts — that the old order of the Republic is dead. That means that there will be great opportunities for bold and daring people.

In short, then: “interesting times”. One has the sense that history is balanced on the edge of a knife. I’m reminded of Woody Allen’s words from long ago:

More than any time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction. Let us pray that we have the wisdom to choose correctly.

I won’t close with that, of course. While I admit this post has been a grim summary of what are, to be sure, somber times, there is never any reason to despair. (As chessplayers like to say, “nobody ever won a game by resigning”.) All of us who are lucky enough to be alive here and now have many, many blessings, and though of course there’s a struggle ahead, and much uncertainty, there’s no reason not to be thankful, determined, and even cheerful.

But if we are ever to find our way back to sunny uplands, we need to think hard, and frankly, about where we are, how on earth we got here, and where, exactly, we want to go. We need to understand what to hold on to — and why! — and what to let go. That’s what I hope to do here, with your help, going forward.

ABCDEFGHIJKMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Merry Christmas, everybody!

Sorry to have been so shtum lately; I seem to be in a kind of limbo, just busying myself with reading and musical work. I’m sure I’ll perk up soon.

Go Local

Writing at American Greatness, Christopher Roach argues that the Left, after patiently mounting a well-organized assault on all institutions, and after a century of expansion of the managerial state, now has power that is “largely immune from elections.” (After what we’ve just seen in 2020, can anyone doubt this?) He advises us that henceforward “Any purely political efforts should be local and issue-specific, rather than channeling our energies into a doomed bid for national power. ”

We can begin by severing the ties that lash us into the larger system and make us dependent on it. We can reduce our personal debt by frugality and change of habits, and try to find ways to live that give us more control and independence. And independence of thought plays a key role:

We live in an age of lies. Academic institutions are devoted less and less to inquiry and more and more to indoctrination. They also function to provide credentials for future leaders of the managerial system. The student loan program is a massive transfer payment system from the aspirational middle class to the wealthy.

There is little way for anyone of integrity to thrive in this system. Often, one must choose between success and one’s self-respect and honor. Consider the example of someone like General George Casey. After the Fort Hood massacre, he humiliated himself and said, “Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” This is not a legacy to be proud of.

It is not easy to unplug from the constant propaganda and groupthink. It is seductive and intertwined with moral judgments. But a real education is readily available to each of us: simply read old books.

The real history of our country, our civilization, our faith, and our people is there, along with much practical wisdom on every subject under the sun. It’s all more interesting and less corrosive than reality television, gaming, newspapers, or the rare gems found on the internet.

By fortifying one’s mind with the best of Western Civilization, one is immunized from the poorly reasoned, dishonest, and transparently self-serving narratives of the Left. None of this takes a degree or a student loan; it only takes a library card.

We should also focus more on local than national politics:

Trying to capture the upper echelons of the system won’t be permitted, as #TheResistance demonstrated in response to Donald Trump’s 2016 victory. We need to play a different game that leverages our strengths.

Local politics are probably a worthwhile locus of activity. With relatively less money and effort, one can achieve substantial influence, whether in primaries or otherwise. There’s a reason George Soros threw money into so many local prosecutors’ races.

Further, local governments have also shown themselves capable of surprising energy in enforcing (and resisting) the coronavirus mandates coming from the experts. One possible model of influence is New York’s Conservative Party, which will withhold its endorsement of the Republican candidate and, thereby, acts as a check on the more suicidal impulses of the Stupid Party.

Local politics also extends beyond elections. Spontaneous activism can be effective, like the well-armed homeowners who protected their neighborhood in Indiana from Black Lives Matter hooligans. Families and existing organizations have the capacity for mutual support and mutual defense. New organizations should emerge with these ends in mind, as well. They are going to be increasingly important in the face of a hostile government and an indifferent economic system.

Political activity goes beyond merely winning elections. Tens of thousands of Virginia gun owners peacefully marched in January. Even though pro-gun control Democrats won control of the state legislature and governorship, the proposed assault weapon ban was voted down in committee.

Above all, we should resist the atomizing of civil society — the severing of the horizontal ligatures that bind us together into a compact unity. Those who would dominate subjugate us know that as isolated individuals, we are most easily frightened and subdued. We must refocus our attention — away from placeless social media and the great, punishing energy-cone that Curtis Yarvin calls “The Gigaphone”, and toward our own communities — that is, toward those with whom we can actually build normal human relationships of trust and mutual assistance.

As with real insurgencies, the best tactics for the political insurgent are often the opposite of those appropriate for the regime. Thus, while monopolistic online “communities” are now highly regulated by woke weirdos, that’s not true of your backyard barbeque, your church, and your local gun club.

The source of strength for the dissident Right comes from those areas of life that exist outside of the economic-political-technocratic surveillance regime. The greatest potential exists among “in real life” friendships and family relationships. Your Twitter followers aren’t going to come to the rescue when Antifa is threatening your home or your business needs a loan. And it’s a lot harder for “cancel culture” to break the bonds of blood and shared experience.

The most workable model is less Ronald Reagan’s GOP and something more like Poland’s Solidarity movement in the 1980s. Even under Communism and the imposition of martial law, this grassroots trade union managed to resist the regime and convert the government’s suppression into a high cost in international censure. Some of Solidarity’s more important tactics included underground schools and workers’ strikes.

What if we went on strike?

It is difficult to adjust to the reality that ordinary politics essentially are over. The signs of a slow-motion breakdown of the old system first appeared only as fragments: Supreme Court cases on controversial social questions, sustained government growth under both Republican and Democratic administrations, intelligence agencies meddling in an election, and the full-bore resistance by the bureaucracy to the Trump Administration. The real “mask off” moment has been the suspect election of 2020.

We have to face reality and fight the good fight effectively on the terrain on which we now find ourselves. That means changing our lifestyles and efforts in ways that achieve maximum personal independence, mutual support, and tangible results.

In short, we must rebuild a civil society that has been torn apart by the combined economic and political pressures of the leftist managerial state.

Read the rest here.

It’s A Feature

From a just-released forensic report on the widely used Dominion voting system, as tested in Antrim County, Michigan (a red county where vote-tabulation errors were already known to have happened):

We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.

This was not a legitimate election, and there is a shocked and angry cohort of Americans, scores of millions strong, who will never accept the result. They will believe, instead, that the institutions that sustained this Republic for centuries have failed and abandoned them, that they are no longer governed by consent, and that they are now on their own — despised and rejected by the powerful factions who brought this about. I have no idea where this will lead, but the era of American history in which all of us grew up is over and done. A new epoch — far darker, and fraught with peril — begins.

Read the report here.

Accelerando

Aaaand… SCOTUS strikes again, refusing to take the Constitutional election-irregularity case brought by Texas and joined by many other states. Newcomers Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett all teamed up with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Roberts to stonewall the complaint. As Thomas and Alito pointed out in their dissent, this was an abrogation of their responsibility as original jurisdiction for disputes between the states: there is no other place to resolve such things, save for what John Locke called an “appeal to Heaven”.

The Court took a risk with this decision. By going squishy on election enforcement, they may have hoped to avoid putting themselves in the middle of the great conflict of our era. But Donald Trump may turn out to have been all that stood between those nine Justices and the court-packing scheme of the Democrats — especially if the decision emboldens party operatives in Georgia to fiddle with the upcoming Senate runoffs in that state.

After all, why would anyone worry, at this point, about not getting away with election-rigging?

Things are heating up briskly now in America. Both sides seem to have come comfortably to terms with the idea that there will be no reconciliation with the Other, and are speaking quite openly about extinction, subjugation, etc. I’ve written before about how civil war is like a black hole, in that you don’t know, when falling into one, just when you’ve crossed the event horizon. At some point, though, it becomes obvious. (As, I think, it now has here.)

It Was 40 Years Ago Today

… Mark Chapman took the band away.

R.I.P. John Lennon, who transformed the world of music, and so the world.